世界各国のリアルタイムなデータ・インテリジェンスで皆様をお手伝い

Redox Flow Batteries Market 2024-2034: Forecasts, Technologies, Markets


レドックスフロー電池市場 2024-2034:予測、技術、市場

この調査レポートでは、2020年から2034年までのレドックスフロー電池市場の10年間の市場予測、容量(MWh)と市場価値(億米ドル)の両方で提供しています。   主な掲載内容(目次より抜粋) ... もっと見る

 

 

出版社 出版年月 電子版価格 ページ数 言語
IDTechEx
アイディーテックエックス
2023年9月13日 US$7,000
電子ファイル(1-5ユーザライセンス)
ライセンス・価格情報
注文方法はこちら
211 英語

※ 調査会社の事情により、予告なしに価格が変更になる場合がございます。
最新の価格はデータリソースまでご確認ください。


 

Summary

この調査レポートでは、2020年から2034年までのレドックスフロー電池市場の10年間の市場予測、容量(MWh)と市場価値(億米ドル)の両方で提供しています。
 
主な掲載内容(目次より抜粋)
  • アプリケーション、収益源、LDS、市場タイミング
  • レドックスフロー電池の化学とプレーヤー
  • レドックスフロー電池の材料
  • LCOS計算
  • RFB市場の最新情報
  • レドックスフロー電池の予測 2024年~2034年
  • 企業プロファイル
 
Report Summary
As the volume of variable renewable energy (VRE) energy sources penetrating electricity grids increases globally, as does the need to manage the increasing uncertainty and variability in electricity supply. Grids will be relying on different solutions to manage this, which could include building of overcapacity and interconnections, but also energy storage solutions. Redox flow batteries will be a key energy storage technology to support increasing VRE penetration, with IDTechEx forecasting that the RFB market will be valued at US$2.8B in 2034.
 
Aside from pumped hydro, Li-ion batteries currently dominate the global stationary energy storage market, and they are suitable for large, grid-scale installations to provide ancillary and utility services. As VRE penetration increases however, demand for long duration energy storage (LDES) technologies is expected to increase. These technologies will be needed to dispatch energy over longer timeframes when energy from VRE sources is not available. Li-ion batteries start becoming less suitable for storing energy at durations greater than 6 hours, due to unit system cost increasing with duration of storage proportionally. Instead, RFBs only require the scaling of electrolyte storage tanks and electrolyte volumes to increase duration of storage, whereas cell stack configurations can remain unchanged, i.e., power and energy are decoupled. This results in a smaller and non-proportional increase in CAPEX with increasing duration of storage. This is part of the reason why redox flow batteries will start becoming useful for providing durations of storage greater than 6 hours.
 
It is also important to recognize that RFBs can provide a lower levelized cost of storage (LCOS) than Li-ion batteries. This is mainly due to the increased lifetime of RFBs, and many RFB manufacturers pride themselves on the fact that RFBs are reliable systems, with no significant degradation being observed over 20,000+ cycles for some chemistries. As a result, RFBs can dispatch greater volumes of energy capacity (approximately 4-5x) over their lifetime than Li-ion batteries, resulting in a lower LCOS.
 
Exploded RFB cell stack. Source: IDTechEx.
 
However, there are some factors limiting the rate of RFB deployments in the current stationary energy storage market. Firstly, while RFBs present a lower LCOS than Li-ion, the CAPEX per kWh of the most widely deployed RFB, the vanadium RFB (VRFB), is higher. This will naturally act as a blocker for stakeholders looking to deploy energy storage technologies for grid-scale applications where CAPEX is already expected to be in the tens- or hundreds-of-millions of dollars for Li-ion. The cost of VRFBs is limited by expensive vanadium electrolyte, as this comprises ~30-50% of unit cost. Other substantial costs come from materials and components in the cell stack (see below) including the membrane, bipolar plates, electrodes, gaskets, etc. VRFB cost reductions are only likely to come in the longer term and from increasing economies of scale, as well as improved and more automated manufacturing processes.
 
