1. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. |
Classifications of solid-state electrolytes |
1.2. |
Liquid vs. solid-state batteries |
1.3. |
Thin film vs. bulk solid-state batteries |
1.4. |
SSB company commercial plans |
1.5. |
Solid state battery collaborations / investment by Automotive OEMs |
1.6. |
Status and future of solid state battery business |
1.7. |
Resources considerations |
1.8. |
Analysis of different features of SSBs |
1.9. |
Location overview of major solid-state battery companies |
1.10. |
Solid-state battery partnerships |
1.11. |
Summary of solid-state electrolyte technology |
1.12. |
Comparison of solid-state electrolyte systems 1 |
1.13. |
Comparison of solid-state electrolyte systems 2 |
1.14. |
Current electrolyte challenges and possible solution |
1.15. |
Technology summary of various companies |
1.16. |
Solid-state battery value chain |
1.17. |
Market forecast methodology |
1.18. |
Assumptions and analysis of market forecast of SSB |
1.19. |
Price forecast of solid state battery for various applications |
1.20. |
Solid-state battery addressable market size |
1.21. |
Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by application (GWh) |
1.22. |
Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by application (market value) |
1.23. |
Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by technology (GWh) |
1.24. |
Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by technology (GWh) |
1.25. |
Market size segmentation in 2023 and 2028 |
1.26. |
Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 for car plug in |
2. |
INTRODUCTION TO SOLID-STATE BATTERIES |
2.1. |
What is a solid-state battery |
2.1.1. |
Introduction |
2.1.2. |
Classifications of solid-state electrolytes |
2.1.3. |
A solid future? |
2.1.4. |
History of solid-state batteries |
2.1.5. |
Milestone of solid-state battery development |
2.1.6. |
Solid-state electrolytes |
2.1.7. |
Requirements for solid-state electrolyte with multifunctions |
2.2. |
Interests and Activities on Solid-State Batteries |
2.2.1. |
How to design a good solid-state electrolyte |
2.2.2. |
Energy storage evolvement |
2.2.3. |
Solid-state battery publication dynamics |
2.2.4. |
Regional efforts: USA |
2.2.5. |
Regional efforts: Japan |
2.2.6. |
Regional efforts: South Korea |
2.2.7. |
Battery vendors' efforts - Samsung SDI |
2.2.8. |
Samsung's commercial efforts |
2.2.9. |
LG's contributions |
2.2.10. |
Regional efforts: China |
2.2.11. |
Interests in China |
2.2.12. |
14 Other Chinese player activities on solid state batteries |
2.2.13. |
Chinese car player activities on solid-state batteries |
2.2.14. |
Regional efforts: UK |
2.2.15. |
Regional efforts: Others |
2.2.16. |
Automakers' efforts - BMW |
2.2.17. |
Mercedes-Benz's inhouse cell development |
2.2.18. |
Automakers' efforts - Volkswagen |
2.2.19. |
Volkswagen's investment in electric vehicle batteries |
2.2.20. |
Automakers' efforts - Hyundai |
3. |
SOLID-STATE BATTERIES, HOPE OR HYPE?—CONTROVERSIAL OPINIONS ON SOLID-STATE BATTERIES |
3.1. |
Introduction |
3.1.1. |
Value propositions of solid-state batteries |
3.1.2. |
Negative opinions on solid-state batteries |
3.2. |
Better Safety? |
3.2.1. |
Typical hypes of solid-state batteries |
3.2.2. |
Safety consideration |
3.2.3. |
Safety of liquid-electrolyte lithium-ion batteries |
3.2.4. |
Modern horror films are finding their scares in dead phone batteries |
3.2.5. |
Samsung's Firegate |
3.2.6. |
LIB cell temperature and likely outcome |
3.2.7. |
Safety aspects of Li-ion batteries |
3.2.8. |
Are solid-state battery safer? |
3.2.9. |
Conclusions of SSB safety |
3.3. |
Higher Energy Density? |
3.3.1. |
How do SSBs help with energy density |
3.3.2. |
Energy density improvement |
3.3.3. |
Solid state battery does not always lead to higher energy density |
3.3.4. |
Specific energy comparison of different electrolytes |
3.3.5. |
Alternative anode is required for high energy density |
3.3.6. |
Lithium metal anode |
3.3.7. |
Where is lithium? |
3.3.8. |
How to produce lithium |
3.3.9. |
Lithium hydroxide vs. lithium carbonate |
3.3.10. |
Lithium-metal battery approaches |
3.3.11. |
Failure story about metallic lithium anode |
3.3.12. |
Lithium metal challenge |
3.3.13. |
Dendrite formation: Current density |
3.3.14. |
Dendrite formation: Pressure and temperature |
3.3.15. |
Cycling preference for anode-free lithium metal cells |
3.3.16. |
Solid-state battery with lithium metal anode |
3.3.17. |
Lithium in solid-state batteries |
3.3.18. |
Lithium metal foils |
