Summary
この調査レポートでは、2023-2033年のガス分離膜の重要な技術ロードマップ、企業環境、市場展望について詳細に調査・分析しています。
主な掲載内容（目次より抜粋）
-
ガス分離膜メーカー
-
再生可能天然ガス（バイオガスのアップグレード）： CO2/CH4
-
CCSと水素
-
ヘリウム分離
-
市場予測・展望
Report Summary
The commercial use of gas separation membranes is not new; the industry grew considerably from the 1980s to the early 2000s. Existing membranes are not suitable for every gas separation application, but in the right use-case (including appropriate feedstock, scale, and purity requirements) they can very effectively outcompete other separation techniques; this has resulted in the industry growing into a stable market of modest size.
The market is now entering a new growth phase. This is driven by key market factors, primarily renewable energy and decarbonization applications, and technology advancements responding to those needs. This market report provides a critical technology roadmap, company landscape and market outlook for this evolving industry.
Market developments: Gas separation challenges are central to major renewable energy and decarbonization applications.
As stated, there are many existing stable markets for gas separation membranes, for example nitrogen separation, but the focus of this market report is on the opportunity within emerging gas separation markets. This includes 10-year market forecasts for gas separation membranes in biogas upgrading, natural gas processing, CCUS and hydrogen production.
Detailed analysis of the commercial outlook, market drivers, pain points and company landscape are provided for:
-
Biogas upgrading to biomethane (renewable natural gas - RNG)
-
Carbon capture (post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion) andutilization in enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
-
Hydrogen infrastructure: blue hydrogen production, pipeline transportation and hydrogen carriers
.png)
Overview of the opportunities (gray) for use of separation membranes in renewable energy and decarbonization applications. Source: Gas Separation Membranes 2023-2033
A comprehensive overview of major membrane manufacturers, including key products, partnerships, and market developments, as well as interview-based profiles on key emerging companies is included.
This report concludes with an analysis of the helium market landscape and the role that membranes could play in both the production and recovery applications of this essential industry.
Technology developments: Advanced membrane materials and hybrid system solutions gain commercial traction.
There are a wide range of membrane materials including polymeric, ceramic, metallic and composite variants. There are also essential considerations to both their form factor (such as hollow fiber or spiral wound) and ultimately how they are incorporated into the industrial process (including flow rate, operating temperature, and pressure difference) to meet the necessary separation requirements.
There is, of course, competition between membrane players, but the greater challenge in the field is in demonstrating the techno-economic viability for their solutionvs incumbent separation techniques. For each market, outlined above, a comparison against alternative separation techniques (e.g., PSA or cryogenic) and discussion on pain points and technical requirements is provided.
Polymer membranes, including cellulose acetate, polyimide and polysulfone, dominate the current market. Many of these will be at the forefront of some of the key growth areas, such a biogas upgrading, but for other emerging applications the industry will need to explore different system designs and/or utilize materials pushing the Robeson upper bounds to gain any market share.
IDTechEx break these advancements in to two areas: next-generation materials and hybrid processes. The latter can make use of commercial membranes but does not use them in isolation; instead, there is a large amount of activity looking to incorporate membranes alongside other separation techniques (such as cryogenic and membrane separation units used in tandem) or within a novel integrated design (such as a membrane contactor).
There remains an extensive amount of R&D, from both academia and industry, in exploring advanced materials for gas separation membranes. Many of these developments are progressing in their technology and manufacturing readiness and beginning to gain some commercial traction. In the polymeric space there are numerous advancements for both direct material use or inclusion as part of a composite, the latter seeing some key developments in both thin-film composite (TFC) membranes and mixed matrix membranes (MMM); fixed site carriers (FSC), polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs), polybenzimidazole (PBI) based membranes and more have all seen promising early signs for commercial adoption.
Beyond polymer membranes, there is a wide range of alternatives that typically offer either higher selectivity (through their transport mechanisms) or advantageous physical properties, such as operating temperature or resistance to contaminants. This includes metalli3
c membranes, carbon-based membranes, ceramic membranes, and earlier-stage examples such as dual-phase membranes.
Understanding the technology landscape is essential to understanding the market outlook for this industry. This market report provides a detailed independent technology appraisal for these membrane materials including benchmarking studies, unresolved challenges, adoption roadmaps and manufacturer profiles.
