世界各国のリアルタイムなデータ・インテリジェンスで皆様をお手伝い

3D Electronics 2020-2030: Technologies, Forecasts, Players


3Dエレクトロニクス 2020-2030年:技術、予測、企業:PCB三次元成形回路部品、3D表面上のプリンテッドエレクトロニック、フィルムインサート成形、インモールドエレクトロニクス、3Dプリンテッドエレクトロニクス、ストラクチュラルエレクトロニクス

このレポートは3Dエレクトロニクス技術の市場を調査し、3Dエレクトロニクスの主要企業へのインタビューに基づいた全アプローチの概要を掲載しています。   主な掲載内容  ※目次より... もっと見る

 

 

出版社 出版年月 価格 ページ数 言語
IDTechEx
アイディーテックエックス
2020年9月12日 お問い合わせください
ライセンス・価格情報
注文方法はこちら
389 英語

※価格はデータリソースまでお問い合わせください。


 

Summary

このレポートは3Dエレクトロニクス技術の市場を調査し、3Dエレクトロニクスの主要企業へのインタビューに基づいた全アプローチの概要を掲載しています。
 
主な掲載内容 ※目次より抜粋
  • エグゼクティブサマリ
  • イントロダクション
  • 従来の2DPCB
  • 3D表面場のエレクトロニクス(3DMIDも含め)
  • インモールドエレクトロニクス(IME)と機能性フィルムインサート成形(FIM)
  • 3Dプリンテッドエレクトロニクス
  • 3Dエレクトロニクスとフレキシブルハイブリッドエレクトロニクス
  • 予測
Report Details
3D electronics is an emerging approach that enables electronics to be integrated within or onto the surface of objects. While it has long be used for adding antennas and simple conductive interconnects to the surface of 3D injection-molded plastic objects, more complex circuits are increasingly being added onto surfaces made from a variety of material by utilizing new techniques. Furthermore, in-mold electronics and 3D printed electronics enable complete circuits to be integrated within an object, offering multiple benefits that include simplified manufacturing and novel form factors. With 3D electronics, adding electronic functionality no longer requires incorporating a rigid, planar PCB into an object then wiring up the relevant switches, sensors, power sources and other external components.
 
This report from IDTechEx provides an extensive overview of all approaches to 3D electronics, informed by interviews with major players in each field. The pros and cons of each approach are weighed against each other for different applications, with numerous case studies showing how the different manufacturing techniques are deployed across the automotive, consumer goods and medical device sectors. Furthermore, through detailed analysis of the technologies and their requirements we identify innovation opportunities for both materials and manufacturing methods. All the approaches and technologies analyzed in this report are shown below on a roadmap that shows their progress from concept to commercialization for different applications.
 
 
Figure 1: The status of different 3D electronics technologies for different applications, from concept to commercialization. For more details please see the IDTechEx Report 3D Electronics 2020-2030.
Electronics applied to a circuit surface
The best-established approach to adding electrical functionality onto the surface of 3D objects is laser direct structuring (LDS), in which an additive in the injection molded plastic is selectively activated by a laser. This forms a pattern that is subsequently metallized using electroless plating. LDS saw tremendous growth around a decade ago, and is used to manufacture 100s of millions of devices each year, around 75% of which are antennas.
 
However, despite its high patterning speed and widespread adoption, LDS has some weaknesses that leave space for alternative approaches to surface metallization. Firstly, it is a two-step process that can require sending parts elsewhere for plating, thus risking IP exposure. It has a minimum resolution in mass production of around 75 um, thus limiting the line density, and can only be employed on molded plastic. Most importantly, LDS only enables a single layer of metallization, thus precluding cross-overs and hence substantially restricting circuit complexity.
 
Given these limitations, other approaches to applying conductive traces to the surfaces of 3D objects are gaining ground. Extruding conductive paste, a viscous suspension comprising multiple conductive flakes, is already used for a small proportion of antennas, and is the approach of choice for systems that deposit entire circuits onto 3D surfaces.
 
Aerosol jetting is another emerging metallization approach, in which a relatively low viscosity, usually conductive ink is atomised. This spray is then combined with an inert carrier gas and ejected from a nozzle. Aerosol jet has two notable advantages: it is capable of resolutions as fine as 10 um, and the nozzle can be placed a few mm away from the surface thus facilitating patterning of 3D surfaces with complex surface geometries. The downsides are the cost of the complex atomisation and delivery process, and the requirement to re-optimize the process for different inks.
 