3.3.19. |
Silicon anode |
3.3.20. |
Introduction to silicon anode |
3.3.21. |
Value proposition of silicon anodes |
3.3.22. |
Comparison between graphite and silicon |
3.3.23. |
Solutions for silicon incorporation |
3.3.24. |
Silicon anode for solid-state electrolyte |
3.3.25. |
Conclusions of solid-state battery energy density |
3.4. |
Fast Charging? |
3.4.1. |
Fast charging at each stage |
3.4.2. |
The importance of battery feature for fast charging |
3.4.3. |
Fast charging for solid-state batteries |
3.5. |
Reality of Solid-State Batteries |
3.5.1. |
Analysis of different features of SSBs |
4. |
SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTE |
4.1. |
Introduction |
4.1.1. |
Solid-state electrolyte landscape |
4.2. |
Solid Polymer Electrolyte |
4.2.1. |
LiPo batteries, polymer-based batteries, polymeric batteries |
4.2.2. |
Types of polymer electrolytes |
4.2.3. |
Electrolytic polymer options |
4.2.4. |
Advantages and issues of polymer electrolytes |
4.2.5. |
PEO for solid polymer electrolyte |
4.2.6. |
Companies working on polymer solid state batteries |
4.3. |
Solid Oxide Inorganic Electrolytes |
4.3.1. |
Oxide electrolyte |
4.3.2. |
Garnet |
4.3.3. |
Estimated cost projection for LLZO-based SSB |
4.3.4. |
NASICON-type |
4.3.5. |
Perovskite |
4.3.6. |
LiPON |
4.3.7. |
LiPON: construction |
4.3.8. |
Players worked and working LiPON-based batteries |
4.3.9. |
Cathode material options for LiPON-based batteries |
4.3.10. |
Anodes for LiPON-based batteries |
4.3.11. |
Substrate options for LiPON-based batteries |
4.3.12. |
Trend of materials and processes of thin-film battery in different companies |
4.3.13. |
LiPON: capacity increase |
4.3.14. |
Comparison of inorganic oxide solid-state electrolyte |
4.3.15. |
Thermal stability of oxide electrolyte with lithium metal |
4.3.16. |
Companies working on oxide solid state batteries |
4.4. |
Solid Sulfide Inorganic Electrolytes |
4.4.1. |
LISICON-type 1 |
4.4.2. |
LISICON-type 2 |
4.4.3. |
Argyrodite |
4.4.4. |
Companies working on sulphide solid state batteries |
4.5. |
Composite Electrolytes |
4.5.1. |
The best of both worlds? |
4.5.2. |
Common hybrid electrolyte concept |
4.6. |
Other Electrolytes |
4.6.1. |
Li-hydrides |
4.6.2. |
Li-halides |
4.7. |
Electrolyte analysis and comparison |
4.7.1. |
Technology evaluation |
4.7.2. |
Technology evaluation (continued) |
4.7.3. |
Types of solid inorganic electrolytes for Li-ion |
4.7.4. |
Advantages and issues with inorganic electrolytes 1 |
4.7.5. |
Advantages and issues with inorganic electrolytes 2 |
4.7.6. |
Advantages and issues with inorganic electrolytes 3 |
4.7.7. |
Dendrites prevention |
4.7.8. |
Comparison between inorganic and polymer electrolytes 1 |
4.7.9. |
Comparison between inorganic and polymer electrolytes 2 |
5. |
FROM CELLS DESIGN TO SYSTEM DESIGN FOR SOLID-STATE BATTERIES |
5.1. |
Solid-State Battery Cell Design |
5.1.1. |
Commercial battery form factors 1 |
5.1.2. |
Commercial battery form factors 2 |
5.1.3. |
Battery configurations 1 |
5.1.4. |
Battery configurations 2 |
5.1.5. |
Cell stacking options |
5.1.6. |
Bipolar cells |
5.1.7. |
ProLogium's bipolar design |
5.1.8. |
"Anode-free" batteries |
5.1.9. |
Challenges of anode free batteries |
5.1.10. |
Close stacking |
5.1.11. |
Flexibility and customisation provided by solid-state batteries |
5.1.12. |
Cell size trend |
5.1.13. |
Cell design ideas |
5.2. |
From Cell to Pack |
5.2.1. |
Pack parameters mean more than cell's |
5.2.2. |
The importance of a pack system |
5.2.3. |
Influence of the CTP design |
5.2.4. |
BYD's blade battery: overview |
5.2.5. |
BYD's blade battery: structure and composition |
5.2.6. |
BYD's blade battery: design |
5.2.7. |
BYD's blade battery: pack layout |
5.2.8. |
BYD's blade battery: energy density improvement |
5.2.9. |
BYD's blade battery: thermal safety |
5.2.10. |
BYD's blade battery: structural safety |
5.2.11. |
Cost and performance |
5.2.12. |
BYD's blade battery: what CTP indicates |
5.2.13. |
CATL's CTP design |
5.2.14. |
CATL's CTP battery evolution |
5.2.15. |
CATL's Qilin Battery |
5.2.16. |
From cell to pack for conventional Li-ions |
5.2.17. |
Solid-state batteries: From cell to pack |
5.2.18. |
Bipolar-enabled CTP |
5.2.19. |
Conventional design vs. bipolar cell design |
5.2.20. |
EV battery pack assembly |
5.2.21. |
ProLogium: "MAB" EV battery pack assembly |
5.2.22. |
MAB idea to increase assembly utilization |
5.2.23. |
Solid-state battery: Competing at pack level |
5.2.24. |
Business models between battery-auto companies |
