Summary

Overview
U.S. and Canada Nitrification and Urease Inhibitors Market reached US$ 452.1 million in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 608.3 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 3.7% during the forecast period 2023-2030.
With the adoption of modern farming techniques in the US and Canada, the demand for agrochemicals has surged to increase the crop yield, which is a major driving factor for the growth of the nitrification inhibitors market. Nitrification inhibitors delay the nitrification of applied nitrogen in soils by temporarily suppressing the oxidation of ammonium nitrogen.
They are an effective means of reducing environmental problems related to nitrate in agricultural soils and increasing the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen. Although several chemicals are known to reduce the rate of nitrification, only a few comply with the requirements for commercial products.
In January 2023, Soilgenic Technologies, a Canadian company launched Visio-N Supra technology, which contains 40% NBPT. The creation of the Visio-N Supra 40% NBPT formulation establishes a new benchmark for concentrated urease inhibitor technology's increased efficiency.
Dynamics
Emphasis on Agriculture Productivity and Food Security
Food security can contribute to rising food prices in the U.S. and Canada through several interconnected mechanisms. The U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics reports that urban Americans' food costs climbed by 11.4% in the year that ended in August 2022. Hence, there is an increasing need to enhance agricultural productivity to meet growing food demand. Farmers in the U.S. and Canada are recognizing the role of nitrification and urease inhibitors in optimizing nutrient use efficiency, thereby contributing to higher crop yields.
The adoption of inhibitors aligns to ensure food security by minimizing nutrient losses. By efficiently managing nitrogen application through inhibitors, farmers can prevent leaching and runoff, preserving valuable nutrients in the soil. This not only improves the overall health of crops but also supports sustainable agricultural practices that contribute to long-term food security.
Increased Awareness of Environmental Impact
Increased awareness of environmental impact is a significant driver for the growth of the nitrification and urease inhibitors market in the U.S. and Canada. Firstly, heightened environmental consciousness among farmers and policymakers has led to a growing emphasis on sustainable agricultural practices. Farmers in these regions are increasingly recognizing the importance of minimizing nitrogen runoff, which can harm water quality and ecosystems.
Secondly, stringent regulations on fertilizer usage, driven by environmental concerns, have fueled the demand for nitrification and urease inhibitors. These regulations aim to reduce nitrogen losses and enhance nutrient use efficiency, aligning with the broader goal of sustainable agriculture. Farmers are motivated to adopt inhibitors as a proactive measure to comply with these regulations while optimizing fertilizer effectiveness.
Cost Concerns and Limited Awareness
The initial investment required for purchasing inhibitors can be a deterrent for some farmers, especially smaller ones with limited financial resources. The perceived high cost of these inhibitors may hinder widespread adoption. Lack of awareness and understanding among farmers about the benefits and proper usage of nitrification and urease inhibitors can impede market growth. Education and outreach efforts are crucial to overcoming this barrier.
Segment Analysis
The U.S. and Canada nitrification and urease inhibitors Market is segmented based on type, nutrient, crops, method and region.
Effectiveness of Nitrification Inhibitors in Minimizing Nitrogen Loss and Promoting Sustainable Agriculture Practices
Nitrification inhibitors primarily address the issue of nitrogen management in soil. Given the importance of efficient nitrogen use in agriculture, farmers in the U.S. and Canada prioritize inhibitors that specifically target nitrification processes. Stringent environmental regulations often focus on nitrogen runoff control. Nitrification inhibitors help mitigate nitrogen leaching, aligning with regulatory requirements and environmental sustainability goals in both countries.
ICL company produces Nova Complex Optima. It contains a state-of-the-art nitrification inhibitor (DMPP) to reduce nitrogen loss from leaching and to improve the supply of nitrogen, also designed to let you control the risk of nitrate leaching, which is vital in preventing groundwater contamination.
Geographical Penetration
United States’s Adoption of Advanced Agricultural Products
The major market drivers in the US are the easy application and the availability of nitrification inhibitors. Additionally, the high adoption of precision agriculture technology is driving market growth, as the use of variable rate technology (VRT) requires the use of liquid fertilizers. In the U.S., products that contain DCD include Guardian DF, Guardian-DL 31-0-0, Guardian-LP 15-0-0, Agrotain Plus, and Super U. Guardian-DF and Guardian-DL are intended for application with Nitrogen solutions or liquid manure. In addition, Guardian DF can be impregnated with dry Nitrogen fertilizers.
In March 2023, MoFCB, Missouri Fertilizer Control Board, finished the research on urease and nitrification inhibitors for 4R goals in tall fescue, The study's goal was to compare the effects of urea and ammonium nitrate with urease and nitrification inhibitors on the production of tall fescue fodder in the spring, summer, and autumn.
COVID-19 Impact Analysis
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the nitrification and urease inhibitors market in both the U.S. and Canada. Disruptions in supply chains, labor shortages, and economic uncertainties led to a slowdown in agricultural activities. Farmers faced challenges in accessing necessary inputs, hindering the adoption of inhibitors. Lockdowns and restrictions further affected the distribution and availability of these products.
However, the awareness of sustainable agricultural practices grew during the pandemic, fostering interest in nitrification and urease inhibitors. Increased environmental consciousness and a focus on optimizing fertilizer use became key drivers. Governments also promoted initiatives for sustainable agriculture, positively influencing the market.
By Type
• Nitrification Inhibitor
o Nitrapyrin
o Dicyandiamide (DCD)
o DMPP
o Others
• Urease Inhibitors
o Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA)
o N-(2-Nitrophenyl) phosphoric triamide (NPPT)
o N-(n-Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBTPT or NBPT)
o Others
By Nutrient
• Nitrogen
• Ammonia
• Nitrate
• Urea
• Others
By Crops
• Cereals, Millets & Oilseeds
• Cotton
• Fruits & Vegetables
• Plantation Crops
• Pulses
By Method
• Fertigation
• Foliar
By Region
• North America
o U.S.
o Canada
o Mexico
• Europe
o Germany
o UK
o France
o Italy
o Russia
o Rest of Europe
• South America
o Brazil
o Argentina
o Rest of South America
• Asia-Pacific
o China
o India
o Japan
o Australia
o Rest of Asia-Pacific
• Middle East and Africa
Key Developments
• In November 2022, OMEX introduced NitroShield, a new urease inhibitor to reduce ammonia emissions. NitroShield has been shown to minimize ammonia emissions from fertilizers containing urea by over 70%. It can also increase grain protein by 0.2% and winter wheat yields by 0.3 t/ha.
• In November 2023, BASF and Yunnan Yuntianhua Co., Ltd., introduced a pilot project to verify the reduction of CO2e emissions from the use of Yuntianhua’s stabilized urea fertilizer containing BASF’s urease inhibitor Limus. The program expansion is expected to create opportunities globally including U.S. and Canada.
Competitive Landscape
The major global players in the market include BASF SE, COMPO EXPERT GmbH, Koch Agronomic Services, Nico Orgo, Solvay, J.R. Simplot Company, Arclin, Inc., Avantor. Hach, Sycamore Life Sciences, LLC.
Why Purchase the Report?
• To visualize the U.S. and Canada nitrification and urease inhibitors market segmentation based on type, nutrient, crops, and method, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
• Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
• Excel data sheet with numerous data points of nitrification and urease inhibitors market-level with all segments.
• PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
• Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.
The U.S. and Canada nitrification and urease inhibitors Market report would provide approximately 45 tables, 37 figures and 167 Pages.
Target Audience 2023
• Manufacturers/ Buyers
• Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
• Research Professionals
• Emerging Companies