An advantage of digital deposition methods of the incumbent LDS technology is that dielectric materials can also be deposited within the same printing system, thereby enabling cross-overs and hence much more complex circuits. Insulating and conductive adhesives can also deposited, enabling SMD components to be mounted onto the surface.
 
In-mold electronics
In mold electronics (IME) offers a commercially compelling proposition of integrating electronics into injection molded parts, reducing manufacturing complexity, lowering weight and enabling new form factors since rigid PCBs are no longer required. Furthermore, it relies on existing manufacturing techniques such as in-mold decoration and thermoforming, reducing the barriers to adoption. The basic principle is that a circuit is printed onto a thermoformable substrate, and SMD components mounted using conductive adhesives. The substrate is then thermoformed to the desired shape, and infilled with injection molded plastic. IME is especially well suited to human machine interfaces (HMIs) in both automotive interiors and the control panels of white goods, since decorative films can be used on the outer surface above capacitive touch sensors.
 
While IME is likely to dominate HMI interfaces in the future due to the ease of manufacture and compatibility with established manufacturing techniques, it does bring technical challenges. Chief among these is developing conductive and dielectric materials that can withstand the temperature of the thermoforming process along with the heat and pressure of injection molding. As such, materials suppliers are developing portfolios of materials aimed at IME, with conductive inks that can be deformed without cracking. Additional challenges include the development of electronic design software that can account for bending on circuits, and developing SMD component attachment methods that are reliable under the molding process.
 
Fully printed 3D electronics
The least developed technology is fully 3D printed electronics, in which dielectric materials (usually thermoplastics) and conductive materials are sequentially deposited. Combined with placed SMD components, this results in a circuit, potentially with a complex multilayer structure embedded in a 3D plastic object. The core value proposition is that each object and embedded circuit can be manufactured to a different design without the expense of manufacturing masks and molds each time.
 
Fully 3D printed electronics are thus well suited to applications where wide range of components need to be manufactured at short notice. Indeed, the US Army are currently trialling a ruggedized 3D printer to make replacement components in forward operating bases. The technology is also promising for applications where a customized shape and even functionality is important, for example medical devices such as hearing aids and prosthetics. The ability of 3D printed electronics to manufacture different components using the same equipment, and the associated decoupling of unit cost and volume, could also enable a transition to on-demand manufacturing, in which objects with electronic functionality are manufactured in response to specific customer requests (and possibly with bespoke features).
 
The challenges for fully 3D printed electronics are that manufacturing is fundamentally a much slower process than making parts via injection molding since each layer needs to be deposited sequentially. While the printing process can be accelerated using multiple nozzles, it is best targeted at applications where the customizability offers a tangible advantage. Ensuring reliability is also a challenge since with embedded electronics post-hoc repairs are impossible - one strategy is using image analysis to check each layer and perform any repairs before the next layer is deposited.
 
Comprehensive analysis and market forecasts
Our report discusses each approach to 3D electronics in considerable detail, evaluating the different technologies, their potential adoption barriers and their applicability to the different application areas. The report includes multiple company profiles based on interviews with major players across the different technologies. We also develop 10-year market forecasts for each technology and application sector, delineated by both revenue and area. We forecast the gradual decline of LDS and growth in extruded paste for consumer electronic antennas, and increased use of extrusion and aerosol especially for automotive applications. The most substantial growth is predicted for IME, which we predict will be widely adopted in car interiors and the control panels of white goods.
 
 
Figure 2: Forecast revenue for various categories of 3D printed electronics (LIFT, aerosol, LDS, two-shot molding and extruded paste are all methods for adding electronics to 3D surfaces). For more details please see the IDTechEx Report 3D Electronics 2020-2030.

