世界各国のリアルタイムなデータ・インテリジェンスで皆様をお手伝い

ロボット手術の革新 2020-2030年:技術、企業&市場:ロボット手術全般、カテーテルと内視鏡のロボティックナビゲーション、手術ツールのロボットによる位置取り、手術中のカメラ操作用ロボットシステム、ロボット手術におけるAI、ロボット手術における光学フィードバックメカニズム


Innovations in Robotic Surgery 2020-2030: Technologies, Players & Markets

このレポートはロボット手術市場の新興技術について言及し、主要企業のハイライトや部門ごとの市場分析を行っています。部門や企業の収益データについても掲載しています。   Report D... もっと見る

 

 

出版社 出版年月 価格 ページ数 言語
IDTechEx
アイディーテックエックス
2020年3月19日 お問い合わせください
ライセンス・価格情報
注文方法はこちら
216 英語

※価格はデータリソースまでお問い合わせください。


 

サマリー

このレポートはロボット手術市場の新興技術について言及し、主要企業のハイライトや部門ごとの市場分析を行っています。部門や企業の収益データについても掲載しています。
 
Report Details
For centuries, large incisions were the only way to provide surgeons with a full view of the organ they needed to treat. Recovery time for such a taxing procedure is extensive and post-operative complications are a common occurrence. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in operating theatres has drastically improved patient outcomes. Smaller incisions reduce the risk of infection and accelerate recovery. Many studies have shown that MIS procedures result in decreased post-operative hospital stays, a quicker return to the workforce, decreased pain and better immune function.
 
As attractive as MIS is, there are several drawbacks due to the technical and mechanical nature of the equipment. These limitations make minimally invasive procedures more challenging, reduce their efficiency and increase operating time.
 
Robotic surgery was developed to overcome the limitations of MIS and to expand its benefits. It is classified as a type of MIS and involves the use of robotic systems to execute surgical procedures. Although it has been around for over thirty years, robotic surgery is still in its infancy. The market is currently in a rapid state of expansion, however, as it has welcomed dozens of new companies in the last decade. The range of technologies, uses and applications of robotic surgery widens with each new entrant. This field is evolving at a considerable pace and is showing no signs of slowing down. Within the last five years, interest in robotic surgery has soared. Investments in companies operating in this space have skyrocketed since 2016, recording an increase of over 300% in three years, and total investment to date has reached $1.36 billion.
 
History of robotic surgery: an overview
Source: IDTechEx Report "Innovations in Robotic Surgery 2020-2030"
 
This report breaks down the robotic surgery market into four main sectors:
• Robotic general surgery
• Robotic catheter and endoscope navigation
• Robotic positioning of surgical tools
• Robotic systems for intra-operative camera manipulation
Sectors covered in this report
Source: IDTechEx Report "Innovations in Robotic Surgery 2020-2030"
 
General surgery is perhaps the best known aspect of robotic surgery due to the presence of Intuitive Surgical, the most famous surgical robot company, in this space. Intuitive Surgical's control on the market has forced the diversification of surgical robots as companies are keen to set themselves apart. There are multiple sectors within general surgery in which the company is not active and other manufacturers have targeted in order to distinguish themselves and their technology.
 
Medical instruments like catheters are widely used to conduct an intervention within the heart or blood vessels. Catheter ablation procedures require the wire to be pushed manually and expose surgeons to harmful X-ray radiation. Robotic systems discussed in this report may eliminate the need to manually manipulate the wire. This could greatly improve patient outcomes by increasing the speed and efficiency of the intervention. Surgeons could be in another room or a different city, controlling the device with a joystick, thereby reducing the level of radiation inflicted on them.
 
Robotic systems are increasingly being used to facilitate and optimise the positioning of instruments and tools during surgery. They have proven value in orthopaedic and neurosurgery procedures and are being explored as means to improve laser therapy and biopsy outcomes as well. These systems facilitate operating room workflows by ensuring that surgical tools are inserted at the appropriate angle and depth. The level of precision required often can't be achieved by humans, who are prone to involuntary tremors.
 
