Summary

The surface radars market is projected to reach USD 22.49 billion by 2029, from USD 17.26 billion in 2024, at a CAGR of 5.4%. The volume of surface radars is projected to grow from 4690 (in Units) in 2024 to 6113 (in Units) by 2029. The market is driven by key factors, including US defense programs to counter threats, a surge in demand due to ongoing conflicts, and global defense expenditure. The development of missile defense systems and the nature of warfare further fuel market growth. However, the market faces challenges from regulations on arms transfers, operational complexities requiring maintenance, and the development costs of missile systems, which can hinder expansion.
“Based on frequency band, X-Band segment is estimated to capture the largest share in the market during the forecast period”
The X-Band frequency segment is likely to capture the largest share in the surface radar market within the forecast period with higher application in both military and commercial domains. X-Band radars are highly accurate and are more sensitive, hence used for missile defense systems, airborne surveillance, and naval radar systems. These are highly used for low-observable objects such as drones, aircraft, and missiles especially in areas with high clutter conditions like urban or coastal regions. The growing geopolitical tensions and the increase in interests in border security also contribute to high demand for X-Band radars in military applications. However, it is pushed further by the latest radar technologies in the offering, such as Active Electronically Scanned Array that, in turn provides greater power of detection along with tracking capabilities of X-Band radars. Civil application is on the rise in weather monitoring and air traffic control, pushing the market share even higher than the present rate.
“Based on waveform, the Frequency Modulated Continous Wave (FMCW) segment forecasted to grow at highest CAGR during forecast period ”
The FMCW radar segment is likely to achieve the highest CAGR in the forecast period. Advances made in FMCW radars support real-time target identification with high-resolution imaging, hence igniting their adoption. Consequently, such a type of radar technology is critical for applications where continuous detection and ranging without any interruptions is sought after, including surveillance systems, autonomous vehicles, and air traffic control. FMCW radars are also increasingly used in unmanned systems and anti-drone technology, and for this reason, the role they play is key to modern warfare and counter-terrorist operations. Current interest in more precise tracking and target identification in defense applications gives the demand for FMCW radars a strong boost due to its accuracy advantage and longer range than traditional pulsed radars. Other reasons for this growth relate to the greater incorporation of these products into industrial applications, such as commercial automation and monitoring of safety conditions.
“ The Europe region is estimated to be the largest market during the forecast period”
The Europe region is likely to dominate the surface radar market for the forecast period, driven by several key factors. There are several leading defense contractors such as Thales, BAE Systems, and Leonardo S.p.A located in Europe, which has been investing heavily in the development of the radar system for military and civil applications. This is now compelling European countries to improve their air and missile defense systems as rising geopolitical tensions in the region, including border security concerns, get on their nerves due to NATO-Russia relations. France, Germany, and the UK are among the countries increasing defense spending, and demand for such advanced radar technologies that can offer early warning and real-time surveillance will now be seen increasing. Furthermore, increased concern for the development of smart cities and civil infrastructure in Europe is driving the adoption of radar systems in smart city infrastructure, including applications in road traffic management and weather forecasting, for the protection of critical infrastructure. The collaborative defense programs that are ongoing, such as NATO defense initiatives, also promote market growth by expanding the deployment of radar systems across various NATO member countries.
In-depth interviews have been conducted with chief executive officers (CEOs), Directors, and other executives from various key organizations operating in the surface radars marketplace.


• By Company Type: Tier 1 – 35%, Tier 2 – 45%, and Tier 3 – 20%
• By Designation: C-level – 35%, Director Level – 25%, and Others – 40%
• By Region: North America– 35%, Europe – 20%, Asia Pacific– 30%, Middle East – 10% and Rest of the World - 5%

