Summary

U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market Overview

The U.S. agricultural micronutrient market is projected to reach $1,946.3 million by 2034 from $833.3 million in 2023, growing at a CAGR of 8.28% during the forecast period 2024-2034. This growth is expected to be driven by increasing awareness of soil health and crop nutrition, advancements in precision farming technologies, and the rising demand for high-quality, nutrient-rich crops. Enhanced sustainability practices and a shift toward environment-friendly farming methods are further expected to fuel market expansion. Strategic partnerships and acquisitions among key players would further enhance market presence and innovation. Additionally, supportive government policies, ongoing research and development in micronutrient formulations, and improved distribution networks are also expected to contribute to this positive outlook. Companies investing in advanced technologies, strategic collaborations, and innovative product development are expected to be well-positioned to capitalize on these trends and establish a strong market presence in the evolving U.S. agricultural micronutrient market.

Introduction of Agricultural Micronutrient

Agricultural Micronutrients are essential elements required in small quantities for optimal plant growth and development. These micronutrients include iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), molybdenum (Mo), boron (B), and chlorine (Cl). They are vital for numerous physiological functions in plants, such as enzyme activation, photosynthesis, and the synthesis of vital organic compounds. For instance, iron is crucial for chlorophyll synthesis and enzyme formation, while manganese acts as a cofactor in photosynthesis and nitrogen assimilation. Zinc is necessary for synthesizing growth hormones and proteins, and copper is involved in reproductive growth. Molybdenum aids in nitrogen fixation, boron is essential for cell wall formation and stability, and chlorine is important for osmosis and ionic balance. Ensuring an adequate supply of these micronutrients can significantly enhance crop yield and quality, contributing to sustainable agricultural practices.

Market Introduction

The U.S. agricultural micronutrient market plays a pivotal role in the agricultural industry, which is essential for economic development and food security within the country. Micronutrients are critical for plant growth and crop yield, but they are required only in small quantities. The study examines various applications, including cereals and grains, oilseeds and pulses, fruits and vegetables, turf and ornamentals, and others. Based on the type of micronutrient, the market has been segmented into boron, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, zinc, multi-micronutrient, and others. The study has further categorized the market based on the mode of application into fertigation, foliar spray, soil application, and seed treatment. Additionally, the research distinguishes between chelated and non-chelated micronutrients. The research methodology includes extensive primary interviews with in-house experts, industry leaders, and market players, complemented by secondary research utilizing a variety of paid and unpaid databases. Analytical tools have been employed to construct forecasts and predictive models, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of market dynamics and future trends.

Industrial Impact

The U.S. agricultural micronutrient market significantly impacts crop production, technological innovation, and sustainable farming practices. Advances in micronutrient formulations and delivery methods, such as chelated micronutrients and foliar spray applications, enhance nutrient efficiency and uptake in crops. This has promoted collaborations between agricultural input companies and research institutions, driving innovation and expanding the frontiers of agricultural science. Hence, the focus on optimizing plant nutrition and improving soil health aligns with sustainable agriculture goals, thereby influencing farming practices and promoting the adoption of eco-friendly micronutrient solutions.

The key players operating in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market include Mosaic, Koch Industries Inc., The Andersons, Inc., Helena Agri, Enterprises, LLC, Yara, Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., Brandt, Inc., SQM S.A., Nouryon, AgroLiquid, Verdesian Life Sciences, Haifa Negev technologies LTD, Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc., Western, Nutrients Corporation, and Simplot Turf & Horticulture, among others. These companies have been focusing on strategic partnerships, collaborations, and acquisitions to enhance their product offerings and expand their market presence.

Market Segmentation:

Segmentation 1: by Crop Type
• Cereals and Grains
• Oilseeds and Pulses
• Fruits and Vegetables
• Turf and Ornamentals
• Others

Cereals and Grains Segment to Dominate the U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Crop Type)