Robotic systems for intra-operative camera manipulation are crucial in surgical procedures as they enable surgeons to see the surgical site and their actions within the patient. They provide a stable view of the operating area, avoiding tremors and other disadvantages that occur when the laparoscope is held by a human. These systems negate the need for an assistant, which reduces the cost of surgery.
 
The report explores emerging technologies, highlights key players and provides market analysis for each sector. It only covers robots that are directly involved in performing surgical procedures. For instance, robotic systems designed for pre-operative planning purposes only (i.e.: not used intra-operatively) are not included. In the context of this report, the term surgery refers to minimally invasive surgery. Open surgery is not discussed as robotic systems are rarely used in these procedures. The focus is on disease diagnosis, management and treatment. Therefore, robots performing biopsies are included. However, fields such as robotic cosmetic, hair or dental surgery are not discussed. The report also excludes rehabilitation and physiotherapy robots as they do not perform surgery. The report also includes a description of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and haptic feedback in robotic surgery today.
 
Historical revenue data (2015-2019) for each sector and the key players within them is provided in this report. Forecasts predicting the size of each market in the next decade (2020-2030) are also included. The ten year forecasts are built on information derived from company interviews, financial reports and press releases, among other sources. Parameters used to calculate values include size of the company, product range, number of units sold and pricing. Other factors such as competitive landscape, access to new entrants and regulatory frameworks were used to extrapolate data for the next decade. The report also provides information such as historical revenue data, market drivers & constraints and investments/funding in each sector.

 



