1. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. |
5G, next generation cellular communications network |
1.2. |
Two types of 5G: Sub-6 GHz and mmWave |
1.3. |
Summary: Global trends and new opportunities in 5G/6G |
1.4. |
Updates on mmWave 5G deployment by region |
1.5. |
Updates on mmWave 5G deployment by region |
1.6. |
New opportunities for low-loss materials in mmWave 5G |
1.7. |
Low-loss materials for 5G/6G discussed in this report |
1.8. |
Applications of low-loss materials in semiconductor and electronics packaging |
1.9. |
Evolution of low-loss materials used in different applications |
1.10. |
Evolution of organic PCB materials for 5G |
1.11. |
Benchmark of commercial low-loss organic laminates @ 10 GHz |
1.12. |
Benchmark of LTCC and glass materials |
1.13. |
Benchmarking of commercial low-loss materials for 5G PCBs/components |
1.14. |
Status and outlook of commercial low-loss materials for 5G PCBs/components |
1.15. |
Key low-loss materials supplier landscape |
1.16. |
Packaging trends for 5G and 6G connectivity |
1.17. |
Packaging trends for 5G and 6G connectivity |
1.18. |
Benchmark of low loss materials for AiP |
1.19. |
Overview: Redistribution layers in advanced semiconductor packages for 5G smartphones |
1.20. |
IDTechEx outlook of low-loss materials for 6G |
1.21. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G: Area and revenue |
1.22. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G segmented by frequency |
1.23. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G segmented by material type: Revenue and area |
1.24. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G base stations |
1.25. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G |
1.26. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G smartphone antennas |
1.27. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G CPEs |
1.28. |
Conclusions |
2. |
INTRODUCTION |
2.1. |
Terms and definitions |
2.1.1. |
IDTechEx definitions of "substrate" |
2.1.2. |
IDTechEx definitions of "package" |
2.1.3. |
Glossary of abbreviations |
2.2. |
Introduction to 5G |
2.2.1. |
Evolution of mobile communications |
2.2.2. |
5G commercial/pre-commercial services (2022) |
2.2.3. |
5G, next generation cellular communications network |
2.2.4. |
5G standardization roadmap |
2.2.5. |
Two types of 5G: Sub-6 GHz and mmWave |
2.2.6. |
5G network deployment strategy |
2.2.7. |
Low, mid-band 5G is often the operator's first choice to provide 5G national coverage |
2.2.8. |
Approaches to overcome the challenges of 5G limited coverage |
2.2.9. |
5G Commercial/Pre-commercial Services by Frequency |
2.2.10. |
5G mmWave commercial/pre-commercial services (Sep. 2022) |
2.2.11. |
Mobile private networks landscape - By frequency |
2.2.12. |
Updates on mmWave 5G deployment by region |
2.2.13. |
Updates on mmWave 5G deployment by region |
2.2.14. |
The main technique innovations in 5G |
2.2.15. |
5G for mobile consumers market overview |
2.2.16. |
5G for industries overview |
2.2.17. |
5G supply chain overview |
2.2.18. |
5G user equipment player landscape |
2.2.19. |
5G for home: Fixed wireless access (FWA) |
2.2.20. |
5G Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) |
2.2.21. |
Summary: Global trends and new opportunities in 5G |
2.3. |
Introduction to low-loss materials for 5G |
2.3.1. |
Overview of challenges, trends, and innovations for high frequency 5G devices |
2.3.2. |
New opportunities for low-loss materials in mmWave 5G |
2.3.3. |
Applications of low-loss materials in semiconductor and electronics packaging |
2.3.4. |
Anatomy of a copper clad laminate |
2.3.5. |
Applications of low-loss materials: Beamforming system in 5G base station |
2.3.6. |
Applications of low-loss materials: PCBs in 5G CPEs |
2.3.7. |