Cereals and grains constitute the dominant crop type segment in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market, playing a pivotal role in the nation's agricultural output and food supply chain. These crops, including wheat, corn, barley, and rice, are essential for both domestic consumption and international trade. Cereals and grains are fundamental to the agricultural landscape of the U.S., which is driving demand for high-quality yields and nutritional efficiency. This has led to increased adoption of micronutrient-enhanced fertilizers and soil amendments tailored to the specific needs of these staple crops. The USDA initiated the Fertilizer Production Expansion Program (FPEP) in September 2022 and provided grants to support the expansion of fertilizer and nutrient alternatives manufacturing and availability across the country. For instance, Mosaic and AgBiome announced a groundbreaking collaboration in March 2021 to develop biological plant nutrition products. Their joint efforts aim to meet the growing demand for natural solutions that enhance soil fertility, improve nutrition, and elevate crop quality, aligning with the ongoing innovations in micronutrient technologies and agricultural sustainability. The dominance of cereals and grains in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market underscores their critical role in ensuring national food security and economic stability. Moreover, advances in micronutrient technologies, coupled with supportive government policies and innovative partnerships, are expected to continue to drive productivity and sustainability across crop types.

Segmentation 2: by Product
• Boron
• Copper
• Iron
• Manganese
• Molybdenum
• Zinc
• Multi-Micronutrient
• Others

Multi-Micronutrient Segment to Dominate the Market (by Product)

The landscape of U.S. agriculture has been witnessing a significant shift toward multi-micronutrients within the micronutrient market. While individual micronutrients such as zinc, boron, and copper hold importance, multi-micronutrients are rapidly emerging as the preferred choice for farmers seeking a comprehensive approach to crop health and yield improvement. This dominance can be attributed to several key factors. Multi-micronutrients provide a balanced combination of essential micronutrients, ensuring plants receive the optimal levels of each element for proper growth and development, which eliminates the need for multiple applications of single-micronutrient fertilizers, saving farmers time, resources, and labor. Soil testing often reveals deficiencies in multiple micronutrients. Multi-micronutrients offer a targeted solution, addressing these complex deficiencies in one application, leading to improved crop health and overall yield. The market is further evolving through strategic acquisitions, such as the one in March 2021, where Koch Agronomic Services acquired Compass Minerals' micronutrient division for $60 million. This strategic move allowed Koch Agronomic Services to expand its product portfolio in the agricultural sector, focusing on enhancing crop growth and yield. Compass Minerals opted to sell the division as part of its asset optimization strategy, redirecting efforts to other areas of its business.

Segmentation 3: by Application Mode
• Fertigation
• Foliar Spray
• Soil Application
• Seed Treatment

Foliar Spray to Dominate the U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Application Mode)

Foliar spray application has emerged as the dominant segment in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market. This trend can be attributed to several factors, including its efficiency in delivering nutrients directly to plant leaves, leading to quicker absorption and faster results. As a result, foliar spray application has become the preferred method among farmers seeking to optimize crop yield and quality. In recent years, several companies have launched innovative foliar spray micronutrient products, further cementing the segment's dominance. In August 2023, WinField United introduced MAX-IN Ultra ZMB Plus, a new foliar spray micronutrient combining zinc, manganese, and boron into a single product. Designed to address widespread deficiencies in corn crops, this innovation enhances leaf growth, disease resistance, and overall crop performance with a single application. Similarly, in October 2023, ICL America do Sul launched four new water-soluble fertilizers under the Nova brand in North America. These products, Nova PULSE, Nova FINISH, Nova ELEVATE, and Nova FLOW, deliver essential micronutrients tailored to crop nutrient demands. The products offer comprehensive solutions to mitigate nutrient deficiencies, alleviate plant stress, and enhance crop growth at all stages. They are designed for fertigation and foliar spray application. The foliar spray application mode segment dominates the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market, supported by continuous product innovation, government initiatives, and growing awareness among farmers. As the agriculture industry evolves, this application mode is expected to maintain its leading position, driven by its proven benefits and ongoing efforts to enhance its effectiveness.

Segmentation 4: by Form
• Chelated
• Non-Chelated

Recent Developments in the U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market