ページTOPに戻る


目次

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Report scope
1.2. Sectors of robotic surgery covered in this report
1.3. Drivers of the surgical robots market
1.4. Why use robotic surgery?
1.5. Limitations & barriers to adoption
1.6. Mergers & acquisitions in the robotic surgery space
1.7. Investments into robotic surgery companies
1.8. Intuitive Surgical - Key numbers
1.9. Robotic general surgery - Emerging competitors of da Vinci
1.10. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic general surgery
1.11. Robotic catheter and endoscope navigation
1.12. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic catheter navigation
1.13. Robotic positioning of surgical tools
1.14. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic positioning of surgical tools
1.15. Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
1.16. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
1.17. Market Analysis 2015-2030
1.18. Report summary
1.19. Robotic surgery's multiple benefits have fuelled its rise
1.20. Inherent limitations and conceptual flaws have blocked it
1.21. Competing directly with Intuitive Surgical is highly risky
1.22. Where do the market opportunities lie?
1.23. Does the concept of remote surgery live up to the hype?
1.24. Opportunities for improvement
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1. Report scope
2.2. Open surgery
2.3. Minimally invasive surgery considerably improves recovery time
2.4. Keyhole surgery has non-negligible limitations
2.5. What is robotic surgery?
2.6. History of robotic surgery: an overview
2.7. Early history of robotic surgery
2.8. What operations are surgical robots used for?
2.9. Drivers of the surgical robots market
2.10. Why use robotic surgery?
2.11. Robotic surgery provides enhanced vision
2.12. Limitations & barriers to adoption
2.13. Why are surgical robots so expensive to purchase?
2.14. Regulations & path to market: EU
2.15. Regulations & path to market: USA
2.16. Mergers & acquisitions in the robotic surgery space
2.17. Investments into robotic surgery companies
2.18. Sectors of robotic surgery covered in this report
3. ROBOTIC GENERAL SURGERY
3.1. How does robotic general surgery work?
3.2. Flexible robotic end effectors
3.3. Types of procedures performed by general surgery robots
3.4. Investments into robotic general surgery companies
3.5. Intuitive Surgical - The pioneer of robotic surgery
3.6. Intuitive Surgical - Key numbers
3.7. da Vinci Surgical System
3.8. Approved procedures for da Vinci
3.9. Virtual simulations for robotic surgery training
3.10. Emerging competitors of da Vinci
3.11. Following the da Vinci approach
3.12. Example: TransEnterix
3.13. Example: Avatera
3.14. Example: CMR Surgical
3.15. Example: Titan Medical
3.16. Example: Medtronic
3.17. Flexible arms
3.18. Example: Medrobotics
3.19. Example: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
3.20. Wearable robotic tool for surgery
3.21. Downsizing surgical robots
3.22. Example: Virtual Incision
3.23. Example: Hong Kong Polytechnic University
3.24. Example: Microsure
3.25. Combining conventional and robotic general surgery
3.26. Example: Galen Robotics
3.27. Example: Distalmotion
3.28. Example: Preceyes
3.29. Handheld, mechanical instruments as an alternative to computer-aided surgery
3.30. Example: FlexDex Surgical
3.31. Example: Human Xtensions
3.32. State of development of robotic general surgery systems
3.33. Summary and outlook
4. ROBOTIC CATHETER AND ENDOSCOPE NAVIGATION
4.1. What are catheters and endoscopes?
4.2. Robotic navigation of medical instruments
4.3. Advantages of robotic navigation systems
4.4. Types of intervention
4.5. How does the wire move?
4.6. Investments into robotic catheter navigation companies
4.7. Key players
4.8. Intuitive Surgical
4.9. Example: Auris Health
4.10. Corindus Vascular Robotics
4.11. Robocath
4.12. Moray Medical
4.13. Autonomous active steering: Fraunhofer IPA
4.14. Autonomous active steering: Harvard Medical School
4.15. Magnetic steering
4.16. Magnetic steering: Stereotaxis
4.17. Magnetic steering: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4.18. Magnetic steering: Polytechnique Montréal
4.19. State of development of robotic catheter navigation systems
4.20. Summary and outlook
5. ROBOTIC POSITIONING OF SURGICAL TOOLS
5.1. Robotic guidance and positioning
5.2. Investments into robotic instrument positioning companies
5.3. Sectors and key players
5.4. Robotic orthopaedic surgery
5.5. Key components of robotic orthopaedic systems
5.6. Pre-operative software for procedure planning
5.7. Robotic arm holding the instrument
5.8. 3D cameras for real time instrument tracking
5.9. Example: Stryker
5.10. Example: Medtronic
5.11. Example: Zimmer Biomet
5.12. Example: Smith & Nephew
5.13. Example: Brainlab
5.14. Example: Orthotaxy
5.15. Example: Globus Medical
5.16. Example: Curexo
5.17. Example: Eindhoven Medical Robotics
5.18. Comparison of robotic orthopaedic surgery systems
5.19. Why do large orthopaedic companies seek to acquire surgical robots?
5.20. Robotic neurosurgery
5.21. Example: Renishaw
5.22. Example: Kuka Robotics
5.23. Example: AiM Medical Robotics
5.24. Robotic positioning for laser therapy
5.25. Example: Kuka Robotics
5.26. Example: Zeiss VisuMax
5.27. Robotic biopsy
5.28. Example: XACT
5.29. Example: Machnet Medical Robotics
5.30. State of development of robotic surgical tool positioning systems
5.31. Summary and outlook
6. ROBOTIC SYSTEMS FOR INTRA-OPERATIVE CAMERA MANIPULATION
6.1. Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
6.2. Investments into companies developing intra-operative camera manipulation robots
6.3. Robotic laparoscope holders
6.4. Example: AKTORmed
6.5. Example: OR Productivity
6.6. Example: Storz
6.7. Robotic intra-operative imaging and microscopy
6.8. Example: Brainlab
6.9. Example : Zeiss
6.10. Example: Synaptive Medical
6.11. State of development of robotic intra-operative camera manipulation systems
6.12. Summary and outlook
7. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEMS
7.1. Terminologies explained
7.2. AI enables human-robot interaction
7.3. AI facilitates image-guided robotic surgery
7.4. Challenges of using AI for pre-operative planning
7.5. Challenges of AI-driven robotic instrument positioning
7.6. AI in robotic surgery: Legal and regulatory landscape
8. HAPTIC FEEDBACK MECHANISMS IN ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEMS
8.1. Surgeons must 'sense' what they are doing
8.2. Haptics in robotic surgery
8.3. Haptics enhance robotic surgery systems
8.4. Components of haptic feedback mechanisms
8.5. How is haptic feedback achieved?
8.6. What types of sensors are used?
8.7. Haptic mechanisms: Challenges for robotic surgery
9. MARKET ANALYSIS
9.1. Chapter overview
9.2. Methodology
9.3. The number of robotic surgery companies will rise exponentially in the next decade
9.4. Historical revenue data - Robotic surgery
9.5. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic surgery
9.6. Historical revenue data - Robotic general surgery
9.7. Historical revenue - Intuitive Surgical
9.8. Intuitive Surgical da Vinci systems sold
9.9. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic general surgery
9.10. Historical revenue data - Robotic catheter navigation
9.11. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic catheter navigation
9.12. Historical revenue data - Robotic surgical tool positioning
9.13. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic surgical tool positioning
9.14. Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation: Market share in 2019
9.15. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
10. CONCLUSIONS
10.1. Report summary
10.2. Robotic surgery's multiple benefits have fuelled its rise
10.3. Inherent limitations and conceptual flaws have blocked it
10.4. Competing directly with Intuitive Surgical is highly risky
10.5. Where do the market opportunities lie?
10.6. Does the concept of remote surgery live up to the hype?
10.7. Opportunities for improvement
11. COMPANY PROFILES