A second factor limiting RFB deployments is that, in the current market, most RFBs will be competing with Li-ion batteries for 4-hour grid-scale applications. Li-ion batteries are a widely deployed and well understood technology for these grid-scale ancillary and utility services, such as energy shifting, voltage and frequency control, peaker plant/transmission and distribution (T&D) deferral, etc. Therefore, most RFB deployments in the mid-2020s RFBs are likely to continue being pilot and demonstration projects and competing with Li-ion. This will be at least until demand for long duration energy storage (LDES) technologies starts to increase in the later part of the decade in some key countries. Such countries may have higher penetration of VRE, greater blackout risks, LDES targets and tenders, or are where funding into LDES technologies is already starting to be seen - such as in the US.
 
As well as VRFBs, other competing RFB technologies could look to take increasing RFB and stationary battery storage market share. These include all-iron, zinc-bromine (Zn-Br), zinc-iron (Zn-Fe), organic, hydrogen-bromine (H-Br) and hydrogen-manganese (H-Mn) RFBs. Some of these technologies offer a much lower CAPEX compared to VRFBs, due to the more widely available and cheaper materials used in the electrolyte. However, they may of course pose some technical downsides which could limit their commercial feasibility. For example, zinc-based RFBs will be prone to zinc-plating on the anode surface, resulting in dendrite growth. Therefore, more highly engineered materials will need to be used in the cell stack to either limit dendrite formation or resist their penetration. This IDTechEx report includes a benchmarking analysis, comparing RFB technology metrics such as CAPEX, electrolyte costs, energy density, energy efficiency, dendrite formation, etc.
 
Source: IDTechEx
 
While other RFB technologies may compete, there are far fewer companies developing any one of these specific RFB chemistries. For instance, the only companies developing all-iron, H-Br or H-Mn RFBs are ESS Inc, Elestor and RFC Power, respectively. Therefore, it is more likely that most RFB capacity installed globally will be from vanadium RFBs over the next few years, as 18 companies identified by IDTechEx are developing these systems. Of the key players identified, Rongke Power's large 400 MWh VRFB installation dwarfs all installations made by other players over the past decade. In 2022, Sumitomo Electric Industries installed a 51 MWh VRFB in Japan, and another notable player, Invinity, installed ~22 MWh of VRFBs across various locations in the UK, US, Canada, South Korea and Taiwan. CellCube also made some smaller installations. The only company to make non-VRFB installations in 2022 was Redflow, with their Zn-Br RFB technology, but these only accumulate to ~3 MWh installed in 2022. This IDTechEx report includes market analysis, including RFB player announcements, supply partnerships, company and chemistry market shares, historical RFB installations by region since 2010, and planned projects and production facilities.
 
This IDTechEx report also provides ten-year market forecasts on the redox flow battery market for the period 2020-2034, in both capacity (MWh) and market value (US$B). Capacity forecasts are provided by regional and chemistry splits. Regions include China, United States, Europe, Japan, Rest of Asia, and Rest of the World. Chemistry breakdowns include vanadium, all-iron, Zn-Br, Zn-Fe, H-Br, and organic redox flow batteries.
 
This report provides the following information:
  • Current and future market landscape of redox flow batteries, including key player activity, historic deployments from 2010-2023, deployments made by players and by chemistry, player and technology market share, planned future projects, production capacities and announcements, strategic agreements and funding.
  • Comprehensive analysis and discussion on applications, revenue streams, and market timing for RFBs in relation to demand for long duration energy storage (LDES) and increasing variable renewable energy (VRE) penetration.
  • Deep dive into RFB technologies and chemistries, with benchmark analysis including metrics such as CAPEX, electrolyte costs, energy density, energy efficiency, etc.
  • RFB chemistries covered include vanadium (VRFB), all-iron, zinc-bromine, zinc-iron/ferricyanide, organic, hydrogen-bromine, hydrogen-manganese, vanadium-bromine, iron-chromium and polysulfide-bromine.
  •  LCOS calculations and explanations for VRFBs vs Li-ion, for 4h, 6h, 8h, and 10h duration of storage.
  • Materials used in RFBs, including membranes, bipolar plates, electrodes, gaskets, sealants, vanadium electrolyte (mining, supply, recycling, leasing), and players.
  • Granular 10-year RFB market forecasts, by region (MWh), by chemistry (MWh), and by value (US$B) for the 2020-2034 period.
  • 20+ company profiles.