• In February 2024, Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC announced the expansion of its Zypro soil amendment label to include side-dress fertilizer applications. This stabilized enzyme technology, which has demonstrated an 83% win rate and a 5.8 bushel/acre yield increase in corn trials, aims to improve nutrient management on more acres.
• In May 2023, Yara announced plans to construct a new global production plant for specialty crop nutrition products and biostimulants near its existing site in Yorkshire, U.K. Expected to be operational by the end of 2025, this facility would be one of the largest of its kind, doubling the capacity of YaraVita products, which have experienced a fivefold sales increase over the past 20 years. By focusing on enhancing crop yields, quality, and resilience to climate change, this plant would support Yara’s global growth strategy.
• In July 2023, Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. announced a collaboration with ZeaKal to commercialize ZeaKal’s novel photosynthesis trait technology, PhotoSeed, for U.S. soybean growers. This technology increases photosynthetic capacity, resulting in improved oil and protein content without compromising yields.
• In June 2022, The Andersons Inc. launched MicroMark DG, a new line of granular micronutrients featuring dispersing granule (DG) technology. This advancement would not only enhance the company’s product portfolio but also positively impact the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market by providing farmers with effective and versatile solutions for various crop applications, thereby contributing to overall agricultural productivity and sustainability.
• In April 2021, Koch Agronomic Services, LLC strategically acquired Compass Minerals' North American micronutrient assets, including the global intellectual property rights, trademarks, and patents associated with the Wolf Trax, Rocket Seeds, and Hydro Bullet product platforms. This acquisition has significantly enhanced Koch's portfolio, allowing the company to offer a broader range of innovative solutions that improve nutrient efficiency for growers.

Demand - Drivers, Limitations, and Opportunities

Market Demand: Increasing Demand for High-Yield Crops

The increasing demand for high-yield crops is a significant driver in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market. As the global population continues to grow, there is expected to be a pressing need to produce more food on existing agricultural land. To meet this challenge, farmers are adopting advanced agricultural practices, including the precise application of micronutrients, which are essential for enhancing crop yields and improving crop quality. Micronutrients such as zinc, iron, and manganese play crucial roles in plant growth, aiding in essential physiological processes such as photosynthesis, enzyme function, and resistance to diseases. By ensuring that crops receive adequate micronutrient nutrition, farmers can achieve higher productivity and better-quality produce, thereby supporting food security and boosting the profitability of the agricultural sector.

Overall, the increasing demand for high-yield crops is a critical driver in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market, spurring innovation and investment in this sector. By adopting advanced micronutrient formulations, farmers can achieve higher productivity and better-quality yields, contributing to food security and economic growth. As the market continues to evolve, the focus on high-yield crops will remain crucial, driving further advancements and ensuring sustainability in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market.

Market Challenges: High Cost of Micronutrient Fertilizers

The high cost of micronutrient fertilizers might present a significant restraint in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market. These fertilizers, which are essential for addressing nutrient deficiencies and enhancing crop yields, often come at a premium price. The elevated costs can be attributed to the complex manufacturing processes and the need for precise formulation and application methods. For many farmers, especially those operating small- to medium-sized farms, the financial burden of investing in these high-cost inputs can be prohibitive. This financial strain might limit the adoption of micronutrient fertilizers, potentially leading to suboptimal crop performance and lower overall agricultural productivity.

Despite the high costs, efforts are being made to overcome this restraint. Advances in technology and increased research investments are leading to the development of more cost-effective micronutrient formulations. Bulk purchasing and cooperative buying strategies among farmers are also helping to reduce individual costs. Furthermore, government programs and subsidies aimed at supporting sustainable farming practices are beginning to include provisions for micronutrient fertilizers, thereby easing the financial burden on farmers. As these solutions continue to evolve, the adoption of micronutrient fertilizers is expected to increase, ensuring better crop health and productivity across the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market.

Market Opportunities: Rising Demand for Food Security

The increasing emphasis on food security presents a substantial opportunity for the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market. With global populations on the rise, the necessity for a stable and adequate food supply is becoming ever more critical. Micronutrient fertilizers play a crucial role in enhancing crop yields and improving the nutritional quality of food, which directly contributes to food security. This demand is expected to create a favorable market environment for the increased adoption and innovation of micronutrient fertilizers as farmers and agricultural stakeholders seek to maximize productivity and meet growing food needs.

Overall, the increasing emphasis on food security offers a promising growth avenue for the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market. The need to produce more nutritious and abundant food supplies drives the adoption of micronutrient fertilizers. With ongoing research, technological advancements, and supportive agricultural policies, the market is well-positioned to address the challenges of food security. This opportunity not only benefits the agricultural sector by enhancing crop yields and quality but also contributes to the broader goal of ensuring a sustainable and secure food supply.

How can this report add value to an organization?