 

 

ページTOPに戻る


 

Summary

このレポートはロボット手術市場の新興技術について言及し、主要企業のハイライトや部門ごとの市場分析を行っています。部門や企業の収益データについても掲載しています。
 
Report Details
For centuries, large incisions were the only way to provide surgeons with a full view of the organ they needed to treat. Recovery time for such a taxing procedure is extensive and post-operative complications are a common occurrence. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in operating theatres has drastically improved patient outcomes. Smaller incisions reduce the risk of infection and accelerate recovery. Many studies have shown that MIS procedures result in decreased post-operative hospital stays, a quicker return to the workforce, decreased pain and better immune function.
 
As attractive as MIS is, there are several drawbacks due to the technical and mechanical nature of the equipment. These limitations make minimally invasive procedures more challenging, reduce their efficiency and increase operating time.
 
Robotic surgery was developed to overcome the limitations of MIS and to expand its benefits. It is classified as a type of MIS and involves the use of robotic systems to execute surgical procedures. Although it has been around for over thirty years, robotic surgery is still in its infancy. The market is currently in a rapid state of expansion, however, as it has welcomed dozens of new companies in the last decade. The range of technologies, uses and applications of robotic surgery widens with each new entrant. This field is evolving at a considerable pace and is showing no signs of slowing down. Within the last five years, interest in robotic surgery has soared. Investments in companies operating in this space have skyrocketed since 2016, recording an increase of over 300% in three years, and total investment to date has reached $1.36 billion.
 
History of robotic surgery: an overview
Source: IDTechEx Report "Innovations in Robotic Surgery 2020-2030"
 
This report breaks down the robotic surgery market into four main sectors:
• Robotic general surgery
• Robotic catheter and endoscope navigation
• Robotic positioning of surgical tools
• Robotic systems for intra-operative camera manipulation
Sectors covered in this report
Source: IDTechEx Report "Innovations in Robotic Surgery 2020-2030"
 
General surgery is perhaps the best known aspect of robotic surgery due to the presence of Intuitive Surgical, the most famous surgical robot company, in this space. Intuitive Surgical's control on the market has forced the diversification of surgical robots as companies are keen to set themselves apart. There are multiple sectors within general surgery in which the company is not active and other manufacturers have targeted in order to distinguish themselves and their technology.
 
Medical instruments like catheters are widely used to conduct an intervention within the heart or blood vessels. Catheter ablation procedures require the wire to be pushed manually and expose surgeons to harmful X-ray radiation. Robotic systems discussed in this report may eliminate the need to manually manipulate the wire. This could greatly improve patient outcomes by increasing the speed and efficiency of the intervention. Surgeons could be in another room or a different city, controlling the device with a joystick, thereby reducing the level of radiation inflicted on them.
 