Applications for low-loss materials: mmWave 5G antenna module for smartphones |
2.3.8. |
Applications for low-loss materials: Semiconductor packages |
2.3.9. |
Roadmap of Df/Dk development across all packaging materials for mmWave 5G |
3. |
LOW-LOSS MATERIALS AT THE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD (PCB) AND COMPONENT LEVEL |
3.1. |
Introduction |
3.1.1. |
Overview of low-loss materials for PCBs and semiconductor packages |
3.1.2. |
Five important metrics impacting low-loss materials selection |
3.2. |
Low-loss organic laminate overview |
3.2.1. |
Electric properties of common polymers |
3.2.2. |
Thermoplastics vs thermosets |
3.2.3. |
Thermoplastics vs thermosets for 5G |
3.2.4. |
Evolution of organic PCB materials for 5G |
3.2.5. |
Innovation trends for organic high frequency laminate materials |
3.2.6. |
Hybrid system: Cost reduction for high frequency circuit boards |
3.2.7. |
Key suppliers for high frequency and high-speed copper clad laminate |
3.2.8. |
Benchmark of commercialised low-loss organic laminates |
3.2.9. |
Benchmark of commercial low-loss organic laminates @ 10 GHz |
3.2.10. |
Other examples of low-loss laminates |
3.3. |
Low-loss thermosets |
3.3.1. |
Strategies to achieve lower dielectric loss and trade-offs |
3.3.2. |
Factors affecting dielectric loss: Polarizability and molar volume |
3.3.3. |
Factors affecting dielectric loss: curing temperature |
3.3.4. |
Strategies to reduce Dk and Df: Low polarity functional groups or atomic bonds |
3.3.5. |
Strategies to reduce Dk and Df: Additives |
3.3.6. |
Strategies to reduce Dk: Bulky structures |
3.3.7. |
Strategies to reduce Dk: Porous structures |
3.3.8. |
Strategies to reduce Df: Rigid structures |
3.3.9. |
Where is the limit of Dk for modified thermosets? |
3.3.10. |
The influence of Dk and substrate choice on PCB feature size |
3.3.11. |
The challenge of thinning the PCB-substrate for high frequency applications |
3.3.12. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: Ajinomoto Group's Ajinomoto Build Up Film (ABF) |
3.3.13. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: Taiyo Ink's epoxy-based build-up materials |
3.3.14. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: Taiyo Ink's epoxy-based build-up materials |
3.3.15. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: DuPont's Pyralux laminates |
3.3.16. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: Laird's ECCOSTOCK |
3.3.17. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: Panasonic's R5410 |
3.3.18. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: JSR Corp's aromatic polyether (HC polymer) |
3.3.19. |
Low-loss thermoset suppliers: Showa Denko's polycyclic thermoset |
3.3.20. |
Low-loss thermoset laminate suppliers: Mitsubishi Gas Chemical's BT laminate |
3.3.21. |
Low-loss thermoset laminate suppliers: Isola |
3.3.22. |
Low-loss thermoset laminate suppliers: Isola |
3.4. |
Low-loss thermoplastics: Liquid crystal polymers |
3.4.1. |
Liquid crystal polymers (LCP) |
3.4.2. |
LCP classification |
3.4.3. |
LCP antennas in smartphones and FPCBs |
3.4.4. |
Liquid crystal polymer supply chain |
3.4.5. |
Liquid crystal polymer supply chain for printed circuit boards: Companies |
3.4.6. |
LCP types and key suppliers |
3.4.7. |
LCP as an alternative to PI for flexible printed circuit boards |
3.4.8. |
LCP vs PI: Dk and Df |
3.4.9. |
LCP vs PI: Moisture |
3.4.10. |
LCP vs PI: Flexibility |
3.4.11. |
LCP vs MPI: Cost |
3.4.12. |
LCP vs MPI: FCCL signal loss |
3.4.13. |
Commercial LCP and LCP-FCCL products |
3.4.14. |
Next-generation materials for smartphone antennas |
3.4.15. |
Evolution of smartphone antennas from 2G to mmWave 5G |
3.4.16. |
LCP product suppliers: Murata's MetroCirc antennas for smartphones |
3.4.17. |
LCP product suppliers: Career Technology |
3.4.18. |