Product/Innovation Strategy: The product segment helps the reader understand the different applications of agricultural micronutrient products available based on crop type (oilseeds and pulses, fruits and vegetables, turf and ornamentals, others), by product (boron, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, zinc, multi-micronutrient, others), application mode (fertigation, foliar spray, soil application, seed treatment), by form (chelated, non-chelated), others. The market is poised for significant expansion with ongoing technological advancements, increased investments, and growing awareness of the importance of agricultural micronutrients. Therefore, the agricultural micronutrient business is a high-investment and high-revenue generating model, which is expected to open new avenues of growth for the market stakeholders.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: The U.S. agricultural micronutrient market has been growing at a rapid pace. The market offers enormous opportunities for existing and emerging market players. Some of the strategies covered in this segment are mergers and acquisitions, product launches, partnerships and collaborations, business expansions, and investments. The strategies preferred by companies to maintain and strengthen their market position primarily include product development.

Competitive Strategy: The key players in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market analyzed and profiled in the study include manufacturers and retailers. Additionally, a comprehensive competitive landscape such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations are expected to aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.

Research Methodology

Factors for Data Prediction and Modelling

• The scope of the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market report has been focused on application and product only.
• The base currency considered for the market analysis is US$. Currencies other than the US$ have been converted to the US$ for all statistical calculations, considering the average conversion rate for that particular year.
• The currency conversion rate has been taken from the historical exchange rate of the Oanda website.
• Nearly all the recent developments from January 2021 to June 2024 have been considered in this research study.
• The information rendered in the report is a result of in-depth primary interviews, surveys, and secondary analysis.
• Where relevant information was not available, proxy indicators and extrapolation were employed.
• Any economic downturn in the future has not been taken into consideration for the market estimation and forecast.
• Technologies currently used are expected to persist through the forecast with no major breakthroughs in technology.

Market Estimation and Forecast

This research study involves the usage of extensive secondary sources, such as certified publications, articles from recognized authors, white papers, annual reports of companies, directories, and major databases to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market.

The process of market engineering involves the calculation of the market statistics, market size estimation, market forecast, market crackdown, and data triangulation (the methodology for such quantitative data processes is explained in further sections). The primary research study has been undertaken to gather information and validate the market numbers for segmentation types and industry trends of the key players in the market.

Primary Research

The primary sources involve industry experts from the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market and various stakeholders in the ecosystem. Respondents such as CEOs, vice presidents, marketing directors, and technology and innovation directors have been interviewed to obtain and verify both qualitative and quantitative aspects of this research study.

The key data points taken from primary sources Include:

• validation and triangulation of all the numbers and graphs
• validation of reports segmentation and key qualitative findings
• understanding the competitive landscape
• validation of the numbers of various markets for market type
• percentage split of individual markets for geographical analysis

Secondary Research

This research study of the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market involves the usage of extensive secondary research, directories, company websites, and annual reports. It also makes use of databases, such as Hoovers, Bloomberg, Businessweek, and Factiva, to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the global market. In addition to the aforementioned data sources, the study has been undertaken with the help of other data sources and websites, such as IRENA and IEA.

Secondary research was done in order to obtain crucial information about the industry’s value chain, revenue models, the market’s monetary chain, the total pool of key players, and the current and potential use cases and applications.

The key data points taken from secondary research include:

• segmentations and percentage shares
• data for market value
• key industry trends of the top players of the market
• qualitative insights into various aspects of the market, key trends, and emerging areas of innovation
• quantitative data for mathematical and statistical calculations

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The companies profiled in the U.S. agricultural micronutrient market have been selected based on inputs gathered from primary experts and analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, and market penetration.

Some of the prominent names in this market are:

• Mosaic
• Koch Industries Inc.
• The Andersons, Inc.
• Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC
• Yara
• Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.
• Brandt, Inc.
• SQM S.A.
• Nouryon
• AgroLiquid
• Verdesian Life Sciences
• Haifa Negev technologies LTD
• Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc.
• Western Nutrients Corporation
• Simplot Turf & Horticulture

Companies not part of the aforementioned pool have been well represented across different sections of the report (wherever applicable).