include Lockheed Martin Corporation (US), RTX (US), BAE Systems (UK), Northrop Grumman (US), L3Harris Corporation (US), Leonardo S.p.A (Italy), Israel Aerospace Industries (Israel), Thales (France), Saab AB (Sweden), Elbit Systems Ltd. (Israel), and are some of the leading players operating in the surface radars market.
Research Coverage
This research report categorizes the surface radars market by platform, application, range, frequency, dimension, component, waveform, and by Region. The scope of the report covers detailed information regarding the major factors, such as drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities, influencing the growth of the surface radars market. A detailed analysis of the key industry players has been done to provide insights into their business overview, products, and services; key strategies; Contracts, partnerships, agreements, new product launches, and recent developments associated with the surface radars market. Competitive analysis of upcoming startups in surface radars market ecosystem is covered in this report.
Key benefits of buying this report: This report will help the market leaders/new entrants in this market with information on the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall surface radars market and its subsegments. The report covers the entire ecosystem of the surface radars market. It will help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to position their businesses better and plan suitable go-to-market strategies. The report will also help stakeholders understand the pulse of the market and provide them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:
• Analysis of key Drivers (Focus on enhancing homeland security and border surveillance capabilities, advancements in radar technologies, emergence of modern warfare , requirement for drone detection systems at airports), restrains (Need for substantial R&D funding), opportunities (Increased advancements in Hardware & Software Integration in Radar Technology, increased Compact Radars for Anti-drones application , increasing preference for phased array solid-state radars, development of low-cost and miniaturized radars) and challenges (Extreme weather conditions, Vulnerability of radars to new jamming techniques) influencing the growth of the market.
• Product Development/Innovation: Detailed Insights on upcoming technologies, R&D activities, and new products/solutions launched in the market.
• Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets – the report analyses the surface radars market across varied regions
• Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new solutions, recent developments, and investments in the surface radars market
• Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and service offerings of leading players including Lockheed Martin Corporation (US), RTX (US), BAE Systems (UK), Northrop Grumman (US), L3Harris Corporation (US), Leonardo S.p.A (Italy) and among others in the surface radars market.

ページTOPに戻る

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION 29
1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES 29
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION 29
1.3 STUDY SCOPE 30
1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION 30
1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS 31
1.4 YEARS CONSIDERED 31
1.5 CURRENCY CONSIDERED 32
1.6 STAKEHOLDERS 32
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 33
2.1 RESEARCH DATA 33
2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA 34
2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources 35
2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA 35
2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources 36
2.1.2.2 Insights from industry experts 36
2.1.2.3 Breakdown of primary interviews 37
2.2 FACTOR ANALYSIS 37
2.2.1 INTRODUCTION 37
2.2.2 DEMAND-SIDE ANALYSIS 37
2.2.3 SUPPLY-SIDE ANALYSIS 38
2.3 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION 38
2.3.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH 38
2.3.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH 39
2.4 DATA TRIANGULATION 40
2.5 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS 40
2.6 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS 41
2.7 RISK ASSESSMENT 41
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 42
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS 45
4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN SURFACE RADARS MARKET 45
4.2 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY APPLICATION 45
4.3 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY COMPONENT 46
4.4 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY WAVEFORM 46
4.5 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 47
4.6 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY REGION 47
5 MARKET OVERVIEW 48
5.1 INTRODUCTION 48
5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS 48
5.2.1 DRIVERS 49
5.2.1.1 Focus on enhancing homeland security and border surveillance capabilities 49
5.2.1.2 Advancements in radar technologies 49
5.2.1.3 Emergence of modern warfare 49
5.2.1.4 Requirements for drone detection systems at airports 50
5.2.1.5 Enhanced maritime safety and operational efficiency 50
5.2.2 RESTRAINTS 51
5.2.2.1 Insufficient R&D funding 51
5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES 51
5.2.3.1 Increased advancements in hardware and software integration in radar technology 51
5.2.3.2 Increased use of compact radars for anti-drone applications 51
5.2.3.3 Preference for phased array solid-state radars 52
5.2.3.4 Development of low-cost, miniaturized radars 52
5.2.4 CHALLENGES 52
5.2.4.1 Extreme weather conditions 52
5.2.4.2 Vulnerability of radars to new jamming techniques 53
5.3 TRENDS AND DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS 53
5.4 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS 53
5.4.1 PROMINENT COMPANIES 53
5.4.2 PRIVATE AND SMALL ENTERPRISES 54
5.4.3 END USERS 54
5.5 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS 55
5.6 PRICING ANALYSIS 56
5.6.1 INDICATIVE PRICING ANALYSIS, BY PLATFORM 56
5.7 OPERATIONAL DATA 58
5.8 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 59
5.8.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES 59
5.8.1.1 Gallium nitride semiconductor 59
5.8.1.2 Active electronically scanned array 59
5.8.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES 59
5.8.2.1 Quantum computing 59
5.8.3 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES 60
5.8.3.1 Sensor fusion 60
5.8.3.2 Photonics and optical technologies 60
5.8.3.3 Other technologies 60
 