ページTOPに戻る
Table of Contents
|
1. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
|
1.1. |
Introduction to gas separation membranes |
|
1.2. |
Key developments in the gas separation market |
|
1.3. |
Opportunity for gas separation membranes in energy and decarbonization applications |
|
1.4. |
Material overview for gas separation membranes |
|
1.5. |
Main gas separation polymer membrane manufacturers |
|
1.6. |
Commercial status of emerging materials |
|
1.7. |
Application overview for gas separation membranes |
|
1.8. |
Biogas upgrading presents a large opportunity |
|
1.9. |
CCS membrane summary |
|
1.10. |
Potential roles of gas separation membranes in the hydrogen economy |
|
1.11. |
Gas Separation Membrane Market Forecast: Energy and Carbon Capture |
|
1.12. |
Company Profiles |
|
2. |
INTRODUCTION |
|
2.1. |
Understanding the key developments in the gas separation market |
|
2.2. |
Overview |
|
2.3. |
Membranes: Operating principles |
|
2.4. |
Why use membranes for gas separation |
|
2.5. |
Understanding a Robeson plot |
|
2.6. |
Polymeric membrane module design |
|
2.7. |
Material developments for next-generation membranes |
|
2.8. |
Polymeric-based membranes for gas separation: Overview |
|
2.9. |
Ceramic-based membranes for gas separation: Overview |
|
2.10. |
Metallic-based membranes for gas separation: Overview |
|
2.11. |
Composite membranes for gas separation: Overview |
|
3. |
GAS SEPARATION MEMBRANE MANUFACTURERS |
|
3.1. |
History of gas separation membranes |
|
3.2. |
Air Liquide |
|
3.3. |
Air Products |
|
3.4. |
Honeywell UOP |
|
3.5. |
UBE |
|
3.6. |
Evonik |
|
3.7. |
SLB |
|
3.8. |
BORSIG |
|
3.9. |
MTR |
|
3.10. |
AIRRANE |
|
3.11. |
Main gas separation polymer membrane manufacturers |
|
4. |
RENEWABLE NATURAL GAS (UPGRADING BIOGAS): CO2/CH4 |
|
4.1. |
Key biomethane/RNG market developments |
|
4.2. |
Renewable Natural Gas: Membrane Outlook |
|
4.3. |
Biomethane: Overview |
|
4.4. |
The biomethane market |
|
4.5. |
Biomethane: Main plant players |
|
4.6. |
Main membrane players in biogas upgrading |
|
4.7. |
Upgrading biogas: Overview |
|
4.8. |
Upgrading strategy: Size and feedstock matters |
|
4.9. |
Major biogas upgrading projects using membranes |
|
4.10. |
Membrane separation and cryogenic distillation |
|
4.11. |
Membrane properties for biogas upgrading |
|
4.12. |
Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMM): CO2/CH4 |
|
4.13. |
Thermally rearranged polymer membranes |
|
4.14. |
CMS membranes: CO2/CH4 |
|
4.15. |
Porous carbon fiber for CO2/CH4 |
|
4.16. |
3-stage membrane for biogas upgrading |
|
4.17. |
Polymer membrane start-ups for biogas upgrading |
|
4.18. |
Key competitive commercial developments for biogas upgrading |
|
4.19. |
Key competitive commercial developments for biogas upgrading: MOFs |
|
4.20. |
Key competitive commercial developments for biogas upgrading: ZIFs |
|
5. |
CCUS AND HYDROGEN |
|
5.1. |
Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage Overview |
|
5.1.1. |
What is Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)? |
|
5.1.2. |
Why CCUS and why now? |
|
5.1.3. |
The CCUS value chain |
|
5.1.4. |
Main CO₂ capture systems |
|
5.1.5. |
Carbon capture: Technology summary |
|
5.1.6. |
The momentum behind CCUS is building up |
|
5.1.7. |
Trends in CO₂ capture sources |
|
5.1.8. |
Outlook for CCUS by CO₂ source sector |
|
5.1.9. |
Mixed performance from deployed CCUS projects |
|
5.1.10. |
Main CO₂ capture technologies |
|
5.1.11. |
Comparison of CO₂ capture technologies |
|