ページTOPに戻る

Table of Contents

Executive Summary
Scope and Definition
1 Markets
1.1 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment
1.1.1 Increase in the Use of Precision Agriculture Techniques to Optimize Micronutrient Application
1.1.2 Growth in the Emphasis on Sustainable and Organic Farming
1.1.3 Rise in the Development and Adoption of Biological and Organic Micronutrient Formulations
1.2 Supply Chain Overview
1.2.1 Value Chain Analysis
1.2.2 Pricing Forecast
1.3 Regulatory Landscape
1.4 Stakeholder Analysis
1.4.1 Use Case
1.4.2 End User and Buying Criteria
1.4.3 List of Key Players in the Ecosystem
1.5 Impact Analysis for Key Global Events
1.5.1 COVID-19 Pandemic
1.5.2 Russia-Ukraine War
1.6 Area of Innovation and Development
1.7 U.S. Micronutrient Profile
1.7.1 Deficiency Status of Micronutrient in U.S. Soil
1.7.2 Symptoms of Deficiency and Critical Limits
1.7.3 Micronutrients and Their Functions
1.8 Market Dynamics Overview
1.8.1 Market Drivers
1.8.1.1 Increasing Demand for High-Yield Crops
1.8.1.2 Supportive Government Policies and Subsidies
1.8.1.3 Increasing Recognition of Widespread Micronutrient Deficiencies
1.8.2 Market Restraints
1.8.2.1 High Cost of Micronutrient Fertilizers
1.8.2.2 Impact of Fluctuating Commodity Prices and Trade Uncertainties
1.8.3 Market Opportunities
1.8.3.1 Rising Demand for Food Security
1.8.3.2 Collaborations Driving Product Development
2 Application
2.1 Application Segmentation
2.2 Application Summary
2.3 U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Crop Type)
2.3.1 Cereals and Grains
2.3.2 Oilseeds and Pulses
2.3.3 Fruits and Vegetables
2.3.4 Turf and Ornamentals
2.3.5 Others
2.4 Micronutrient Deficiency (by Crop Type)
3 Products
3.1 Product Segmentation
3.2 Product Summary
3.3 U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Product)
3.3.1 Boron
3.3.2 Copper
3.3.3 Iron
3.3.4 Manganese
3.3.5 Molybdenum
3.3.6 Zinc
3.3.7 Multi-Micronutrient
3.3.8 Others
3.3.9 Symptoms of Micronutrient Deficiency
3.3.10 Soil Conditions Leading to Micronutrient Deficiencies in Different Crops
3.4 U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Application Mode)
3.4.1 Fertigation
3.4.2 Foliar Spray
3.4.3 Soil Application
3.4.4 Seed Treatment
3.4.5 Suggested Application Methods for Various Micronutrient
3.5 U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Form)
3.5.1 Chelated
3.5.2 Non-Chelated
4 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles
4.1 Next Frontiers
4.2 Strategic Initiatives
4.3 Company Profiles
4.3.1 Mosaic
4.3.1.1 Overview
4.3.1.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.1.3 Top Competitors
4.3.1.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.1.5 Key Personnel
4.3.1.6 Analyst View
4.3.1.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.2 Koch Industries, Inc.
4.3.2.1 Overview
4.3.2.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.2.3 Top Competitors
4.3.2.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.2.5 Key Personnel
4.3.2.6 Analyst View
4.3.2.7 Market Share
4.3.3 The Andersons, Inc.
4.3.3.1 Overview
4.3.3.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.3.3 Top Competitors
4.3.3.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.3.5 Key Personnel
4.3.3.6 Analyst View
4.3.3.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.4 Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC
4.3.4.1 Overview
4.3.4.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.4.3 Top Competitors
4.3.4.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.4.5 Key Personnel
4.3.4.6 Analyst View
4.3.4.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.5 Yara
4.3.5.1 Overview
4.3.5.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.5.3 Top Competitors
4.3.5.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.5.5 Key Personnel
4.3.5.6 Analyst View
4.3.5.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.6 Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.
4.3.6.1 Overview
4.3.6.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.6.3 Top Competitors
4.3.6.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.6.5 Key Personnel
4.3.6.6 Analyst View
4.3.6.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.7 Brandt, Inc.
4.3.7.1 Overview
4.3.7.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.7.3 Top Competitors
4.3.7.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.7.5 Key Personnel
4.3.7.6 Analyst View
4.3.7.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.8 SQM S.A.
4.3.8.1 Overview
4.3.8.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.8.3 Top Competitors
4.3.8.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.8.5 Key Personnel
4.3.8.6 Analyst View
4.3.8.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.9 Nouryon
4.3.9.1 Overview
4.3.9.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.9.3 Top Competitors
4.3.9.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.9.5 Key Personnel
4.3.9.6 Analyst View
