Summary

Toxicology Testing Services Market – Scope of Report
TMR’s report on the global toxicology testing services market studies the past as well as the current growth trends and opportunities to gain valuable insights of the indicators of the market during the forecast period from 2023 to 2031. The report provides revenue of the global toxicology testing services market for the period 2017–2031, considering 2023 as the base year and 2031 as the forecast year. The report also provides the compound annual growth rate (CAGR %) of the global toxicology testing services market from 2023 to 2031.

The report has been prepared after an extensive research. Primary research involved bulk of the research efforts, wherein analysts carried out interviews with key opinion leaders, industry leaders, and opinion makers. Secondary research involved referring to key players’ product literature, annual reports, press releases, and relevant documents to understand the toxicology testing services market.

Secondary research also included Internet sources, statistical data from government agencies, websites, and trade associations. Analysts employed a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches to study various attributes of the global toxicology testing services market.

The report includes an elaborate executive summary, along with a snapshot of the growth behavior of various segments included in the scope of the study. Moreover, the report throws light on the changing competitive dynamics in the global toxicology testing services market. These serve as valuable tools for existing market players as well as for entities interested in participating in the global toxicology testing services market.

The report delves into the competitive landscape of the global toxicology testing services market. Key players operating in the global toxicology testing services market have been identified and each one of these has been profiled in terms of various attributes. Company overview, financial standings, recent developments, and SWOT are the attributes of players in the global toxicology testing services market profiled in this report.

Key Questions Answered in Global toxicology testing services Market Report
• What is the sales/revenue generated by toxicology testing services across all regions during the forecast period?
• What are the opportunities in the global toxicology testing services market?
• What are the major drivers, restraints, opportunities, and threats in the market?
• Which regional market is set to expand at the fastest CAGR during the forecast period?
• Which segment is expected to generate the highest revenue globally in 2031?
• Which segment is projected to expand at the highest CAGR during the forecast period?
• What are the market positions of different companies operating in the global market?

Toxicology Testing Services Market – Research Objectives and Research Approach
The comprehensive report on the global toxicology testing services market begins with an overview, followed by the scope and objectives of the study. The report provides detailed explanation of the objectives behind this study and key vendors and distributors operating in the market and regulatory scenario for approval of products.

For reading comprehensibility, the report has been compiled in a chapter-wise layout, with each section divided into smaller ones. The report comprises an exhaustive collection of graphs and tables that are appropriately interspersed. Pictorial representation of actual and projected values of key segments is visually appealing to readers. This also allows comparison of the market shares of key segments in the past and at the end of the forecast period.

The report analyzes the global toxicology testing services market in terms of product, end-user, and region. Key segments under each criterion have been studied at length, and the market share for each of these at the end of 2031 has been provided. Such valuable insights enable market stakeholders in making informed business decisions for investment in the global toxicology testing services market.