5.3. |
Battery Management System for Solid-State Batteries |
5.3.1. |
The importance of a battery management system |
5.3.2. |
Functions of a BMS |
5.3.3. |
BMS subsystems |
5.3.4. |
Cell control |
5.3.5. |
Cooling technology comparison |
5.3.6. |
BMS designs with different geometries |
5.3.7. |
Qilin Battery's thermal management system |
5.3.8. |
Thermal conductivity of the cells |
5.3.9. |
Cell connection |
5.3.10. |
BMS design considerations for SSBs |
6. |
SOLID-STATE BATTERY MANUFACTURING |
6.1. |
Timeline for mass production |
6.2. |
Conventional Li-ion battery cell production process |
6.3. |
The incumbent process: lamination |
6.4. |
Conventional Li-ion battery manufacturing conditions |
6.5. |
General manufacturing differences between conventional Li-ion and SSBs |
6.6. |
Process chains for solid electrolyte fabrication |
6.7. |
Process chains for anode fabrication |
6.8. |
Process chains for cathode fabrication |
6.9. |
Process chains for cell assembly |
6.10. |
Exemplary manufacturing processes |
6.11. |
Possible processing routes of solid-state battery components fabrication |
6.12. |
Are mass production coming? |
6.13. |
Pouch cells |
6.14. |
Techniques to fabricate aluminium laminated sheets |
6.15. |
Packaging procedures for pouch cells 1 |
6.16. |
Packaging procedures for pouch cells 2 |
6.17. |
Oxide electrolyte thickness and processing temperatures |
6.18. |
Solid battery fabrication process |
6.19. |
Manufacturing equipment for solid-state batteries |
6.20. |
Industrial-scale fabrication of Li metal polymer batteries |
6.21. |
Are thin film electrolytes viable? |
6.22. |
Summary of main fabrication technique for thin film batteries |
6.23. |
Wet-chemical & vacuum-based deposition methods for Li-oxide thin films |
6.24. |
Current processing methods and challenges for mass manufacturing of Li-oxide thin-film materials |
6.25. |
PVD processes for thin-film batteries 1 |
6.26. |
PVD processes for thin-film batteries 2 |
6.27. |
PVD processes for thin-film batteries 3 |
6.28. |
Ilika's PVD approach |
6.29. |
Avenues for manufacturing |
6.30. |
Toyota's approach 1 |
6.31. |
Toyota's approach 2 |
6.32. |
Hitachi Zosen's approach |
6.33. |
Sakti3's PVD approach |
6.34. |
Planar Energy's approach |
6.35. |
Typical manufacturing method of the all solid-state battery (SMD type) |
6.36. |
ProLogium's LCB manufacturing processes |
6.37. |
ProLogium's manufacturing processes |
6.38. |
Solid Power: Fabrication of cathode and electrolyte |
6.39. |
Solid Power cell production |
6.40. |
Pilot production facility of Solid Power |
6.41. |
Qingtao's manufacturing processes |
6.42. |
Yichun 1GWh facility equipment and capacity |
6.43. |
Introduction to dry electrode manufacturing |
6.44. |
Dry battery electrode fabrication |
6.45. |
Dry electrode binders |
6.46. |
Comparison between wet slurry and dry electrode processes |
7. |
SOLID-STATE BATTERIES BEYOND LI-ION |
7.1. |
Solid-state electrolytes in lithium-sulphur batteries |
7.2. |
Lithium sulphur solid electrode development phases |
7.3. |
Solid-state electrolytes in lithium-air batteries |
7.4. |
Solid-state electrolytes in metal-air batteries |
7.5. |
Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-ion batteries 1 |
7.6. |
Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-ion batteries 2 |
7.7. |
Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-sulphur batteries 1 |
7.8. |
Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-sulphur batteries 2 |
8. |
RECYCLING |
8.1. |
Global policy summary on Li-ion battery recycling |
8.2. |
Battery geometry for recycling |
8.3. |
Lack of pack standardisation |
8.4. |
LIB recycling approaches overview |
8.5. |
Recycling categories |
8.6. |
Recycling of SSBs |
8.7. |
Recycling plan of ProLogium |
9. |
POLICIES, REGULATIONS AND GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT |
9.1. |
Introduction |
9.1.1. |
Roadmap for battery cell technology |
9.1.2. |
Technology roadmap according to Germany's NPE |
9.1.3. |
Worldwide battery target roadmap |
9.1.4. |
Solid-state battery roadmap to 2035 |
9.1.5. |
Material to cell roadmap |
9.1.6. |
Cell to application roadmap |
9.1.7. |
Global electrification commitments |
9.1.8. |
Factors affecting the European market 1 |
9.1.9. |
Factors affecting the European market 2 |
9.1.10. |
Factors affecting the European market 3 |
9.2. |
Standards/Policies/Regulations for Automotive Applications |
9.2.1. |
Global environment |
9.2.2. |
Standardisation and legislative framework |