LCP product suppliers: Avary/ZDT |
3.4.19. |
LCP product suppliers: KGK (Kyodo Giken Kagaku) |
3.4.20. |
LCP product suppliers: SYTECH's LCP-FCCL for mmWave 5G applications |
3.4.21. |
LCP product suppliers: iQLP |
3.4.22. |
LCP product suppliers: IQLP and DuPont's LCP-PCB |
3.5. |
Thermoplastic polymer: PTFE |
3.5.1. |
An introduction to fluoropolymers and PTFE |
3.5.2. |
Key properties of PTFE to consider for 5G applications |
3.5.3. |
Effect of crystallinity on the dielectric properties of PTFE-based laminates |
3.5.4. |
Key applications of PTFE in 5G |
3.5.5. |
Hybrid couplers using PTFE as a substrate |
3.5.6. |
Ceramic-filled vs glass-filled PTFE laminates |
3.5.7. |
Concerns of using PTFE-based laminates for high frequency 5G |
3.5.8. |
PTFE laminate suppliers: Rogers' Advanced Connectivity Solutions |
3.5.9. |
PTFE laminate suppliers: Rogers' ceramic-filled PTFE laminates |
3.5.10. |
PTFE laminate suppliers: Taconic |
3.5.11. |
PTFE laminate suppliers: SYTECH |
3.6. |
Sustainability in low-loss materials: PTFE |
3.6.1. |
Introduction to PFAS |
3.6.2. |
Concerns with PFAS |
3.6.3. |
Regulatory outlook for PFAS: EU |
3.6.4. |
Regulatory outlook for PFAS: USA |
3.6.5. |
Dutch court ruling on environmental damage caused by PFAS materials |
3.6.6. |
Regulations on PFAS as relevant to low-loss materials |
3.7. |
Other organic materials |
3.7.1. |
Poly(p-phenylene oxide) (PPO): Sabic |
3.7.2. |
Poly(p-phenylene ether) (PPE): Panasonic's MEGTRON |
3.7.3. |
Modified poly(p-phenylene ether) (mPPE): Asahi Kasei's XYRON |
3.7.4. |
Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS): Solvay's materials for base station antennas |
3.7.5. |
Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS): Toray's transparent, heat-resistant film |
3.7.6. |
Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT): Toray |
3.7.7. |
Hydrocarbon-based laminates |
3.7.8. |
Polymer aerogels as antenna substrates |
3.7.9. |
Aerogel suppliers: Blueshift's AeroZero for polyimide aerogel laminates |
3.7.10. |
Wood-derived cellulose nanofibril |
3.7.11. |
Polycarbonate (PC): Covestro's materials for injection-molded enclosures and covers |
3.8. |
Inorganic materials |
3.9. |
Ceramics/low-temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) |
3.9.1. |
5G application areas for ceramics/LTCC |
3.9.2. |
Introduction to ceramic materials |
3.9.3. |
The evolution from HTCC to LTCC |
3.9.4. |
Benchmark of LTCC materials |
3.9.5. |
Dielectric constant: Stability vs frequency for different inorganic substrates (LTCC, glass) |
3.9.6. |
Temperature stability of dielectric parameters of HTCC and LTCC alumina |
3.9.7. |
LTCC suppliers: Ferro |
3.9.8. |
LTCC suppliers: DuPont |
3.9.9. |
LTCC and HTCC-based substrates |
3.9.10. |
HTCC metal-ceramic packages |
3.9.11. |
LTCC substrate for RF transitions |
3.9.12. |
Production challenges of multilayer LTCC package |
3.9.13. |
LTCC suppliers: Kyocera's LTCC-based packages |
3.9.14. |
LTCC suppliers: Kyocera's LTCC-based packages |
3.9.15. |
LTCC suppliers: Kyocera's LTCC-based products and development projects |
3.9.16. |
Need for filter technologies beyond SAW/BAW |
3.9.17. |
Filter technologies compatible with mmWave 5G |
3.9.18. |
Benchmark of selected filter technologies for mmWave 5G applications |
3.9.19. |
Materials for transmission-line filters |
3.9.20. |
Role of LTCC and glass for future RF filter substrates |
3.9.21. |
LTCC suppliers: NGK's multi-layer LTCC filters |
3.9.22. |
LTCC suppliers: Minicircuits' multilayer LTCC filter |
3.9.23. |
LTCC suppliers: Sunway communication's phased array antenna for mmWave 5G phones |
3.9.24. |
LTCC suppliers: Tecdia's thin film and ceramic capacitors |
3.10. |
Glass |
3.10.1. |
Glass substrate |
3.10.2. |
Benchmark of various glass substrates |
3.10.3. |