 



ページTOPに戻る


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Long term vision for 3D electronics
1.2. Readiness level of 3D electronics technologies and applications
1.3. Metallization and materials for each 3D electronics methodology
1.4. Comparison of metallization methods (aerosol, inkjet, extruded conductive paste, laser direct structuring, print-then-plate, two-shot molding, laser induced forward transfer, electrohydrodynamic printing)
1.5. SWOT Analysis: Electronics onto 3D surfaces
1.6. Summary: Electronics onto 3D surfaces
1.7. SWOT analysis: In-mold electronics (IME)
1.8. In-mold electronics: Summary
1.9. SWOT analysis: 3D printed electronics
1.10. Summary: 3D printed electronics
1.11. 10-year forecast by revenue for different types of 3D electronics
1.12. 10-year forecast by area (sqm) for electronics on 3D surface. (Categories: LDS, extruded paste, aerosol, two-shot molding, LIFT)
1.13. 10-year forecast by revenue for electronics on 3D surface. (Categories: LDS, extruded paste, aerosol, two-shot molding, LIFT)
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1. Overview of the electronics market
2.2. What are molded interconnect devices (MIDs)
2.3. 3D electronics manufacturing method flowchart
2.4. IME: 3D friendly process for circuit making
2.5. Motivation for 3D electronics
2.6. Advantages of 3D electronics vs conventional PCBs
2.7. Comparing the production speed of approaches to 3D electronics
2.8. 3D electronics requires special electronic design software
2.9. Readiness level of 3D electronics technologies and applications
2.10. 2D printed electronics (on surface)
2.11. Printed Electronics: Commercial failures
2.12. Printed Electronics: Commercial successes
2.13. Benchmarking competitive processes to 3D electronics
3. TRADITIONAL 2D PCBS
3.1. Traditional PCBs: History
3.2. Traditional PCBs: Mounting components
3.3. Traditional PCBs: Layers
3.4. Traditional PCBs: Complexity
3.5. Traditional PCBs: Geography
3.6. Traditional PCBs: Prototyping
3.7. Traditional PCBs: Mechanics
3.8. Traditional PCBs: Heat
3.9. SWOT analysis: Traditional PCBs
4. ELECTRONICS ONTO 3D SURFACES (INCLUDING 3D MID)
4.1.1. Applying electronics to 3D surfaces (including molded interconnect devices)
4.1.2. MID challenges for LED integration
4.2. Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Metallization methods
4.2.1. Metallization methods.
4.2.2. Comparing selective metallization methods
4.2.3. Comparison of metallization methods (aerosol, inkjet, extruded conductive paste, laser direct structuring, print-then-plate, two-shot molding, laser induced forward transfer, electrohydrodynamic printing)
4.3. Aerosol printing
4.3.1. Aerosol deposition
4.3.2. Aerosol deposition onto 3D surfaces
4.3.3. Aerosol deposition vs LDS (laser direct structuring)
4.3.4. Applications of aerosol beyond antennas
4.3.5. Varying line width to control resistance.
4.3.6. Example aerosol jet printed functionality
4.3.7. Aerosol jet in R&D
4.3.8. Academic Research: Aerosol jet printed transistors
4.3.9. Academic research: Aerosol jet printing for the fabrication of terahertz metamaterials
4.3.10. Case study: Aerosol deposition of mobile phone antennas
4.3.11. Aerosol jet printing: SWOT
4.3.12. Company profile: Optomec
4.3.13. SWOT Analysis: Optomec
4.3.14. Company Profile: Integrated Deposition Solutions
4.3.15. SWOT Analysis: Integrated Deposition Solutions
4.4. Laser direct structuring
4.4.1. Laser direct structuring (LDS)
4.4.2. Laser direct structuring has many applications
4.4.3. Using LDS to make a bionic ant (LPKF, Festo)
4.4.4. Capabilities of laser direct structuring
4.4.5. Laser roughing to enhance adhesion
4.4.6. Galvanic rather than electroless plating
4.4.7. LDS: Fine pitch capability
4.4.8. LDS application examples: Insulin pump
4.4.9. LDS for IC packaging through-hole vias
4.4.10. Mass manufacturing the all-plastic-substrate paint?
4.4.11. Combining 3D printing with LDS for prototyping?
4.4.12. Expanding LDS MID to non-plastic substrates?
4.4.13. LDS MID 3D LED retrofit
4.4.14. LDS MID in LED with improved heat dissipation
4.4.15. LDS MID in sensors
4.4.16. LDS manufacturers authorised by LPKF
4.4.17. LDS MID application examples: Insulin pump and diagnostic laser pen
4.4.18. Laser direct structuring: SWOT
4.4.19. Company Profile: LPKF
4.4.20. SWOT analysis: LPKF
4.5. Inkjet printing
4.5.1. Inkjet printing conductive traces: Commercial and hobbyist
4.5.2. Inkjet onto 3D surfaces (Nano Dimension)
4.5.3. SWOT analysis: Inkjet printing electronics
4.5.4. SWOT analysis: Ceradrop
4.6. Extruded conductive paste
4.6.1. Extruding conductive paste for structurally-integrated antennas
4.6.2. Details of extruded paste printing.
4.6.3. Extruded conductive paste examples
4.6.4. SWOT Analysis: Extruded paste
4.6.5. Extrude molten solder
4.6.6. SWOT Analysis: Extrude molten solder
4.6.7. SWOT Analysis: Pulse Electronics (Fluidant)
4.7. Two-shot molding
4.7.1. Two shot molding: Process description
4.7.2. Comparing LDS and two-shot molding
4.7.3. SWOT analysis: Two-shot molding
4.8. Laser induced forward transfer
4.8.1. Laser induced forward transfer (LIFT)
4.8.2. How paste viscosity influences LIFT