9.2.3. |
Global Standardization and Regulation |
9.2.4. |
International Organizations |
9.2.5. |
Relevant National Organizations |
9.2.6. |
UN 38.3 |
9.2.7. |
IEC - 61960 |
9.2.8. |
IEC 61960 - 3 &4 |
9.2.9. |
SAE J2464 |
9.2.10. |
UL 1642 |
9.2.11. |
UL 1642 - Further information: Scope of the Test |
9.2.12. |
EUCAR and the Hazard Level |
9.2.13. |
Common safety verification |
10. |
SOLID-STATE BATTERY APPLICATIONS |
10.1. |
Potential applications for solid-state batteries |
10.2. |
Market readiness |
10.3. |
Market readiness 2 |
10.4. |
Market readiness 3 |
10.5. |
Solid-state batteries for consumer electronics |
10.6. |
Performance comparison: CEs & wearables |
10.7. |
Batteries used in electric vehicles: example |
10.8. |
Solid-state batteries for electric vehicles |
11. |
COMPANY PROFILES |
11.1. |
24M |
11.1.1. |
Company summary |
11.1.2. |
Performance summary of 24M |
11.1.3. |
24M's cell configuration |
11.1.4. |
History of 24M |
11.1.5. |
History of 24M (2) |
11.1.6. |
24M's technology |
11.1.7. |
Partnership history and target specifications |
11.1.8. |
Manufacturing comparison |
11.1.9. |
Streamlined production process vs. conventional solutions |
11.1.10. |
Time saving of 24M technology |
11.1.11. |
FREYR battery manufacturing development roadmap based on 24M's technology |
11.1.12. |
Processes of manufacturing semi-solid cells |
11.1.13. |
New platform enabled by 24M |
11.1.14. |
Redefining manufacturing process by 24M |
11.1.15. |
24M's semi-automated pilot manufacturing line |
11.1.16. |
Kyocera's commercial activities |
11.1.17. |
24M Dual Electrolyte System |
11.1.18. |
Dual Electrolyte System proof of concept |
11.1.19. |
Dual electrolyte enabling Li-metal: NMC622/SSE, 45 µm /lithium metal |
11.1.20. |
Lithium coated copper foil for pre-lithiation |
11.1.21. |
24M commercial partners and investors |
11.1.22. |
24M's business model and funding |
11.1.23. |
24M product roadmap |
11.1.24. |
FREYR's battery supply chain |
11.1.25. |
Value chain of Freyr by using 24M technology |
11.1.26. |
Emerging European battery supply chain facilitates full-cycle sustainability |
11.1.27. |
24M supply chain |
11.1.28. |
Carbon reduction analysis |
11.1.29. |
Battery cost breakdown by Freyr |
11.1.30. |
Patent descriptions of 24M |
11.1.31. |
SWOT analysis of 24M |
11.1.32. |
Technology analysis |
11.1.33. |
Technology analysis (2) |
11.1.34. |
Manufacturing and supply chain analysis |
11.1.35. |
Relationship and business analysis |
11.2. |
Ampcera |
11.2.1. |
Company introduction |
11.2.2. |
Ampcera's technology |
11.2.3. |
Solid-state composite |
11.2.4. |
Products |
11.2.5. |
Key customers and partners |
11.3. |
Blue Solutions / Bolloré |
11.3.1. |
Introduction to Blue Solutions |
11.3.2. |
Bolloré's LMF batteries |
11.3.3. |
Automakers' efforts - Bolloré |
11.3.4. |
Blue Solutions' technology development |
11.4. |
BrightVolt |
11.4.1. |
BrightVolt batteries |
11.4.2. |
BrightVolt electrolyte |
11.4.3. |
PME enabled simplified back-end assembly |
11.4.4. |
Battery testing data |
11.4.5. |
Cell scaling |
11.4.6. |
Manufacturing compatibility |
11.5. |
CATL |
11.5.1. |
Introduction |
11.5.2. |
CATL's energy density development roadmap |
11.5.3. |
CATL's patents on solid-state batteries |
11.6. |
CEA Tech |
11.7. |
Coslight |
11.8. |
Cymbet Corporation |
11.8.1. |
Introduction to Cymbet |
11.8.2. |
Technology |
11.8.3. |
Micro-battery products |
11.9. |
Enovate Motors |
11.10. |
Ensurge Micropower (Formerly Thin Film Electronics ASA ) |
11.10.1. |
Introduction to the company |
11.10.2. |
Ensurge's execution plan |
11.10.3. |
Ensurge's technology 1 |
11.10.4. |
Ensurge's technology 2 |
11.10.5. |
Anode-less design |
11.10.6. |
Business model and market |
11.10.7. |
Key customers, partners, and competitors |
11.10.8. |
Company financials |
11.11. |
Excellatron |
11.11.1. |
Introduction to Excellatron |
11.11.2. |
Thin-film solid-state batteries made by Excellatron |
11.12. |
Factorial Energy |
11.12.1. |
Company summary |
11.12.2. |
Performance summary of Factorial Energy |
11.12.3. |
Introduction to Factorial Energy |
11.12.4. |
Company history |
11.12.5. |
Factorial Energy's technology |
11.12.6. |
Cycle life tests |
11.12.7. |
Elevated and low temperature tests |
11.12.8. |
Power test |
11.12.9. |
Possible supply chain |
11.12.10. |
SWOT analysis of Factorial Energy |
11.12.11. |
Technology analysis |
11.12.12. |
Technology analysis 2 |
11.12.13. |
Business analysis |
11.13. |
FDK |
11.13.1. |
Introduction |
11.13.2. |