5.1.12. |
CO₂ capture: Technological gaps |
|
5.1.13. |
Metrics for CO₂ capture agents |
|
5.1.14. |
99% capture rate: Suitability of different PSCC technologies |
|
5.1.15. |
CCS membrane summary |
|
5.1.16. |
Membrane-based CO₂ separation |
|
5.2. |
Post-Combustion Carbon Capture: CO2/N2 |
|
5.2.1. |
Post-combustion CO₂ capture |
|
5.2.2. |
Post-combustion CCS membrane targets |
|
5.2.3. |
The challenges facing membranes for post-combustion carbon capture |
|
5.2.4. |
Air Liquide hybrid technology for CCUS: Overview |
|
5.2.5. |
Air Liquide hybrid technology for CCUS: Post-combustion |
|
5.2.6. |
Post-combustion carbon capture: Lotte Chemical |
|
5.2.7. |
Thin-film composite membranes |
|
5.2.8. |
Thin-film composite membranes: Challenges |
|
5.2.9. |
MTR: Post-combustion carbon capture |
|
5.2.10. |
MTR: CCUS Progression |
|
5.2.11. |
Hereon: TFCM for carbon capture |
|
5.2.12. |
FSC membranes: Post-combustion carbon capture overview |
|
5.2.13. |
FSC membranes - commercial developments |
|
5.2.14. |
FSC membranes - research advancements |
|
5.2.15. |
EU MEMBER project for CCUS |
|
5.2.16. |
Post-combustion capture: Dual-phase membranes |
|
5.2.17. |
Gas-liquid membrane contactor development for CCUS |
|
5.2.18. |
Membrane contactor development for CCUS |
|
5.2.19. |
Membrane-sorption hybrid system for CCUS |
|
5.3. |
Pre-combustion carbon capture |
|
5.3.1. |
Pre-combustion CO₂ capture- introduction |
|
5.3.2. |
Challenges for membranes with syngas separation |
|
5.3.3. |
Opportunity in IGCC plants for gas separation membranes: TFC |
|
5.3.4. |
Opportunity in IGCC plants for gas separation membranes: PBI |
|
5.3.5. |
Opportunity in IGCC plants for gas separation membranes: Metals and Ceramics |
|
5.4. |
Hydrogen |
|
5.4.1. |
Hydrogen separation membranes: application overview |
|
5.4.2. |
Polymer membrane developments for hydrogen separation |
|
5.4.3. |
Polymer membrane developments for hydrogen separation (2) |
|
5.4.4. |
CMS membranes for hydrogen separation |
|
5.4.5. |
MMM developments for hydrogen separation |
|
5.4.6. |
Blue hydrogen production |
|
5.4.7. |
Hydrogen carriers |
|
5.4.8. |
Deblending hydrogen |
|
5.5. |
Oxygen-separation |
|
5.5.1. |
Oxy-fuel combustion CO₂ capture |
|
5.5.2. |
Oxygen separation: membranes for oxy-fuel combustion |
|
ページTOPに戻る
本レポートと同分野（環境・エネルギー）の最新刊レポート
IDTechEx社の先端材料 - Advanced Materials分野での最新刊レポート
本レポートと同じKEY WORD（）の最新刊レポート
- 本レポートと同じKEY WORDの最新刊レポートはありません。
よくあるご質問
IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?
IDTechExはセンサ技術や3D印刷、電気自動車などの先端技術・材料市場を対象に広範かつ詳細な調査を行っています。データリソースはIDTechExの調査レポートおよび委託調査（個別調査）を取り扱う日... もっと見る
調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?
在庫のあるものは速納となりますが、平均的には 3-４日と見て下さい。
但し、一部の調査レポートでは、発注を受けた段階で内容更新をして納品をする場合もあります。
発注をする前のお問合せをお願いします。
注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?
1)お客様からの御問い合わせをいただきます。
2)見積書やサンプルの提示をいたします。
3)お客様指定、もしくは弊社の発注書をメール添付にて発送してください。
4)データリソース社からレポート発行元の調査会社へ納品手配します。
5) 調査会社からお客様へ納品されます。最近は、pdfにてのメール納品が大半です。
お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?
納品と同時にデータリソース社よりお客様へ請求書（必要に応じて納品書も）を発送いたします。
お客様よりデータリソース社へ（通常は円払い）の御振り込みをお願いします。
請求書は、納品日の日付で発行しますので、翌月最終営業日までの当社指定口座への振込みをお願いします。振込み手数料は御社負担にてお願いします。
お客様の御支払い条件が60日以上の場合は御相談ください。
尚、初めてのお取引先や個人の場合、前払いをお願いすることもあります。ご了承のほど、お願いします。
データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?
当社は、世界各国の主要調査会社・レポート出版社と提携し、世界各国の市場調査レポートや技術動向レポートなどを日本国内の企業・公官庁及び教育研究機関に提供しております。
世界各国の「市場・技術・法規制などの」実情を調査・収集される時には、データリソース社にご相談ください。
お客様の御要望にあったデータや情報を抽出する為のレポート紹介や調査のアドバイスも致します。
|
|