5.9 TRADE ANALYSIS 61
5.9.1 IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 8526) 61
5.9.2 EXPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 8526) 62
5.10 USE CASE ANALYSIS 63
5.10.1 INTEGRATION OF ADVANCED RADAR SYSTEMS IN INS VIKRANT TO ENHANCE NAVAL DEFENSE AND SURVEILLANCE 63
5.10.2 DEPLOYMENT OF LEONARDO’S TMMR TO MEET DEMAND FOR MOBILE RADARS WITH WORLD-CLASS PERFORMANCE 63
5.10.3 NAVTECH’S RADAR TECHNOLOGY MAINTAINS SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY IN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX AND AUTONOMOUS MARINE ENVIRONMENT 63
5.10.4 US MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY AND RAYTHEON MISSILES & DEFENSE COLLABORATED TO REPLACE COOLING SYSTEM OF SEA-BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) WITH NEW, ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY COMPONENTS 64
5.11 KEY CONFERENCES & EVENTS, 2024–2025 64
5.12 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE 65
5.13 KEY STAKEHOLDERS & BUYING CRITERIA 67
5.13.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS 67
5.13.2 BUYING CRITERIA 68
5.14 TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP 69
5.15 TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP 70
5.16 BILL OF MATERIALS 71
5.17 SURFACE RADARS MARKET: BUSINESS MODELS 73
5.18 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO 75
5.19 MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK 76
5.19.1 INTRODUCTION 76
5.19.2 NORTH AMERICA 76
5.19.3 EUROPE 77
5.19.4 ASIA PACIFIC 77
5.19.5 MIDDLE EAST 78
5.19.6 ROW 78
6 INDUSTRY TRENDS 79
6.1 INTRODUCTION 79
6.2 TECHNOLOGY TRENDS 79
6.2.1 SOFTWARE-DEFINED RADARS 79
6.2.2 MULTIPLE-INPUT AND MULTIPLE-OUTPUT (MIMO) 80
6.2.3 INVERSE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADARS 80
6.2.4 QUANTUM RADARS 80
6.3 IMPACT OF MEGATRENDS 81
6.3.1 ADVENT OF INTERNET OF THINGS 81
6.3.2 SHIFT IN GLOBAL ECONOMIC POWER 81
6.3.3 DEVELOPMENT OF ANTENNAS IN RADAR SYSTEMS 81
6.4 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS 82
6.5 IMPACT OF AI ON SURFACE RADARS MARKET 83
6.5.1 INTRODUCTION 83
6.5.2 ADOPTION OF AI IN MILITARY BY TOP COUNTRIES 83
6.5.3 IMPACT OF AI ON DEFENSE: USE CASES 85
6.5.4 IMPACT OF AI ON SURFACE RADARS MARKET 86
6.6 PATENT ANALYSIS 88
7 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY PLATFORM 92
7.1 INTRODUCTION 93
7.2 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 94
7.2.1 MODERNIZATION OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE TO LEAD TO INCREASED DEMAND FOR RADAR SYSTEMS 94
7.2.2 AIRPORTS 94
7.2.3 SEAPORTS 95
7.2.4 POWER PLANTS 95
7.2.5 MILITARY BASES & COMMAND CENTRES 95
7.2.6 OIL & GAS PRODUCTION SITES 95
7.3 VEHICLE-MOUNTED 96
7.3.1 NEED FOR WIDE SURVEILLANCE COVERAGE TO DRIVE DEMAND 96
7.3.2 MILITARY 96
7.3.3 COMMERCIAL 96
7.4 SHIPBORNE 96
7.4.1 INCREASE IN ILLEGAL MARITIME ACTIVITIES TO DRIVE DEMAND FOR SHIPBORNE RADAR SYSTEMS 96
7.4.2 MILITARY 97
7.4.3 COMMERCIAL 97
7.5 UNMANNED SURFACE VEHICLES 97
7.5.1 NEED FOR ADVANCED SOLUTIONS TO TRACK SECURITY THREATS TO SPUR GROWTH 97
7.5.2 MILITARY 98
7.5.3 COMMERCIAL 98
7.6 OTHER PLATFORMS 98
8 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY COMPONENT 99
8.1 INTRODUCTION 100
8.2 ANTENNAS 101
8.2.1 ADVANCED COMMUNICATION NEEDS AND MODERN WARFARE REQUIREMENTS TO DRIVE DEMAND FOR ANTENNAS 101
8.2.2 PARABOLIC REFLECTOR ANTENNAS 101
8.2.3 SLOTTED WAVEGUIDE ANTENNAS 102
8.2.4 PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS 102
8.2.5 MULTIPLE-INPUT AND MULTIPLE-OUTPUT (MIMO) 102
8.2.6 ACTIVE SCANNED ARRAY ANTENNAS 102
8.2.7 PASSIVE SCANNED ARRAY ANTENNAS 102
8.3 TRANSMITTERS 103
8.3.1 INCREASED DEMAND FOR COMPLEX MILITARY COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE TO DRIVE GROWTH 103
8.3.2 MICROWAVE TUBE-BASED TRANSMITTERS 103
8.3.3 SOLID-STATE ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTERS 103
8.4 RECEIVERS 103
8.4.1 RADAR RECEIVERS USE POWER AMPLIFIERS FOR SIGNAL AMPLIFICATION 103
8.4.2 ANALOG 103
8.4.3 DIGITAL 104
8.5 POWER AMPLIFIERS 104
8.5.1 POWER AMPLIFIERS EMPLOY ELECTRONIC SYSTEM DESIGN TO FOCUS ON EFFICIENCY AND LINEARITY 104
8.5.2 TRAVELING WAVE TUBE AMPLIFIERS 104
8.5.3 SOLID-STATE POWER AMPLIFIERS 104
8.5.3.1 Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) 104
8.5.3.2 Gallium Nitride (GaN) 104
8.5.3.3 Silicon carbide 105
8.5.4 GALLIUM NITRIDE POWER AMPLIFIERS 105
8.6 DUPLEXERS 105
8.6.1 DUPLEXERS ARE REQUIRED WHEN SINGLE ANTENNA IS USED TO TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE SIGNALS 105
8.6.2 BRANCH-TYPE DUPLEXERS 105
8.6.3 BALANCED-TYPE DUPLEXERS 105
8.6.4 CIRCULATOR DUPLEXERS 105
8.7 DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS 106
8.7.1 NEED FOR ADVANCED, HIGH-END PROCESSORS TO DRIVE DEMAND FOR DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS 106
8.8 GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES 106
8.8.1 GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES ALLOW USERS TO COMMUNICATE USING GRAPHICAL ICONS AND TEXT-BASED INTERFACES WITH ELECTRONIC DEVICES 106
8.8.2 CONTROL PANELS 106
8.8.3 GRAPHIC PANELS 106
8.8.4 DISPLAYS 107
8.9 STABILIZATION SYSTEMS 107
8.9.1 STABILIZATION SYSTEMS ENHANCE MILITARY MOBILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF COMBATS 107
8.10 OTHER COMPONENTS 107
 