Glass suppliers: JSK's HF-F for low transmission loss laminates |
3.10.4. |
Glass suppliers: SCHOTT's FLEXINITY connect |
3.10.5. |
Glass suppliers: AGC/ALCAN System's transparent antennas for windows |
3.10.6. |
Glass as a filter substrate |
3.10.7. |
Glass integrated passive devices (IPD) filter for 5G by Advanced Semiconductor Engineering |
3.10.8. |
Summary of low-loss materials for PCBs and RF components |
3.10.9. |
Benchmarking of commercial low-loss materials for 5G PCBs/components |
3.10.10. |
Status and outlook of commercial low-loss materials for 5G PCBs/components |
3.10.11. |
Property overview of low-loss materials |
3.10.12. |
Options for mmWave filter substrates |
4. |
LOW-LOSS MATERIALS AT THE PACKAGE-LEVEL |
4.1. |
Overview of electronic and semiconductor packaging |
4.1.1. |
Overview of general electronic packaging |
4.1.2. |
Overview of advanced semiconductor packaging |
4.1.3. |
From 1D to 3D semiconductor packaging |
4.1.4. |
Overview of semiconductor packaging technologies |
4.1.5. |
Packaging trends for 5G and 6G connectivity |
4.2. |
System in package (SiP) |
4.2.1. |
Heterogeneous integration solutions |
4.2.2. |
Overview of System on Chip (SOC) |
4.2.3. |
Overview of Multi-Chip Module (MCM) |
4.2.4. |
System in Package (SiP) |
4.2.5. |
Analysis of System in Package (SiP) |
4.2.6. |
Trend of increasing SiP content in electronics |
4.3. |
Towards AiP (antenna in package) |
4.3.1. |
High frequency integration and packaging trend |
4.3.2. |
Qualcomm: Antenna in package design (antenna on a substrate with flip chipped ICs) |
4.3.3. |
Evolution of Qualcomm mmWave AiP |
4.3.4. |
High frequency integration and packaging: Requirements and challenges |
4.3.5. |
Three methods for mmWave antenna integration |
4.3.6. |
Benchmarking of antenna packaging technologies |
4.3.7. |
AiP development trend |
4.3.8. |
Two types of AiP structures |
4.3.9. |
Two types of IC-embedded technology |
4.3.10. |
Two types of IC-embedded technology |
4.3.11. |
Key market players for IC-embedded technology by technology type |
4.3.12. |
Low loss materials: Key for 5G mmWave AiP |
4.3.13. |
Choices of low-loss materials for 5G mmWave AiP |
4.3.14. |
Benchmark of low loss materials for AiP |
4.3.15. |
Organic materials: the mainstream choice for substrates in AiP |
4.3.16. |
LTCC AiP for 5G: TDK |
4.3.17. |
Glass substrate AiP for 5G: Georgia Tech |
4.3.18. |
Summary of AiP for 5G |
4.4. |
Epoxy molded compounds (EMC) and mold under fill (MUF) |
4.4.1. |
What are EMC and MUFs? |
4.4.2. |
Epoxy Molding Compound (EMC) |
4.4.3. |
Key parameters for EMC materials |
4.4.4. |
Importance of dielectric constant for EMC used in 5G applications |
4.4.5. |
Experimental and commercial EMC products with low dielectric constant |
4.4.6. |
Epoxy resin: Parameters of different resins and hardener systems |
4.4.7. |
Fillers for EMC |
4.4.8. |
EMC for warpage management |
4.4.9. |
Supply chain for EMC materials |
4.4.10. |
EMC innovation trends for 5G applications |
4.4.11. |
High warpage control EMC for FO-WLP |
4.4.12. |
Possible solutions for warpage and die shift |
4.4.13. |
EMC suppliers: Sumitomo Bakelite |
4.4.14. |
EMC suppliers: Sumitomo Bakelite |
4.4.15. |
EMC suppliers: Kyocera's EMCs for semiconductors |
4.4.16. |
EMC suppliers: Samsung SDI |
4.4.17. |
EMC suppliers: Showa Denko |
4.4.18. |
EMC suppliers: Showa Denko's sulfur-free EMC |
4.4.19. |
EMC suppliers: KCC Corporation |
4.4.20. |
Molded underfill (MUF) |
4.4.21. |
MUF critical for flip clip molding technology |
4.4.22. |
Liquid molding compound (LMC) for compression molding |
4.5. |
Ink-based EMI shielding |
4.5.1. |
What is electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding? |
4.5.2. |
Package shielding involves compartmental and conformal shielding |
4.5.3. |