Applications of FDK's solid state battery |
11.13.3. |
FDK's SMD all-solid-state battery |
11.14. |
Fisker |
11.14.1. |
Automakers' efforts - Fisker Inc. |
11.15. |
Fraunhofer |
11.15.1. |
Academic views - Fraunhofer Batterien |
11.15.2. |
IKTS' sites working on ASSB |
11.15.3. |
IKTS' technology |
11.15.4. |
LLZO manufacturing processes |
11.15.5. |
IKTS' EMBATT development |
11.15.6. |
Work on LATP |
11.16. |
Front Edge Technology |
11.16.1. |
Ultra-thin micro-battery - NanoEnergy® (1) |
11.16.2. |
Ultra-thin micro-battery - NanoEnergy® (2) |
11.17. |
Ganfeng Lithium |
11.17.1. |
Company summary |
11.17.2. |
Performance summary of Ganfeng Lithium |
11.17.3. |
Cell structure summary |
11.17.4. |
Ganfeng Lithium's history (1) |
11.17.5. |
Ganfeng Lithium's history (2) |
11.17.6. |
Ganfeng Lithium's history (3) |
11.17.7. |
Dongfeng demonstration |
11.17.8. |
Ganfeng Lithium's SSB technology |
11.17.9. |
Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, CAS |
11.17.10. |
Pilot produced battery: energy density |
11.17.11. |
Pilot produced battery: rating capability |
11.17.12. |
Pilot produced battery: temperature performance |
11.17.13. |
Ganfeng's collaborative ecosystem |
11.17.14. |
Global layout |
11.17.15. |
Ganfeng's supply chain layout |
11.17.16. |
R&D laboratory |
11.17.17. |
Scientific research platform |
11.17.18. |
Undertaken projects |
11.17.19. |
Collaboration |
11.17.20. |
Lithium metal production |
11.17.21. |
Technology roadmap |
11.17.22. |
Solid-state battery products: Solid-state lithium-ion battery |
11.17.23. |
Solid-state battery products: Solid-State lithium metal cell |
11.17.24. |
Solid-state battery products: Solid-state lithium battery module |
11.17.25. |
Gangfeng Lithium's supply chain |
11.17.26. |
Funding and clients |
11.17.27. |
Financial details of 2020 |
11.17.28. |
Revenue by business lines |
11.17.29. |
Revenue by geography |
11.17.30. |
Revenue / profit over years |
11.17.31. |
SWOT analysis of Ganfeng Lithium |
11.17.32. |
Technology and manufacturing analysis |
11.17.33. |
Supply chain analysis |
11.17.34. |
Relationship and business analysis |
11.18. |
Hitachi Zosen |
11.18.1. |
Hitachi Zosen's solid-state electrolyte |
11.18.2. |
Hitachi Zosen's batteries |
11.18.3. |
Battery characteristics |
11.19. |
Hydro-Québec |
11.19.1. |
Hydro-Québec 1 |
11.19.2. |
Hydro-Québec 2 |
11.19.3. |
Battery development plan |
11.19.4. |
Partners |
11.20. |
Ilika |
11.20.1. |
Introduction to Ilika |
11.20.2. |
Ilika's microtechnology |
11.20.3. |
Technology roadmap and potential applications |
11.20.4. |
Ilika's business model |
11.20.5. |
Ilika's manufacturing model |
11.20.6. |
Ilika: Stereax |
11.20.7. |
Ilika: Goliath |
11.20.8. |
Goliath manufacturing |
11.21. |
Infinite Power Solutions |
11.21.1. |
Technology of Infinite Power Solutions |
11.21.2. |
Cost comparison between a standard prismatic battery and IPS' battery |
11.22. |
Ionic Materials |
11.22.1. |
Introduction |
11.22.2. |
Technology and manufacturing process of Ionic Materials |
11.23. |
Ion Storage Systems |
11.23.1. |
Introduction to Ion Storage Systems |
11.23.2. |
Cell technology |
11.23.3. |
Ion Storage System's scaling process |
11.23.4. |
Partners and expertise |
11.24. |
JiaWei Renewable Energy |
11.25. |
Johnson Energy Storage |
11.25.1. |
JES' technology |
11.26. |
Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, CAS |
11.27. |
Ohara Corporation |
11.27.1. |
Lithium ion conducting glass-ceramic powder-01 |
11.27.2. |
LICGCTM PW-01 for cathode additives |
11.27.3. |
Ohara's products for solid state batteries |
11.27.4. |
Ohara / PolyPlus |
11.27.5. |
Application of LICGC for all solid state batteries |
11.27.6. |
Properties of multilayer all solid-state lithium ion battery using LICGC as electrolyte |
11.27.7. |
LICGC products at the show |
11.27.8. |
Manufacturing process of Ohara glass |
11.28. |
PolyPlus |
11.28.1. |
Introduction to PolyPlus |
11.28.2. |
PLE separator |
11.28.3. |
PolyPlus projects |
11.28.4. |
PLE-based batteries |
11.28.5. |
Lithium seawater battery development plan |
11.28.6. |
PolyPlus Glass Battery |
11.28.7. |
Testing data |
11.28.8. |
Cell fabrication |
11.28.9. |
Hybrid Li-metal battery vs fully solid-state battery |
11.29. |
Prieto Battery |
11.30. |
Prime Planet Energy & Solutions |
11.30.1. |
Company introduction |
11.31. |
ProLogium |
11.31.1. |
Company summary |
11.31.2. |
Performance summary of ProLogium |
11.31.3. |
Cell structure summary |
11.31.4. |
Separator description |
11.31.5. |
Company history |