4.3.9.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.10 AgroLiquid
4.3.10.1 Overview
4.3.10.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.10.3 Top Competitors
4.3.10.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.10.5 Key Personnel
4.3.10.6 Analyst View
4.3.10.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.11 Verdesian Life Sciences
4.3.11.1 Overview
4.3.11.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.11.3 Top Competitors
4.3.11.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.11.5 Key Personnel
4.3.11.6 Analyst View
4.3.11.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.12 Haifa Negev technologies LTD
4.3.12.1 Overview
4.3.12.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.12.3 Top Competitors
4.3.12.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.12.5 Key Personnel
4.3.12.6 Analyst View
4.3.12.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.13 Wilbur-Ellis Holdings, Inc.
4.3.13.1 Overview
4.3.13.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.13.3 Top Competitors
4.3.13.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.13.5 Key Personnel
4.3.13.6 Analyst View
4.3.13.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.14 Western Nutrients Corporation
4.3.14.1 Overview
4.3.14.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.14.3 Top Competitors
4.3.14.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.14.5 Key Personnel
4.3.14.6 Analyst View
4.3.14.7 Market Share, 2023
4.3.15 Simplot Turf & Horticulture
4.3.15.1 Overview
4.3.15.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
4.3.15.3 Top Competitors
4.3.15.4 Target Customers/End Users
4.3.15.5 Key Personnel
4.3.15.6 Analyst View
4.3.15.7 Market Share, 2023
5 Research Methodology
5.1 Data Sources
5.1.1 Primary Data Sources
5.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
5.1.3 Data Triangulation
5.2 Market Estimation and Forecast
List of Figures
Figure 1: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Scenario), $Million, 2023, 2026, and 2034
Figure 2: Pricing Analysis for U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market, $/Ton 2024,2030, and 2034
Figure 3: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Crop Type), $Million, 2024, 2030, and 2034
Figure 4: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Product), $Million, 2024, 2030, and 2034
Figure 5: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Application Mode), $Million, 2024, 2030, and 2034
Figure 6: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Form), $Million, 2024, 2030, and 2034
Figure 7: Key Events
Figure 8: Global Agrifoodtech Investment, $Billion, 2018-2023
Figure 9: U.S. Organic Imports, Top Product Groups, 2022
Figure 10: Supply Chain and Risks within the Supply Chain
Figure 11: Value Chain Analysis
Figure 12: Farm Gate vs. Distribution Level: Average Pricing Scenario, 2023-2026 ($/Ton)
Figure 13: Company Developments, 2021-2024
Figure 14: Micronutrient Deficiency Status of U.S. Soil
Figure 15: Impact Analysis of Market Navigating Factors, 2023-2034
Figure 16: Average Total Production, Harvested Area, and Average Yield of Maize, Soybean, Wheat, and Rice in U.S., 2013-2022
Figure 17: Cereal Yield and Fertilizer Usage, 2019 to 2021
Figure 18: U.S. Imports and Exports of Dry Pulses, 2020-2023
Figure 19: U.S. Micronutrient Market for Turf and Ornamentals , $Million, 2023-2034
Figure 20: Fertilizer Consumption in U.S., 2019-2022
Figure 21: Strategic Initiatives, 2021-2024
Figure 22: Share of Strategic Initiatives
Figure 23: Data Triangulation
Figure 24: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach
Figure 25: Assumptions and Limitations
List of Tables
Table 1: Market Snapshot
Table 2: Opportunities
Table 3: Trends Overview
Table 4: Deficiency Symptoms and Their Critical Limits
Table 5: Micronutrients and Their Functions in Plants
Table 6: Key Programs/Subsidies in U.S. by Government Agencies
Table 7: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Crop Type), $Million, 2023-2034
Table 8: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Crop Type), Thousand Tons, 2023-2034
Table 9: Crop Sensitivity Level for Micronutrient Deficiencies
Table 10: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Product), $Million, 2023-2034
Table 11: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Product), Thousand Tons, 2023-2034
Table 12: Symptoms of Micronutrient Deficiency (by Element)
Table 13: Soil Conditions Leading to Micronutrient Deficiencies in Different Crops
Table 14: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Application Mode), $Million, 2023-2034
Table 15: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Application Mode), Thousand Tons, 2023-2034
Table 16: Suggested Application Methods for Various Micronutrient
Table 17: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Form), $Million, 2023-2034
Table 18: U.S. Agricultural Micronutrient Market (by Form), Thousand Tons, 2023-2034
Table 19: Market Share

Press Release