ページTOPに戻る


Table of Contents

 

ページTOPに戻る

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

webからのご注文・お問合せはこちらのフォームから承ります

本レポートと同じKEY WORD()の最新刊レポート

  • 本レポートと同じKEY WORDの最新刊レポートはありません。

よくあるご質問


IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?


IDTechExはセンサ技術や3D印刷、電気自動車などの先端技術・材料市場を対象に広範かつ詳細な調査を行っています。データリソースはIDTechExの調査レポートおよび委託調査(個別調査)を取り扱う日... もっと見る


調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?


在庫のあるものは速納となりますが、平均的には 3-4日と見て下さい。
但し、一部の調査レポートでは、発注を受けた段階で内容更新をして納品をする場合もあります。
発注をする前のお問合せをお願いします。


注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?


1)お客様からの御問い合わせをいただきます。
2)見積書やサンプルの提示をいたします。
3)お客様指定、もしくは弊社の発注書をメール添付にて発送してください。
4)データリソース社からレポート発行元の調査会社へ納品手配します。
5) 調査会社からお客様へ納品されます。最近は、pdfにてのメール納品が大半です。


お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?


納品と同時にデータリソース社よりお客様へ請求書(必要に応じて納品書も)を発送いたします。
お客様よりデータリソース社へ(通常は円払い)の御振り込みをお願いします。
請求書は、納品日の日付で発行しますので、翌月最終営業日までの当社指定口座への振込みをお願いします。振込み手数料は御社負担にてお願いします。
お客様の御支払い条件が60日以上の場合は御相談ください。
尚、初めてのお取引先や個人の場合、前払いをお願いすることもあります。ご了承のほど、お願いします。


データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?


当社は、世界各国の主要調査会社・レポート出版社と提携し、世界各国の市場調査レポートや技術動向レポートなどを日本国内の企業・公官庁及び教育研究機関に提供しております。
世界各国の「市場・技術・法規制などの」実情を調査・収集される時には、データリソース社にご相談ください。
お客様の御要望にあったデータや情報を抽出する為のレポート紹介や調査のアドバイスも致します。