4.8.3. SWOT analysis: Laser induced forward transfer
4.9. Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Materials
4.9.1. Material considerations for LDS
4.9.2. Ink requirements for aerosol printing
4.9.3. Beyond IME conductive inks: Adhesives
4.9.4. Conductive adhesives: General requirements and challenges
4.9.5. Different types of conductive adhesives
4.9.6. Conductive adhesives: Surviving the IME process
4.9.7. Attaching components to low temperature substrates
4.9.8. AlphaAssembly: Low temperature solder
4.9.9. Low temperature solder alloys
4.9.10. Low temperature soldering
4.9.11. Conductive paste bumping on flexible substrates
4.9.12. Ag pasted for die attachment
4.9.13. Safi-Tech: Ambient soldering with core-shell nanoparticles
4.9.14. Photonic soldering: A step up from sintering
4.9.15. Photonic soldering: Prospects and challenges
4.9.16. Photonic soldering: Substrate dependence.
4.9.17. Electrically conductive adhesives
4.9.18. Multilayer circuits: need for cross-overs in IME devices
4.9.19. Cross-over dielectric: Requirements
4.9.20. Cross-over dielectric: Flexibility tests
4.10. Electronics on 3D surfaces: Applications
4.10.1. Automotive applications of 3D electronics in development
4.10.2. LDS MID application examples: Automotive HMI
4.10.3. LDS MID application examples: Automotive HMI
4.10.4. LDS MID in LED implementation
4.10.5. MID application examples: Antenna
4.10.6. Applications of aerosol deposition
4.10.7. Conformal printing examples: Harvard University, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Optomec
4.11. Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Equipment companies
4.11.1. Neotech AMT
4.11.2. Equipment from Neotech-AMT
4.11.3. SWOT analysis: Neotech-AMT
4.11.4. Ceradrop
4.11.5. Ceradrop - printing ceramics
4.11.6. SWOT analysis: Ceradrop
4.12. Electronics onto 3D surfaces: Summary
4.12.1. SWOT Analysis: Electronics onto 3D surfaces
4.12.2. Summary: Electronics onto 3D surfaces
5. IN-MOLD ELECTRONICS (IME) AND FUNCTIONAL FILM INSERT MOLDING (FIM)
5.1.1. What is in-mold electronics (IME)?
5.1.2. Advantages of IME
5.1.3. Challenges for IME
5.1.4. Overview of key players across the supply chain
5.1.5. Examples of true structural electronics: Plastic Electronic, Smart Plastics Network
5.1.6. IME market forecast - application
5.1.7. IME surfaces and capabilities
5.1.8. Integrating IME into existing systems
5.2. In-mold electronics: Technologies and manufacturing methods
5.2.1. What is the in-mold electronic process?
5.2.2. In-mold electronics manufacturing - TactoTek
5.2.3. SMD assembly: before or after forming?
5.2.4. IME production: Required equipment set
5.2.5. In-mold decoration (IMD) production: Required equipment set
5.2.6. Processing conditions: Traditional electronics vs. IME
5.2.7. IME products have exceptional environmental tolerance
5.2.8. Aircraft aerofoil flap with integral heater for de-icing using in-mold electronics
5.2.9. IME requirements
5.2.10. Observations on the IME design process
5.2.11. Transfer printing: printing test strips & using lamination to compete with IME
5.2.12. PolyIC: inserting complex patterned functional films into 3D shaped parts
5.2.13. IME with functional films made with evaporated lines
5.2.14. Print-then-plate: Overview (Elephantech)
5.2.15. Print-then-plate: Advantages
5.2.16. Print-then-plate for in-mold electronics
5.2.17. SWOT analysis: Elephantech
5.2.18. Increasing number of research prototypes
5.2.19. Extending IME: Thermoformed polymeric actuator?
5.2.20. Thermoformed 3D shaped reflective LCD display
5.2.21. Thermoformed 3D shaped RGB AMOLED with LTPS
5.2.22. Molding electronics in 3D shaped composites
5.3. In-mold electronics: Materials
5.3.1. Stretchable carbon nanotube transparent conducting films
5.3.2. Prototype examples of carbon nanotube in-mold transparent conductive films
5.3.3. 3D touch using carbon nanobuds
5.3.4. In-mold and stretchable metal mesh transparent conductive films
5.3.5. Other IME transparent conductive film technologies
5.3.6. Prototype examples of in-mold and stretchable PEDOT:PSS transparent conductive films
5.3.7. CNBs: Insert film molding for 3D-shaped sensor transparent heaters
5.3.8. Benchmarking CNT 3D-shaped molded transparent heaters
5.3.9. Ultra fine metal mesh as transparent heater
5.3.10. Technology roadmap of ultra-fine metal mesh as transparent heater
5.3.11. Feature control capability of ultra fine metal mesh as transparent heater
5.3.12. IME: Value transfer from PCB board to ink
5.3.13. New ink requirements: Thermoformability
5.3.14. Evolution and improvements in performance of stretchable conductive inks
5.3.15. Performance of stretchable conductive inks
5.3.16. Bridging the conductivity gap between printed electronics and IME inks
5.3.17. The role of particle size in stretchable inks
5.3.18. Elantas: Selecting right fillers and binders to improve stretchability
5.3.19. E2IP Technologies/GGI Solutions: Particle-free IME inks
5.3.20. The role of resin in stretchable inks
5.3.21. New ink requirements: portfolio approach
5.3.22. IME materials: A portfolio approach
5.3.23. All materials in the stack must be compatible: Conductivity perspective
5.3.24. All materials in th