ページTOPに戻る

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary
1.1. Market Definition and Scope
1.2. Market Segmentation
1.3. Key Research Objectives
1.4. Research Highlights
2. Assumptions and Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary: Global Toxicology Testing Services Market
4. Market Overview
4.1. Market Segmentation
4.1.1. Segment Definition
4.1.2. Industry Evolution / Developments
4.2. Overview
4.3. Market Dynamics
4.3.1. Drivers
4.3.2. Restraints
4.3.3. Opportunities
4.4. Global Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast, 2022–2031
5. Key Insights
5.1. Pipeline Analysis
5.2. List of Types of Toxicology Testing Services Tests
5.3. Disease Prevalence & Incidence Rate Globally with Key Countries
5.4. COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Industry
6. Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast, by Method
6.1. Introduction and Definitions
6.2. Key Findings/Developments
6.3. Market Value Forecast, by Method, 2017–2031
6.3.1. In Vivo Method
6.3.2. In Vitro Method
6.3.3. In Silico Method
6.4. Market Attractiveness, by Method
7. Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast, by Type of Industry
7.1. Introduction and Definitions
7.2. Key Findings/Developments
7.3. Market Value Forecast, by Type of Industry, 2017–2031
7.3.1. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology
7.3.2. Cosmetic
7.3.3. Chemical
7.3.4. Medical Devices
7.3.5. Others (Food, Agricultural, and Environmental)
7.4. Market Attractiveness, by Type of Industry
8. Global Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast, by Region
8.1. Key Findings
8.2. Market Value Forecast, by Region, 2017–2031
8.2.1. North America
8.2.2. Europe
8.2.3. Asia Pacific
8.2.4. Latin America
8.2.5. Middle East & Africa
8.3. Market Attractiveness, by Region
9. North America Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast
9.1. Introduction
9.1.1. Key Findings
9.2. Market Value Forecast, by Method, 2017–2031
9.2.1. In Vivo Method
9.2.2. In Vitro Method
9.2.3. In Silico Method
9.3. Market Attractiveness, by Method
9.4. Market Value Forecast, by Type of Industry, 2017–2031
9.4.1. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology
9.4.2. Cosmetic
9.4.3. Chemical
9.4.4. Medical Devices
9.4.5. Others (Food, Agricultural, and Environmental)
9.5. Market Attractiveness, by Type of Industry
9.6. Market Value Forecast, by Country, 2022–2031
9.6.1. U.S.
9.6.2. Canada
9.7. Market Attractiveness Analysis
9.7.1. By Method
9.7.2. By Type of Industry
9.7.3. By Country
10. Europe Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast
10.1. Introduction
10.1.1. Key Findings
10.2. Market Value Forecast, by Method, 2017–2031
10.2.1. In Vivo Method
10.2.2. In Vitro Method
10.2.3. In Silico Method
10.3. Market Attractiveness, by Method
10.4. Market Value Forecast, by Type of Industry, 2017–2031
10.4.1. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology
10.4.2. Cosmetic
10.4.3. Chemical
10.4.4. Medical Devices
10.4.5. Others (Food, Agricultural, and Environmental)
10.5. Market Attractiveness, by Type of Industry
10.6. Market Value Forecast, by Country/Sub-region, 2022–2031
10.6.1. Germany
10.6.2. U.K.
10.6.3. France
10.6.4. Italy
10.6.5. Spain
10.6.6. Rest of Europe
10.7. Market Attractiveness Analysis
10.7.1. By Method
10.7.2. By Type of Industry
10.7.3. By Country/Sub-region
11. Asia Pacific Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast
11.1. Introduction
11.1.1. Key Findings
11.2. Market Value Forecast, by Method, 2017–2031
11.2.1. In Vivo Method
11.2.2. In Vitro Method
11.2.3. In Silico Method
11.3. Market Attractiveness, by Method
11.4. Market Value Forecast, by Type of Industry, 2017–2031
11.4.1. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology
11.4.2. Cosmetic
11.4.3. Chemical
11.4.4. Medical Devices
11.4.5. Others (Food, Agricultural, and Environmental)
11.5. Market Attractiveness, by Type of Industry
11.6. Market Value Forecast, by Country/Sub-region, 2017–2031
11.6.1. China
11.6.2. Japan
11.6.3. India
11.6.4. Australia & New Zealand
11.6.5. Rest of Asia Pacific
11.7. Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.7.1. By Method
11.7.1.1. By Type of Industry
11.7.1.2. By Country/Sub-region
12. Latin America Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast
12.1. Introduction
12.1.1. Key Findings
12.2. Market Value Forecast, by Method, 2017–2031
12.2.1. In Vivo Method
12.2.2. In Vitro Method
12.2.3. In Silico Method
12.3. Market Attractiveness, by Method
12.4. Market Value Forecast, by Type of Industry, 2017–2031
12.4.1. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology
12.4.2. Cosmetic
12.4.3. Chemical
12.4.4. Medical Devices
12.4.5. Others (Food, Agricultural, and Environmental)
12.5. Market Attractiveness, by Type of Industry
12.6. Market Value Forecast, by Country/Sub-region, 2017–2031
12.6.1. Brazil
12.6.2. Mexico
12.6.3. Rest of Latin America
12.7. Market Attractiveness Analysis
12.7.1. By Method
12.7.1.1. By Type of Industry
12.7.1.2. By Country/Sub-region
13. Middle East & Africa Toxicology Testing Services Market Analysis and Forecast
13.1. Introduction
13.1.1. Key Findings
13.2. Market Value Forecast, by Method, 2017–2031
13.2.1. In Vivo Method
13.2.2. In Vitro Method
13.2.3. In Silico Method
13.3. Market Attractiveness, by Method
13.4. Market Value Forecast, by Type of Industry, 2017–2031
13.4.1. Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology
13.4.2. Cosmetic
13.4.3. Chemical
13.4.4. Medical Devices
13.4.5. Others (Food, Agricultural, and Environmental)
13.5. Market Attractiveness, by Type of Industry
13.6. Market Value Forecast, by Country/Sub-region, 2017–2031
13.6.1. GCC Countries
13.6.2. South Africa
13.6.3. Rest of Middle East & Africa
13.7. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.7.1. By Method
13.7.2. By Type of Industry
13.7.3. By Country/Sub-region
14. Competition Landscape
14.1. Market Player – Competition Matrix (By Tier and Size of Companies)
14.2. Market Share Analysis, by Company (2022)
14.3. Company Profiles
14.3.1. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
14.3.1.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.1.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.1.3. Financial Overview
14.3.1.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.1.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.2. Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
14.3.2.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.2.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.2.3. Financial Overview
14.3.2.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.2.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.3. Eurofins Scientific
14.3.3.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.3.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.3.3. Financial Overview
14.3.3.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.3.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.4. Bureau Veritas
14.3.4.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.4.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.4.3. Financial Overview
14.3.4.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.4.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.5. Envigo
14.3.5.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.5.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.5.3. Financial Overview
14.3.5.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.5.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.6. Evotec AG
14.3.6.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.6.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.6.3. Financial Overview
14.3.6.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.6.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.7. Merck KGaA
14.3.7.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.7.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.7.3. Financial Overview
14.3.7.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.7.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.8. SGS Group
14.3.8.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.8.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.8.3. Financial Overview
14.3.8.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.8.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.9. Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC
14.3.9.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.9.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.9.3. Financial Overview
14.3.9.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.9.5. Strategic Overview
14.3.10. Wuxi AppTec
14.3.10.1. Company Overview (HQ, Business Segments, Employee Strength)
14.3.10.2. Method Portfolio
14.3.10.3. Financial Overview
14.3.10.4. SWOT Analysis
14.3.10.5. Strategic Overview