ページTOPに戻る

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report
2. Definition and Overview
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Snippet by Type
3.2. Snippet by Nutrient
3.3. Snippet by Crops
3.4. Snippet by Method
3.5. Snippet by Region
4. Dynamics
4.1. Impacting Factors
4.1.1. Drivers
4.1.1.1. Emphasis on Agriculture Productivity and Food Security
4.1.1.2. Increased Awareness of Environmental Impact
4.1.2. Restraints
4.1.2.1. Cost Concerns and Limited Awareness
4.1.3. Opportunity
4.1.4. Impact Analysis
5. Industry Analysis
5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis
5.5. Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
5.6. DMI Opinion
6. COVID-19 Analysis
6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6. Conclusion
7. By Type
7.1. Introduction
7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
7.2. Nitrification Inhibitor*
7.2.1. Introduction
7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.2.3. Nitrapyrin
7.2.4. Dicyandiamide (DCD)
7.2.5. DMPP
7.2.6. Others
7.3. Urease Inhibitors
7.3.1. Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD/PPDA)
7.3.2. N-(2-Nitrophenyl) phosphoric triamide (NPPT)
7.3.3. N-(n-Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBTPT or NBPT)
7.3.4. Others
8. By Nutrient
8.1. Introduction
8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Nutrient
8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Nutrient
8.2. Nitrogen *
8.2.1. Introduction
8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Ammonia
8.4. Nitrate
8.5. Urea
8.6. Others
9. By Crops
9.1. Introduction
9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crops
9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Crops
9.2. Cereals, Millets & Oilseeds*
9.2.1. Introduction
9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3. Cotton
9.4. Fruits & Vegetables
9.5. Plantation Crops
9.6. Pulses
10. By Method
10.1. Introduction
10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Method
10.2. Fertigation*
10.2.1. Introduction
10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
10.3. Foliar
11. By Country
11.1. Introduction
11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Country
11.2. U.S.
11.2.1. Introduction
11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Nutrient
11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crops
11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
11.3. Canada
11.3.1. Introduction
11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Nutrient
11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crops
11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
12. Competitive Landscape
12.1. Competitive Scenario
12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis
13. Company Profiles
13.1. BASF SE*
13.1.1. Company Overview
13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
13.1.3. Financial Overview
13.1.4. Key Developments
13.2. COMPO EXPERT GmbH
13.3. Koch Agronomic Services
13.4. Nico Orgo
13.5. Solvay
13.6. J.R. Simplot Company
13.7. Arclin, Inc.
13.8. Avantor
13.9. Hach
13.10. Sycamore Life Sciences, LLC.
LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE
14. Appendix
14.1. About Us and Services
14.2. Contact Us