9 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY WAVEFORM 108
9.1 INTRODUCTION 109
9.2 FREQUENCY-MODULATED CONTINUOUS WAVE (FMCW) 110
9.2.1 NEED FOR VERSATILITY AND ACCURACY IN COVERT OPERATIONS TO DRIVE DEMAND 110
9.3 DOPPLER 110
9.3.1 DEMAND FOR ADVANCED WEATHER PREDICTION TECHNOLOGIES TO BOOST DEMAND FOR DOPPLER RADARS 110
9.3.2 CONVENTIONAL DOPPLER RADARS 110
9.3.3 PULSE DOPPLER RADARS 111
10 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY FREQUENCY BAND 112
10.1 INTRODUCTION 113
10.2 HF/UHF/VHF-BAND 114
10.2.1 HF/UHF/VHF-BAND RADARS FACILITATE LONG-RANGE SURVEILLANCE AND TRACKING 114
10.3 L-BAND 115
10.3.1 L-BAND RADARS ARE WIDELY USED IN SPACE-BASED PLATFORMS 115
10.4 S-BAND 115
10.4.1 S-BAND RADARS ARE USED FOR MODERATE-RANGE SURVEILLANCE 115
10.5 C-BAND 116
10.5.1 S-BAND RADARS PROVIDE ROBUST SURVEILLANCE AND PRECISE TARGET-TRACKING CAPABILITIES 116
10.6 X-BAND 116
10.6.1 X-BAND RADARS CAN DETECT HIDDEN WEAPONS AND EXPLORE SPACE ENVIRONMENT DURING MAPPING 116
10.7 KU-BAND 117
10.7.1 KU-BAND RADARS PROVIDE HIGH-RESOLUTION IMAGING WITH ROBUST SIGNAL 117
10.8 KA-BAND 117
10.8.1 KA-BAND RADARS DELIVER HIGH THROUGHPUT BEAMS AND HIGH BANDWIDTH COMMUNICATION 117
10.9 MULTI-BAND 117
10.9.1 GROWING DEMAND FOR BETTER RADAR SIGNALS TO BOOST ADOPTION OF MULTI-BAND RADARS 117
11 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY RANGE 118
11.1 INTRODUCTION 119
11.2 LONG RANGE 120
11.2.1 NEED FOR LONG-DISTANCE TRACKING AND ACCURATE LOCATION TO DRIVE MARKET 120
11.3 MEDIUM RANGE 120
11.3.1 MEDIUM-RANGE RADARS ENHANCE BORDER SECURITY AND WEAPON GUIDANCE 120
 