Robotic systems are increasingly being used to facilitate and optimise the positioning of instruments and tools during surgery. They have proven value in orthopaedic and neurosurgery procedures and are being explored as means to improve laser therapy and biopsy outcomes as well. These systems facilitate operating room workflows by ensuring that surgical tools are inserted at the appropriate angle and depth. The level of precision required often can't be achieved by humans, who are prone to involuntary tremors.
 
Robotic systems for intra-operative camera manipulation are crucial in surgical procedures as they enable surgeons to see the surgical site and their actions within the patient. They provide a stable view of the operating area, avoiding tremors and other disadvantages that occur when the laparoscope is held by a human. These systems negate the need for an assistant, which reduces the cost of surgery.
 
The report explores emerging technologies, highlights key players and provides market analysis for each sector. It only covers robots that are directly involved in performing surgical procedures. For instance, robotic systems designed for pre-operative planning purposes only (i.e.: not used intra-operatively) are not included. In the context of this report, the term surgery refers to minimally invasive surgery. Open surgery is not discussed as robotic systems are rarely used in these procedures. The focus is on disease diagnosis, management and treatment. Therefore, robots performing biopsies are included. However, fields such as robotic cosmetic, hair or dental surgery are not discussed. The report also excludes rehabilitation and physiotherapy robots as they do not perform surgery. The report also includes a description of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and haptic feedback in robotic surgery today.
 
Historical revenue data (2015-2019) for each sector and the key players within them is provided in this report. Forecasts predicting the size of each market in the next decade (2020-2030) are also included. The ten year forecasts are built on information derived from company interviews, financial reports and press releases, among other sources. Parameters used to calculate values include size of the company, product range, number of units sold and pricing. Other factors such as competitive landscape, access to new entrants and regulatory frameworks were used to extrapolate data for the next decade. The report also provides information such as historical revenue data, market drivers & constraints and investments/funding in each sector.

 