11.31.6. |
Funding |
11.31.7. |
Technology highlights |
11.31.8. |
Core technology: oxide electrolyte & ASM |
11.31.9. |
Core technology: LCB |
11.31.10. |
Core technology: MAB |
11.31.11. |
Product types |
11.31.12. |
Improvement of LCB electrical properties |
11.31.13. |
Improvement of LCB cells |
11.31.14. |
Cell operation temperature data |
11.31.15. |
MAB pack progress roadmap |
11.31.16. |
MAB idea to increase assembly utilization |
11.31.17. |
ProLogium assembly CTP and CIP |
11.31.18. |
Inlay structure for the MAB technology |
11.31.19. |
ProLogium: EV battery pack assembly |
11.31.20. |
ProLogium: "MAB" EV battery pack assembly |
11.31.21. |
Cost reduction potential |
11.31.22. |
ProLogium's manufacturing experience |
11.31.23. |
Global production plan |
11.31.24. |
Recycling |
11.31.25. |
Business model and markets |
11.31.26. |
Supply chain of ProLogium |
11.31.27. |
Patent summary |
11.31.28. |
Adoption case study: Enovate Motors |
11.31.29. |
SWOT analysis of ProLogium |
11.31.30. |
Cell technology strengths |
11.31.31. |
Cell technology weaknesses |
11.31.32. |
Pack technology analysis |
11.31.33. |
Manufacturing analysis |
11.31.34. |
Supply chain analysis |
11.31.35. |
Business analysis |
11.32. |
Qingtao Energy Development |
11.32.1. |
Company summary |
11.32.2. |
Performance summary of Qingtao |
11.32.3. |
Cell structure summary |
11.32.4. |
History of Qingtao Energy Development 1 |
11.32.5. |
History of Qingtao Energy Development 2 |
11.32.6. |
History of QingTao Energy Development 3 |
11.32.7. |
Mass specific energy test |
11.32.8. |
Qingtao business areas |
11.32.9. |
Yichun 1GWh facility equipment and capacity |
11.32.10. |
Manufacturing processes |
11.32.11. |
Yichun 1GWh facility: major materials |
11.32.12. |
Yichun 1GWh facility: major materials (continue) |
11.32.13. |
Cell manufacturing |
11.32.14. |
Qingtao battery pilot sample production facilities |
11.32.15. |
Qingtao material formation/process R&D platform 1 |
11.32.16. |
Qingtao material formation/process R&D platform 2 |
11.32.17. |
Qingtao 1GWh facility |
11.32.18. |
Qingtao's SSB products: Cells |
11.32.19. |
Qingtao's SSB products: Packs 1 |
11.32.20. |
Qingtao's SSB products: Packs 2 |
11.32.21. |
Qingtao's SSB products: Electronics |
11.32.22. |
Qingtao's SSB products: Energy storage systems |
11.32.23. |
Qingtao's SSB products: Materials |
11.32.24. |
Qingtao's solid-state battery supply chain |
11.32.25. |
Funding |
11.32.26. |
Board members |
11.32.27. |
Commercialization plan of Qingtao |
11.32.28. |
BAIC's prototype |
11.32.29. |
Hozon Automobile's prototype |
11.32.30. |
SWOT analysis of Qingtao |
11.32.31. |
Analysis factors |
11.32.32. |
Cell performance analysis |
11.32.33. |
Manufacturing and supply chain analysis |
11.32.34. |
Relationship and business analysis |
11.33. |
QuantumScape |
11.33.1. |
Company summary |
11.33.2. |
Performance summary of QuantumScape |
11.33.3. |
Cell structure summary |
11.33.4. |
Introduction to QuantumScape |
11.33.5. |
Introduction to QuantumScape's technology |
11.33.6. |
QuantumScape prototypes |
11.33.7. |
QuantumScape's technology |
11.33.8. |
Garnet electrolyte/catholyte |
11.33.9. |
Summary of test analysis of QuantumScape's cells |
11.33.10. |
Single layer battery cycle life test |
11.33.11. |
Low temperature life test |
11.33.12. |
4-layer battery cycle life test |
11.33.13. |
10-layer battery cycle life test |
11.33.14. |
Cycle life test for LFP batteries |
11.33.15. |
Fast charging test |
11.33.16. |
Dendrite resistance performance of the electrolyte |
11.33.17. |
Power profile tested by VW |
11.33.18. |
4C fast charging |
11.33.19. |
Low temperature test |
11.33.20. |
Thermal stability test |
11.33.21. |
Heath checks |
11.33.22. |
Cycle life test |
11.33.23. |
Cycle life test (continued) |
11.33.24. |
Cycle life test (continued) |
11.33.25. |
Summary of external cycle life test |
11.33.26. |
Summary of cycle life test |
11.33.27. |
Zero externally applied pressure cycle life |
11.33.28. |
QuantumScape patent summary 1 |
11.33.29. |
QuantumScape patent summary 2 |
11.33.30. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 1 |
11.33.31. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 2 |
11.33.32. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 3 |
11.33.33. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 4 |
11.33.34. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 5 |
11.33.35. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 6 |
11.33.36. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 7 |