1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Key conclusions
1.2. Applications, LDES and Market Timing
1.3. RFB technology benchmarking
1.4. Summary of RFB strengths and weaknesses
1.5. Which RFB technologies will prevail? (1)
1.6. Which RFB technologies will prevail? (2)
1.7. Materials overview
1.8. VRFB and stack cost breakdown
1.9. Cell stack materials map
1.10. Levelized cost of storage for LIB and RFB
1.11. RFB vs Li-ion
1.12. Rongke Power's 400 MWh VRFB
1.13. Recent installations by company
1.14. RFB installations to H2 2023
1.15. Technology market share
1.16. Funding received by company
1.17. Global RFB planned projects
1.18. RFB production facilities
1.19. Supply deals and partnerships
1.20. RFB forecasts 2020-2034 (MWh) commentary
1.21. RFB cumulative deployments share by region (MWh)
1.22. RFB forecasts 2020-2034 by chemistry (MWh) commentary
1.23. RFB forecasts 2020-2034 (US$B)
2. APPLICATIONS, REVENUE STREAMS, LDES AND MARKET TIMING
2.1. Executive Summary
2.2. Applications and revenue streams
2.2.1. Applications and revenues overview
2.2.2. Battery business models and revenue streams overview
2.2.3. Revenue streams descriptions
2.2.4. Values provided by RFBs in FTM ancillary services
2.2.5. Values provided by RFBs in FTM utility services
2.2.6. Values provided by RFBs for BTM - C&I applications
2.2.7. Microgrids and remote locations
2.2.8. Application examples
2.3. RFB Market Timing: VRE and LDES
2.3.1. RFBs for residential applications?
2.3.2. Centralized power grids and issues with flexibility
2.3.3. Phases and issues of VRE integration
2.3.4. Renewable energy curtailment
2.3.5. What is long duration energy storage?
2.3.6. Market timing: When will more grid-scale RFBs be needed? (1)
2.3.7. Market timing: When will more grid-scale RFBs be needed? (2)
2.3.8. Market timing: When will more grid-scale RFBs be needed? (3)
2.3.9. Market timing: When will more grid-scale RFBs be needed? (4)
2.3.10. Competing stationary storage technologies
2.3.11. Concluding remarks
3. REDOX FLOW BATTERY CHEMISTRIES AND PLAYERS
3.1. Executive summary
3.2. Background
3.2.1. Redox flow battery: Working principle
3.2.2. Definitions: RFB electrochemistry
3.2.3. Definitions: Efficiencies
3.2.4. RFBs: Energy and power (1)
3.2.5. RFBs: Energy and power (2)
3.2.6. RFBs: Fit-and-forget philosophy
3.2.7. Comparison of RFBs vs fuel cells
3.2.8. Choice of redox-active species and solvents (1)
3.2.9. Choice of redox-active species and solvents (2)
3.2.10. Redox flow battery classification (1)
3.2.11. Redox flow battery classification (2)
3.2.12. RFB historical timeline
3.3. RFB Chemistries
3.3.1. Iron-chromium RFB
3.3.2. Iron-chromium strengths and weaknesses
3.3.3. Polysulfides-bromine (PSB) RFB
3.3.4. PSB historical timeline
3.3.5. PSB key weakness
3.3.6. Vanadium-bromine (V-Br) RFB
3.3.7. V-Br strengths and weaknesses
3.3.8. All vanadium RFB (VRFB)
3.3.9. VRFB strengths and weaknesses
3.3.10. All-iron RFB
3.3.11. All-iron strengths and weaknesses
3.3.12. Zinc-bromine (Zn-Br) RFB
3.3.13. Zn-Br strengths and weaknesses
3.3.14. Zinc-iron (Zn-Fe) RFB
3.3.15. Alkaline Zn-Ferricyanide RFB
3.3.16. Zn-Fe strengths and weaknesses
3.3.17. Hydrogen-bromine (H-Br) RFB
3.3.18. H-Br Strengths and weaknesses
3.3.19. Hydrogen-Manganese (H-Mn) RFB
3.3.20. H-Mn strengths and weaknesses
3.3.21. Organic Redox Flow Battery (ORFB)
3.3.22. Classification of ORFBs
3.3.23. Active species for ORFBs
3.3.24. ORFBs strengths and weaknesses
3.4. RFB commercial activity by chemistry
3.4.1. RFBs with lack of commercial activity
3.4.2. VRFBs commercial activity
3.4.3. All-iron commercial activity (1)
3.4.4. All-iron commercial activity (2)
3.4.5. All-iron commercial activity (3)
3.4.6. Zn-Br commercial activity (1)
3.4.7. Zn-Br commercial activity (2)
3.4.8. Zn-Br commercial activity (3)
3.4.9. Zn-Fe commercial activity
3.4.10. H-Br commercial activity
3.4.11. H-Mn commercial activity
3.4.12. ORFBs commercial activity
3.5. RFB players and commercialized products by chemistry
3.5.1. Vanadium RFB players (1)
3.5.2. Vanadium RFB players (2)
3.5.3. All-iron, Zn-Br, Zn-Fe, H-Br RFB players
3.5.4. Organic and other RFB players
3.5.5. Summary of RFB strengths and weaknesses
3.5.6. RFB technology benchmarking
3.5.7. Which RFB technologies will prevail? (1)
3.5.8. Which RFB technologies will prevail? (2)
4. MATERIALS FOR RFBS
4.1. Introduction to materials for redox flow batteries
4.2. Membranes
4.2.1. Membranes overview
詳細検索

このレポートへのお問合せ

03-3582-2531

電話お問合せもお気軽に

 

2024/11/14 10:27

156.77 円

166.04 円

201.95 円

ページTOPに戻る