ページTOPに戻る


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Report scope
1.2. Sectors of robotic surgery covered in this report
1.3. Drivers of the surgical robots market
1.4. Why use robotic surgery?
1.5. Limitations & barriers to adoption
1.6. Mergers & acquisitions in the robotic surgery space
1.7. Investments into robotic surgery companies
1.8. Intuitive Surgical - Key numbers
1.9. Robotic general surgery - Emerging competitors of da Vinci
1.10. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic general surgery
1.11. Robotic catheter and endoscope navigation
1.12. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic catheter navigation
1.13. Robotic positioning of surgical tools
1.14. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic positioning of surgical tools
1.15. Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
1.16. Conclusions and outlook - Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
1.17. Market Analysis 2015-2030
1.18. Report summary
1.19. Robotic surgery's multiple benefits have fuelled its rise
1.20. Inherent limitations and conceptual flaws have blocked it
1.21. Competing directly with Intuitive Surgical is highly risky
1.22. Where do the market opportunities lie?
1.23. Does the concept of remote surgery live up to the hype?
1.24. Opportunities for improvement
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1. Report scope
2.2. Open surgery
2.3. Minimally invasive surgery considerably improves recovery time
2.4. Keyhole surgery has non-negligible limitations
2.5. What is robotic surgery?
2.6. History of robotic surgery: an overview
2.7. Early history of robotic surgery
2.8. What operations are surgical robots used for?
2.9. Drivers of the surgical robots market
2.10. Why use robotic surgery?
2.11. Robotic surgery provides enhanced vision
2.12. Limitations & barriers to adoption
2.13. Why are surgical robots so expensive to purchase?
2.14. Regulations & path to market: EU
2.15. Regulations & path to market: USA
2.16. Mergers & acquisitions in the robotic surgery space
2.17. Investments into robotic surgery companies
2.18. Sectors of robotic surgery covered in this report
3. ROBOTIC GENERAL SURGERY
3.1. How does robotic general surgery work?
3.2. Flexible robotic end effectors
3.3. Types of procedures performed by general surgery robots
3.4. Investments into robotic general surgery companies
3.5. Intuitive Surgical - The pioneer of robotic surgery
3.6. Intuitive Surgical - Key numbers
3.7. da Vinci Surgical System
3.8. Approved procedures for da Vinci
3.9. Virtual simulations for robotic surgery training
3.10. Emerging competitors of da Vinci
3.11. Following the da Vinci approach
3.12. Example: TransEnterix
3.13. Example: Avatera
3.14. Example: CMR Surgical
3.15. Example: Titan Medical
3.16. Example: Medtronic
3.17. Flexible arms
3.18. Example: Medrobotics
3.19. Example: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
3.20. Wearable robotic tool for surgery
3.21. Downsizing surgical robots
3.22. Example: Virtual Incision
3.23. Example: Hong Kong Polytechnic University
3.24. Example: Microsure
3.25. Combining conventional and robotic general surgery
3.26. Example: Galen Robotics
3.27. Example: Distalmotion
3.28. Example: Preceyes
3.29. Handheld, mechanical instruments as an alternative to computer-aided surgery
3.30. Example: FlexDex Surgical
3.31. Example: Human Xtensions
3.32. State of development of robotic general surgery systems
3.33. Summary and outlook
4. ROBOTIC CATHETER AND ENDOSCOPE NAVIGATION
4.1. What are catheters and endoscopes?
4.2. Robotic navigation of medical instruments
4.3. Advantages of robotic navigation systems
4.4. Types of intervention
4.5. How does the wire move?
4.6. Investments into robotic catheter navigation companies
4.7. Key players
4.8. Intuitive Surgical
4.9. Example: Auris Health
4.10. Corindus Vascular Robotics
4.11. Robocath
4.12. Moray Medical
4.13. Autonomous active steering: Fraunhofer IPA
4.14. Autonomous active steering: Harvard Medical School
4.15. Magnetic steering
4.16. Magnetic steering: Stereotaxis
4.17. Magnetic steering: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4.18. Magnetic steering: Polytechnique Montréal
4.19. State of development of robotic catheter navigation systems
4.20. Summary and outlook
5. ROBOTIC POSITIONING OF SURGICAL TOOLS
5.1. Robotic guidance and positioning
5.2. Investments into robotic instrument positioning companies
5.3. Sectors and key players
5.4. Robotic orthopaedic surgery
5.5. Key components of robotic orthopaedic systems
5.6. Pre-operative software for procedure planning
5.7. Robotic arm holding the instrument
5.8. 3D cameras for real time instrument tracking
5.9. Example: Stryker
5.10. Example: Medtronic
5.11. Example: Zimmer Biomet
5.12. Example: Smith & Nephew
5.13. Example: Brainlab
5.14. Example: Orthotaxy
5.15. Example: Globus Medical
5.16. Example: Curexo
5.17. Example: Eindhoven Medical Robotics
5.18. Comparison of robotic orthopaedic surgery systems
5.19. Why do large orthopaedic companies seek to acquire surgical robots?
5.20. Robotic neurosurgery
5.21. Example: Renishaw
5.22. Example: Kuka Robotics
5.23. Example: AiM Medical Robotics
5.24. Robotic positioning for laser therapy
5.25. Example: Kuka Robotics
5.26. Example: Zeiss VisuMax
5.27. Robotic biopsy
5.28. Example: XACT
5.29. Example: Machnet Medical Robotics
5.30. State of development of robotic surgical tool positioning systems
5.31. Summary and outlook
6. ROBOTIC SYSTEMS FOR INTRA-OPERATIVE CAMERA MANIPULATION
6.1. Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
6.2. Investments into companies developing intra-operative camera manipulation robots
6.3. Robotic laparoscope holders
6.4. Example: AKTORmed
6.5. Example: OR Productivity
6.6. Example: Storz
6.7. Robotic intra-operative imaging and microscopy
6.8. Example: Brainlab
6.9. Example : Zeiss
6.10. Example: Synaptive Medical
6.11. State of development of robotic intra-operative camera manipulation systems
6.12. Summary and outlook
7. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEMS
7.1. Terminologies explained
7.2. AI enables human-robot interaction
7.3. AI facilitates image-guided robotic surgery
7.4. Challenges of using AI for pre-operative planning
7.5. Challenges of AI-driven robotic instrument positioning
7.6. AI in robotic surgery: Legal and regulatory landscape
8. HAPTIC FEEDBACK MECHANISMS IN ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEMS
8.1. Surgeons must 'sense' what they are doing
8.2. Haptics in robotic surgery
8.3. Haptics enhance robotic surgery systems
8.4. Components of haptic feedback mechanisms
8.5. How is haptic feedback achieved?
8.6. What types of sensors are used?
8.7. Haptic mechanisms: Challenges for robotic surgery
9. MARKET ANALYSIS
9.1. Chapter overview
9.2. Methodology
9.3. The number of robotic surgery companies will rise exponentially in the next decade
9.4. Historical revenue data - Robotic surgery
9.5. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic surgery
9.6. Historical revenue data - Robotic general surgery
9.7. Historical revenue - Intuitive Surgical
9.8. Intuitive Surgical da Vinci systems sold
9.9. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic general surgery
9.10. Historical revenue data - Robotic catheter navigation
9.11. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic catheter navigation
9.12. Historical revenue data - Robotic surgical tool positioning
9.13. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic surgical tool positioning
9.14. Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation: Market share in 2019
9.15. Forecast 2020-2030 - Robotic intra-operative camera manipulation
10. CONCLUSIONS
10.1. Report summary
10.2. Robotic surgery's multiple benefits have fuelled its rise
10.3. Inherent limitations and conceptual flaws have blocked it
10.4. Competing directly with Intuitive Surgical is highly risky
10.5. Where do the market opportunities lie?
10.6. Does the concept of remote surgery live up to the hype?
10.7. Opportunities for improvement
11. COMPANY PROFILES