11.33.37. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 8 |
11.33.38. |
QuantumScape patent analysis 9 |
11.33.39. |
QuantumScape's manufacturing timeline |
11.33.40. |
Key milestones |
11.33.41. |
Manufacturing |
11.33.42. |
Key members in QuantumScape |
11.33.43. |
Solid-state battery supply chain of QuantumScape |
11.33.44. |
Funding and investors |
11.33.45. |
SWOT analysis of QuantumScape |
11.33.46. |
Features of garnet electrolyte in SSBs |
11.33.47. |
Technology analysis: Strengths |
11.33.48. |
Technology analysis: Weaknesses |
11.33.49. |
Manufacturing and supply chain analysis |
11.33.50. |
Relationship and business analysis |
11.34. |
Schott |
11.35. |
SEEO |
11.36. |
SES |
11.36.1. |
Company summary |
11.36.2. |
Performance summary of SES |
11.36.3. |
Cell structure summary |
11.36.4. |
Company history 1 |
11.36.5. |
Company history 2 |
11.36.6. |
5 metrics of SES' technology |
11.36.7. |
SES technology |
11.36.8. |
Good lithium metal surface required |
11.36.9. |
SES' electrolyte |
11.36.10. |
SES electrolyte development roadmap for EV under C/3-C/3 |
11.36.11. |
SES electrolyte development |
11.36.12. |
SES technology to prevent dendrite growth |
11.36.13. |
SES technology to prevent dendrite growth (cont'd) |
11.36.14. |
AI powered BMS safety algorithm |
11.36.15. |
Cathode and cell assembly |
11.36.16. |
Cell test data: 3-4 layers cell cycle life |
11.36.17. |
Cell test data: 4Ah cell cycle life |
11.36.18. |
Cell test data: 4Ah cell c-rate capability |
11.36.19. |
Test data of Hermes cell |
11.36.20. |
Apollo cell |
11.36.21. |
Lithium metal foils |
11.36.22. |
SES' demonstrated cell performance |
11.36.23. |
Comparison of SES cell and old Li-metal cell, graphite-based Li-ion cell and Li-ion cell with silicon-graphite composite anode |
11.36.24. |
Comparison among conventional Li-ion, solid-state Li-metal and SES hybrid Li-metal cells |
11.36.25. |
SES' products |
11.36.26. |
SES's lithium metal cell data |
11.36.27. |
SES' view on the market |
11.36.28. |
SES patents |
11.36.29. |
Development of an OEM-ready battery |
11.36.30. |
Manufacturing facility plan |
11.36.31. |
SES roadmap |
11.36.32. |
Battery supply chain for SES |
11.36.33. |
The future of Li-metal / Li-ion supply chain |
11.36.34. |
Customers & partners & investors |
11.36.35. |
Partnership with GM, Hyundai, and Honda |
11.36.36. |
Funding and financials |
11.36.37. |
2021 merge transaction summary |
11.36.38. |
SES board members |
11.36.39. |
SWOT analysis of SES |
11.36.40. |
Cell technology strengths |
11.36.41. |
Cell technology weaknesses |
11.36.42. |
Manufacturing and supply chain analysis |
11.36.43. |
Relationship and business analysis |
11.37. |
Solid Power |
11.37.1. |
Company summary |
11.37.2. |
Cell specifications |
11.37.3. |
Solid Power cell configuration |
11.37.4. |
History 1 |
11.37.5. |
History 2 |
11.37.6. |
Breaking energy density limit of Li-ion batteries |
11.37.7. |
Solid Power's core technology |
11.37.8. |
Solid Power's focus in the value chain |
11.37.9. |
Company products |
11.37.10. |
Solid Power's sulphide solid-state electrolyte |
11.37.11. |
Solid Power test data |
11.37.12. |
Solid Power test data (cont'd) |
11.37.13. |
High-content silicon EV cell data |
11.37.14. |
High-content silicon EV cell data (cont'd) |
11.37.15. |
High-content silicon EV cell data (cont'd) |
11.37.16. |
0.2+ Ah pouch cell data (cont'd) |
11.37.17. |
Technologies on Solid Power product roadmap |
11.37.18. |
Solid Power's technology roadmap |
11.37.19. |
High-content silicon anode battery roadmap |
11.37.20. |
Lithium metal anode battery roadmap |
11.37.21. |
Product roadmap |
11.37.22. |
Solid Power's cell roadmap |
11.37.23. |
Prototype progress |
11.37.24. |
Solid Power showed their samples |
11.37.25. |
Commercialization roadmap |
11.37.26. |
Solid Power's business model |
11.37.27. |
Solid state battery supply chain of Solid Power |
11.37.28. |
Solid Power's ASSB technology & partner ecosystem |
11.37.29. |
Solid Power's flexible All-Solid-State Platform |
11.37.30. |
Solid Power cost estimate |
11.37.31. |
Defined path for cost reduction |
11.37.32. |
Fabrication of cathode and electrolyte |
11.37.33. |
Solid Power cell production |
11.37.34. |
Pilot production facility |
11.37.35. |
Management team |
11.37.36. |
Upcoming milestones |
11.37.37. |
Funding |
11.37.38. |
Key partners & investors |
11.37.39. |
Solid Power patents |
11.37.40. |
SWOT analysis of Solid Power |
11.37.41. |
Technology analysis: Strengths |