What materials are used for EMI shielding? |
4.5.4. |
Impact of changes in semiconductor package design |
4.5.5. |
Key trends for EMI shielding implementation |
4.5.6. |
Comparison of sputtering and spraying |
4.5.7. |
Process flow for competing printing methods |
4.5.8. |
Supplier details confirm that sputtering is the dominant approach |
4.5.9. |
Value chain for conformal package-level shielding |
4.5.10. |
Sputtering for package-level EMI shielding |
4.5.11. |
Conclusions: Spraying/printing for package-level EMI shielding |
4.5.12. |
Other deposition methods for package-level EMI shielding |
4.5.13. |
Early commercial example of package-level shielding |
4.5.14. |
Conformal package-level EMI shielding accompanied by compartmentalization |
4.5.15. |
Smartphone deployment example: Conformal shielding in Apple iPhone 12 |
4.5.16. |
Suppliers targeting ink-based conformal EMI shielding |
4.5.17. |
Ink-based EMI shielding suppliers: Henkel |
4.5.18. |
Ink-based EMI shielding suppliers: Duksan |
4.5.19. |
Ink-based EMI shielding suppliers: Ntrium |
4.5.20. |
Ink-based EMI shielding suppliers: Clariant |
4.5.21. |
Ink-based EMI shielding suppliers: Fujikura Kasei |
4.5.22. |
Spray machines used in conformal EMI shielding |
4.5.23. |
Particle size and morphology influence EMI shielding |
4.5.24. |
EMI shielding with particle-free inks |
4.5.25. |
Heraeus' inkjet printed particle-free Ag inks |
4.5.26. |
Key trend for EMI shielding: Compartmentalization of complex packages |
4.5.27. |
The challenge of magnetic shielding at low frequencies (I) |
4.5.28. |
The challenge of magnetic shielding at low frequencies (II) |
5. |
LOW-LOSS MATERIALS AT THE WAFER-LEVEL |
5.1. |
Redistribution layer (RDL) |
5.2. |
Redistribution layer (RDL) vs silicon |
5.3. |
Importance of low-loss RDL materials for different packaging technologies |
5.4. |
Low-loss RDL materials for mmWave: TSMC's InFO AiP |
5.5. |
Polymer dielectric materials for RDL |
5.6. |
Key parameters for organic RDL materials for next generation 2.5D fan-out packaging |
5.7. |
Benchmark of organic dielectrics for RDL |
5.8. |
RDL-dielectric suppliers: Toray's polyimide materials |
5.9. |
RDL-dielectric suppliers: DuPont's Arylalkyl polymers |
5.10. |
RDL-dielectric suppliers: DuPont's InterVia |
5.11. |
RDL-dielectric suppliers: HD Microsystems |
5.12. |
RDL-dielectric suppliers: Taiyo Ink's epoxy-based high-density RDL |
5.13. |
RDL-dielectric suppliers: Ajinomoto's nanofiller ABF |
5.14. |
RDL-dielectric supplier: Showa Denko |
5.15. |
Market for low-loss RDLs - Advanced semiconductor packages for 5G smartphones |
5.16. |
Overview: Redistribution layers in advanced semiconductor packages for 5G smartphones |
6. |
LOW-LOSS MATERIALS FOR 6G |
6.1. |
Overview |
6.1.1. |
Evolution of mobile communications |
6.1.2. |
5G/6G development and standardization roadmap |
6.1.3. |
IDTechEx outlook for 6G |
6.1.4. |
6G spectrum - Which bands are considered? |
6.1.5. |
Spectrum outlook from 2G to 6G |
6.1.6. |
Overview of potential 6G services |
6.1.7. |
6G - An overview of key applications |
6.1.8. |
Overview of land-mobile service applications in the frequency range 275-450 GHz |
6.1.9. |
Summary: Global trends and new opportunities in 6G |
6.1.10. |
Technical innovation comparison between 5G and 6G |
6.1.11. |
IDTechEx outlook of low-loss materials for 6G |
6.1.12. |
Research approaches for 6G low-loss materials by material category |
6.1.13. |
RDL materials for 6G |
6.1.14. |
Polyimide films for 6G |
6.1.15. |
Thermoplastics for 6G: Georgia Tech |
6.1.16. |
PTFE for 6G: Yonsei University, GIST |
6.1.17. |
PPS for 6G: Sichuan University |
6.1.18. |
Thermosets for 6G: ITEQ Corporation, INAOE |
6.1.19. |
PPE for 6G: Taiyo Ink, Georgia Institute of Technology |
6.1.20. |