 

ページTOPに戻る

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

webからのご注文・お問合せはこちらのフォームから承ります

本レポートと同じKEY WORD()の最新刊レポート

  • 本レポートと同じKEY WORDの最新刊レポートはありません。

よくあるご質問


IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?


IDTechExはセンサ技術や3D印刷、電気自動車などの先端技術・材料市場を対象に広範かつ詳細な調査を行っています。データリソースはIDTechExの調査レポートおよび委託調査(個別調査)を取り扱う日... もっと見る


調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?


在庫のあるものは速納となりますが、平均的には 3-4日と見て下さい。
但し、一部の調査レポートでは、発注を受けた段階で内容更新をして納品をする場合もあります。
発注をする前のお問合せをお願いします。


注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?


1)お客様からの御問い合わせをいただきます。
2)見積書やサンプルの提示をいたします。
3)お客様指定、もしくは弊社の発注書をメール添付にて発送してください。
4)データリソース社からレポート発行元の調査会社へ納品手配します。
5) 調査会社からお客様へ納品されます。最近は、pdfにてのメール納品が大半です。


お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?


納品と同時にデータリソース社よりお客様へ請求書(必要に応じて納品書も)を発送いたします。
お客様よりデータリソース社へ(通常は円払い)の御振り込みをお願いします。
請求書は、納品日の日付で発行しますので、翌月最終営業日までの当社指定口座への振込みをお願いします。振込み手数料は御社負担にてお願いします。
お客様の御支払い条件が60日以上の場合は御相談ください。
尚、初めてのお取引先や個人の場合、前払いをお願いすることもあります。ご了承のほど、お願いします。


データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?


当社は、世界各国の主要調査会社・レポート出版社と提携し、世界各国の市場調査レポートや技術動向レポートなどを日本国内の企業・公官庁及び教育研究機関に提供しております。
世界各国の「市場・技術・法規制などの」実情を調査・収集される時には、データリソース社にご相談ください。
お客様の御要望にあったデータや情報を抽出する為のレポート紹介や調査のアドバイスも致します。



詳細検索

このレポートへのお問合せ

03-3582-2531

電話お問合せもお気軽に

 

2024/12/03 10:26

150.96 円

158.85 円

193.76 円

ページTOPに戻る