 

 

ページTOPに戻る

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

webからのご注文・お問合せはこちらのフォームから承ります

本レポートと同分野(SaaS(Software as a Service))の最新刊レポート

本レポートと同じKEY WORD()の最新刊レポート

  • 本レポートと同じKEY WORDの最新刊レポートはありません。

よくあるご質問


IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?


IDTechExはセンサ技術や3D印刷、電気自動車などの先端技術・材料市場を対象に広範かつ詳細な調査を行っています。データリソースはIDTechExの調査レポートおよび委託調査(個別調査)を取り扱う日... もっと見る


調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?


在庫のあるものは速納となりますが、平均的には 3-4日と見て下さい。
但し、一部の調査レポートでは、発注を受けた段階で内容更新をして納品をする場合もあります。
発注をする前のお問合せをお願いします。


注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?


1)お客様からの御問い合わせをいただきます。
2)見積書やサンプルの提示をいたします。
3)お客様指定、もしくは弊社の発注書をメール添付にて発送してください。
4)データリソース社からレポート発行元の調査会社へ納品手配します。
5) 調査会社からお客様へ納品されます。最近は、pdfにてのメール納品が大半です。


お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?


納品と同時にデータリソース社よりお客様へ請求書(必要に応じて納品書も)を発送いたします。
お客様よりデータリソース社へ(通常は円払い)の御振り込みをお願いします。
請求書は、納品日の日付で発行しますので、翌月最終営業日までの当社指定口座への振込みをお願いします。振込み手数料は御社負担にてお願いします。
お客様の御支払い条件が60日以上の場合は御相談ください。
尚、初めてのお取引先や個人の場合、前払いをお願いすることもあります。ご了承のほど、お願いします。


データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?


当社は、世界各国の主要調査会社・レポート出版社と提携し、世界各国の市場調査レポートや技術動向レポートなどを日本国内の企業・公官庁及び教育研究機関に提供しております。
世界各国の「市場・技術・法規制などの」実情を調査・収集される時には、データリソース社にご相談ください。
お客様の御要望にあったデータや情報を抽出する為のレポート紹介や調査のアドバイスも致します。



詳細検索

このレポートへのお問合せ

03-3582-2531

電話お問合せもお気軽に

 

2024/12/20 10:28

158.95 円

165.20 円

201.28 円

ページTOPに戻る