11.37.42. |
Technology analysis: Weaknesses |
11.37.43. |
Manufacturing and supply chain analysis |
11.37.44. |
Relationship and business analysis |
11.38. |
SOLiTHOR/Imec |
11.38.1. |
About imec |
11.38.2. |
Imec's electrolyte |
11.38.3. |
About SOLiTHOR |
11.38.4. |
SOLiTHOR's technology |
11.39. |
Solvay |
11.39.1. |
Solvay 1 |
11.39.2. |
Solvay 2 |
11.40. |
STMicroelectronics |
11.41. |
Taiyo Yuden |
11.41.1. |
Introduction |
11.41.2. |
Battery characteristics |
11.41.3. |
Pulse discharge performance |
11.41.4. |
Available products |
11.42. |
TDK |
11.42.1. |
Introduction |
11.42.2. |
CeraCharge's performance |
11.42.3. |
Main applications of CeraCharge |
11.43. |
Toshiba |
11.43.1. |
Introduction |
11.43.2. |
Composite solid-state electrolyte |
11.44. |
Toyota |
11.44.1. |
Toyota's activities |
11.44.2. |
Toyota's efforts |
11.44.3. |
Toyota's prototype |
11.45. |
WeLion New Energy Technology |
11.45.1. |
Company summary |
11.45.2. |
Performance summary of WeLion |
11.45.3. |
Cell configuration summary |
11.45.4. |
Company history |
11.45.5. |
NIO |
11.45.6. |
Progress of SSB research at IoP, CAS |
11.45.7. |
WeLion's battery development history |
11.45.8. |
Company presence |
11.45.9. |
Funding |
11.45.10. |
WeLion's core technologies 1 |
11.45.11. |
WeLion's core technologies 2 |
11.45.12. |
Core technology 1: Composite lithium anode: target rating and volume expansion issues |
11.45.13. |
Core technology 2: Ionic conducting film |
11.45.14. |
Core technology 3: In-situ solidification technology |
11.45.15. |
SEM images of the lithium metal and electrolyte |
11.45.16. |
Capacity / voltage performance of the battery |
11.45.17. |
Pre-lithiation |
11.45.18. |
WeLion products |
11.45.19. |
Products and application for EV |
11.45.20. |
Hybrid liquid-solid battery performance |
11.45.21. |
High energy density product performance |
11.45.22. |
Possible value chain for WeLion |
11.45.23. |
SWOT analysis of WeLion |
11.45.24. |
Technology analysis |
11.45.25. |
Supply chain, relationship and business analysis |
12. |
APPENDIX |
12.1. |
Appendix: Background |
12.1.1. |
Glossary of terms - specifications |
12.1.2. |
Useful charts for performance comparison |
12.1.3. |
Battery categories |
12.1.4. |
Comparison of commercial battery packaging technologies |
12.1.5. |
Actors along the value chain for energy storage |
12.1.6. |
Primary battery chemistries and common applications |
12.1.7. |
Numerical specifications of popular rechargeable battery chemistries |
12.1.8. |
Battery technology benchmark |
12.1.9. |
What does 1 kilowatthour (kWh) look like? |
12.1.10. |
A-D sample definitions |
12.1.11. |
Technology and manufacturing readiness |
12.2. |
Appendix: Li-Ion Batteries |
12.2.1. |
Food is electricity for humans |
12.2.2. |
What is a Li-ion battery (LIB)? |
12.2.3. |
Anode alternatives: Lithium titanium and lithium metal |
12.2.4. |
Anode alternatives: Other carbon materials |
12.2.5. |
Anode alternatives: Silicon, tin and alloying materials |
12.2.6. |
Cathode alternatives: LCO & LFP |
12.2.7. |
Cathode alternatives: NMC, NCA & LMO |
12.2.8. |
Cathode alternatives: LNMO and Vanadium pentoxide |
12.2.9. |
Cathode alternatives: Sulphur |
12.2.10. |
Cathode alternatives: Oxygen |
12.2.11. |
High energy cathodes require fluorinated electrolytes |
12.2.12. |
How can LIBs be improved? |
12.2.13. |
Milestone discoveries that shaped the modern lithium-ion batteries |
12.2.14. |
Push, pull and trilemma in Li-ions |
12.2.15. |
Lithium-ion supply chain |
12.2.16. |
High-end commercial Li-ion battery specifications |
12.2.17. |
Cathode performance comparison |
12.2.18. |
Comparison of Li-ion batteries for automotive |
12.2.19. |
Cell energy density comparison of different cathodes |
12.3. |
Appendix:Why Is Battery Development so Slow? |
12.3.1. |
What is a battery? |
12.3.2. |
A big obstacle — energy density |
12.3.3. |
Battery technology is based on redox reactions |
12.3.4. |
Electrochemical reaction is essentially based on electron transfer |
12.3.5. |
Electrochemical inactive components reduce energy density |
12.3.6. |
The importance of an electrolyte in a battery |
12.3.7. |
Cathode & anode need to have structural order |
12.3.8. |
Failure story about metallic lithium anode |
12.3.9. |
Appendix: Cathode and Cell Comparison for Conventional Lithium-Ion Batteries |
12.3.10. |
Cathode performance comparison |
12.3.11. |
Comparison of Li-ion batteries for automotive |
12.3.12. |
Cell energy density comparison of different cathodes |