11.4 SHORT RANGE 120
11.4.1 SHORT-RANGE RADARS ARE USED IN COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OR MAN-PORTABLE RECONNAISSANCE MISSIONS 120
11.5 VERY SHORT RANGE 121
11.5.1 VERY SHORT-RANGE RADARS ARE EFFECTIVE IN TRACKING FLYING THREATS 121
12 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY APPLICATION 122
12.1 INTRODUCTION 123
12.2 SURVEILLANCE 124
12.2.1 SURVEILLANCE RADARS CAN TRACK AND IDENTIFY AIRCRAFT FLYING LOW AND AT GREAT DISTANCE 124
12.3 AIR DEFENSE 124
12.3.1 GROWING NUMBER AND SOPHISTICATION OF THREATS TO BOOST GROWTH 124
12.4 PERIMETER SECURITY 125
12.4.1 INCREASED INVESTMENTS IN BORDER SECURITY OPERATIONS TO ENCOURAGE MARKET EXPANSION 125
12.5 BATTLEFIELD ISR 125
12.5.1 RADAR SYSTEMS PROVIDE REAL-TIME DATA ON ENEMY MOVEMENTS, ALLOWING MILITARY FORCES TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS 125
12.6 OTHER APPLICATIONS 126
13 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY DIMENSION 127
13.1 INTRODUCTION 128
13.2 2D 129
13.2.1 2D RADARS ARE WIDELY ACCEPTED FOR TERRESTRIAL, NAVAL, AND AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE 129
13.3 3D 129
13.3.1 ENHANCED CAPABILITIES OF 3D RADARS TO DRIVE THEIR DEMAND AND ADOPTION 129
13.4 4D 130
13.4.1 4D RADARS ARE USED FOR AUTONOMOUS TACTICAL SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS TO GENERATE HIGH-RESOLUTION TARGET SIGNALS 130
14 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY 131
14.1 SOFTWARE-DEFINED RADARS 131
14.1.1 SOFTWARE-DEFINED RADARS OFFER ENHANCED DEFENSE AGAINST LIMITED, LOW-ALTITUDE AIR THREATS 131
14.1.2 MULTIPLE-INPUT AND MULTIPLE-OUTPUT 131
14.1.3 PHASED ARRAY RADARS 131
14.1.3.1 Active electronically scanned arrays 131
14.1.3.2 Passive electronically scanned arrays 132
14.2 CONVENTIONAL RADARS 132
14.2.1 CONVENTIONAL RADARS ARE IMMUNE TO JAMMING, DETECTION, AND EXTERNAL INTERFERENCE 132
 