Silicate materials for 6G: University of Oulu, University of Szeged |
6.1.21. |
Silicate materials for 6G: Aalborg University, Penn State |
6.1.22. |
Silicate materials for 6G: Tokyo Institute of Technology, AGC |
6.1.23. |
Glass for 6G: Georgia Tech |
6.1.24. |
Glass interposers for 6G |
6.1.25. |
LTCC for 6G: Fraunhofer IKTS |
6.1.26. |
Ceramics for 6G: overview |
6.1.27. |
Alumina fillers for 6G: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology |
6.1.28. |
Sustainable materials for 6G: University of Oulu |
6.1.29. |
Metal interposers for 6G: Cubic-Nuvotronics |
6.1.30. |
Roadmap for development of low-loss materials for 6G |
6.1.31. |
Roadmap for development of low-loss materials for 6G |
6.1.32. |
Standards for low-loss materials for 6G |
6.2. |
Radio-frequency metamaterials for 6G |
6.2.1. |
What is a metamaterial? |
6.2.2. |
Segmenting the metamaterial landscape |
6.2.3. |
Metamaterials for 6G: Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) |
6.2.4. |
Key drivers for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in telecommunications |
6.2.5. |
The current status of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) |
6.2.6. |
Key takeaways for RIS |
6.2.7. |
Materials selection for RF metamaterials: Introduction |
6.2.8. |
Operational frequency ranges by application |
6.2.9. |
Comparing relevant substrate materials at low frequencies |
6.2.10. |
Comparing relevant substrate materials at high frequencies |
6.2.11. |
Identifying suitable materials for active RF metamaterials near THz |
6.2.12. |
PP and PTFE show better performance than PET |
6.2.13. |
RIS for 5G/6G: Suitable RF metamaterials |
6.2.14. |
Metamaterials in RIS for 5G/6G: SWOT |
7. |
FORECASTS |
7.1. |
Forecast methodology and scope |
7.2. |
Low-loss material forecasts for 5G |
7.2.1. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G: Area and revenue |
7.2.2. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G segmented by material type: Revenue and area |
7.2.3. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G segmented by frequency |
7.2.4. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G |
7.3. |
Low-loss material forecasts for 5G infrastructure |
7.3.1. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G base stations segmented by frequency |
7.3.2. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G base stations segmented by material |
7.3.3. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G base stations |
7.3.4. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G base stations segmented by components |
7.4. |
Low-loss material forecasts for 5G smartphones |
7.4.1. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G smartphone antennas segmented by frequency |
7.4.2. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G smartphone antennas segmented by material |
7.4.3. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G smartphone antennas |
7.5. |
Low-loss material forecasts for 5G customer premises equipment (CPEs) |
7.5.1. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G CPEs segmented by frequency: Area and revenue |
7.5.2. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G CPEs segmented by material: Area and revenue |
7.5.3. |
Market discussion: Low-loss materials for 5G CPEs |
8. |
CONCLUSION |
8.1. |
Conclusions |
9. |
COMPANY PROFILES |
10. |
APPENDIX |
10.1. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G base stations segmented by material and component |
10.2. |
Forecast for low-loss materials for 5G - Segmented by frequency and application |
10.3. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G smartphones segmented by material |
10.4. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G CPEs segmented by material |
10.5. |
Forecast of low-loss materials for 5G segmented by material |