14.3 QUANTUM RADARS 132
14.3.1 QUANTUM RADARS PERFORM ACCURATE RADAR DETECTION AND STRENGTHEN DEFENSE 132
15 SURFACE RADARS MARKET, BY REGION 133
15.1 INTRODUCTION 134
15.2 NORTH AMERICA 135
15.2.1 PESTLE ANALYSIS 135
15.2.2 US 142
15.2.2.1 Need for strategic advancements in defense technologies to drive market 142
15.2.3 CANADA 143
15.2.3.1 Focus on improving surveillance radar technology to drive market 143
15.3 EUROPE 145
15.3.1 PESTLE ANALYSIS 145
15.3.2 UK 152
15.3.2.1 Rapid growth in military expenditure and increase in special surveillance and missile defense programs to drive market 152
15.3.3 GERMANY 153
15.3.3.1 Advanced technological capabilities and robust defense industry to drive market 153
15.3.4 FRANCE 155
15.3.4.1 Rising demand for surveillance systems to fuel market growth 155
15.3.5 ITALY 156
15.3.5.1 Focus on defense modernization and technological advancements 156
15.3.6 REST OF EUROPE 158
15.4 ASIA PACIFIC 159
15.4.1 PESTLE ANALYSIS 160
15.4.2 INDIA 166
15.4.2.1 Increased procurement of defense systems to drive market 166
15.4.3 JAPAN 167
15.4.3.1 Heightened security concerns to drive popularity of surface radars 167
15.4.4 SOUTH KOREA 169
15.4.4.1 Strategic investments and advancements in radar technology to fuel growth 169
15.4.5 AUSTRALIA 170
15.4.5.1 Emphasis on upgrading 737-based E-7 radar jets to indicate advancements in surface radars market 170
15.4.6 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC 172
 
15.5 MIDDLE EAST 173
15.5.1 PESTLE ANALYSIS 173
15.5.2 GCC COUNTRIES 180
15.5.2.1 Saudi Arabia 180
15.5.2.1.1 Government initiatives such as ‘Vision 2030’ to drive market 180
15.5.2.2 UAE 182
15.5.2.2.1 Increasing ballistic missile attacks from neighboring countries to drive market 182
15.5.3 TURKEY 183
15.5.3.1 Increasing focus on modernizing defense capabilities to drive market 183
15.5.4 ISRAEL 185
15.5.4.1 Increasing domestic production capabilities and rise in government investments in defense sector to drive market 185
15.6 REST OF THE WORLD 186
15.6.1 PESTLE ANALYSIS 187
15.6.2 LATIN AMERICA 192
15.6.2.1 Rigorous efforts to strengthen defense forces to drive market 192
15.6.3 AFRICA 194
15.6.3.1 Focus on small CubeSats for space-based surveillance to drive market 194
16 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE 196
16.1 INTRODUCTION 196
16.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN 196
16.3 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 198
16.4 REVENUE ANALYSIS 200
16.5 BRAND COMPARISON 201
16.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2023 201
16.6.1 STARS 201
16.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS 202
16.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS 202
16.6.4 PARTICIPANTS 202
16.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS 203
16.7 COMPANY VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS 207
16.8 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2023 207
16.8.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES 207
16.8.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES 208
16.8.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES 208
16.8.4 STARTING BLOCKS 208
16.8.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES, 2023 209
 
16.9 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO 210
16.9.1 MARKET EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 210
16.9.2 PRODUCT LAUNCHES/DEVELOPMENTS 210
16.9.3 DEALS 212
16.9.4 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 214
17 COMPANY PROFILES 221
17.1 KEY PLAYERS 221
17.1.1 RTX 221
17.1.1.1 Business overview 221
17.1.1.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 222
17.1.1.3 Recent developments 223
17.1.1.3.1 Other developments 223
17.1.1.4 MnM view 225
17.1.1.4.1 Right to win 225
17.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices 225
17.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats 225
17.1.2 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 226
17.1.2.1 Business overview 226
17.1.2.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 227
17.1.2.3 Recent developments 228
17.1.2.3.1 Product launches 228
17.1.2.3.2 Deals 229
17.1.2.3.3 Other developments 229
17.1.2.4 MnM view 230
17.1.2.4.1 Right to win 230
17.1.2.4.2 Strategic choices 230
17.1.2.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats 230
17.1.3 L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 231
17.1.3.1 Business overview 231
17.1.3.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 232
17.1.3.3 Recent developments 233
17.1.3.3.1 Deals 233
17.1.3.3.2 Other developments 234
17.1.3.4 MnM view 234
17.1.3.4.1 Right to win 234
17.1.3.4.2 Strategic choices 234
17.1.3.4.3 Weaknesses & competitive threats 234
 
17.1.4 THALES 235
17.1.4.1 Business overview 235
17.1.4.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 236
17.1.4.3 Recent developments 237
17.1.4.3.1 Product launches 237
17.1.4.3.2 Other developments 238
17.1.4.4 MnM view 239
17.1.4.4.1 Right to win 239
17.1.4.4.2 Strategic choices 239
17.1.4.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats 239
17.1.5 ISRAEL AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES 240
17.1.5.1 Business overview 240
17.1.5.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 241
17.1.5.3 Recent developments 242
17.1.5.3.1 Product launches 242
17.1.5.3.2 Deals 242
17.1.5.3.3 Other developments 243
17.1.5.4 MnM view 243
17.1.5.4.1 Right to win 243
17.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices 243
17.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats 243
17.1.6 LEONARDO S.P.A. 244
17.1.6.1 Business overview 244
17.1.6.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 245
17.1.6.3 Recent developments 247
17.1.6.3.1 Deals 247
17.1.6.3.2 Other developments 247
17.1.7 BAE SYSTEMS 249
17.1.7.1 Business overview 249
17.1.7.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 250
17.1.7.3 Recent developments 251
17.1.7.3.1 Product launches 251
17.1.7.3.2 Deals 252
17.1.7.3.3 Other developments 252
17.1.8 NORTHROP GRUMMAN 253
17.1.8.1 Business overview 253
17.1.8.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 254
17.1.8.3 Recent developments 255
17.1.8.3.1 Product launches 255
17.1.8.3.2 Other developments 255
 
17.1.9 ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD. 256
17.1.9.1 Business overview 256
17.1.9.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 257
17.1.9.3 Recent developments 258
17.1.9.3.1 Product launches 258
17.1.9.3.2 Deals 259
17.1.9.3.3 Other developments 259
17.1.10 BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED 260
17.1.10.1 Business overview 260
17.1.10.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 261
17.1.10.3 Recent developments 263
17.1.10.3.1 Product launches 263
17.1.10.3.2 Other developments 263
17.1.11 INDRA 264
17.1.11.1 Business overview 264
17.1.11.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 265
17.1.11.3 Recent developments 265
17.1.11.3.1 Product launches 265
17.1.11.3.2 Deals 266
17.1.11.3.3 Other developments 266
17.1.12 ASELSAN A.Ş. 267
17.1.12.1 Business overview 267
17.1.12.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 268
17.1.12.3 Recent developments 270
17.1.12.3.1 Product launches 270
17.1.12.3.2 Deals 270
17.1.12.3.3 Other developments 270
17.1.13 SAAB 271
17.1.13.1 Business overview 271
17.1.13.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 272
17.1.13.3 Recent developments 273
17.1.13.3.1 Other developments 273
17.1.14 TELEDYNE FLIR LLC 274
17.1.14.1 Business overview 274
17.1.14.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 274
17.1.14.3 Recent developments 276
17.1.14.3.1 Product launches 276
17.1.14.3.2 Deals 276
 
17.1.15 HENSOLDT 277
17.1.15.1 Business overview 277
17.1.15.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered 277
17.1.15.3 Recent developments 278
17.1.15.3.1 Product launches 278
17.1.15.3.2 Other developments 279
17.2 OTHER PLAYERS 280
17.2.1 BLIGHTER SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS LIMITED 280
17.2.2 DETECT, INC. 281
17.2.3 TERMA 282
17.2.4 ACCIPITER RADAR 283
17.2.5 PIERSIGHT 283
17.2.6 REUTECH RADAR SYSTEMS 284
17.2.7 SRC INC. 284
17.2.8 EASAT RADAR SYSTEMS LIMITED 285
17.2.9 ECHODYNE CORP. 286
17.2.10 MAGOS SYSTEMS 287
18 APPENDIX 288
18.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE 288
18.2 ANNEXURE A: DEFENSE PROGRAM MAPPING 291
18.3 ANNEXURE B: OTHER MAPPED COMPANIES 294
18.4 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL 296
18.5 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS 298
18.6 RELATED REPORTS 298
18.7 AUTHOR DETAILS 299