Summary

Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market was valued at USD 717.20 million in 2023 and is anticipated to project steady growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 4.45% through 2029. The Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market includes various diagnostic technologies and solutions designed to detect and manage bloodstream infections. It has shown consistent growth and is expected to expand further. Growth drivers include rising bloodstream infection rates, advances in diagnostic technology, and strategic efforts to prevent and control infections in healthcare settings. These factors support ongoing market expansion and innovation in diagnostic solutions.
Key Market Drivers
Increasing Incidence of Bloodstream Infections
As the global population ages and chronic diseases become more prevalent, the demand for healthcare services, including diagnostic testing for infections, rises correspondingly. Elderly individuals and those with compromised immune systems are particularly susceptible to bloodstream infections, necessitating frequent and accurate diagnostic testing to identify pathogens early and initiate timely treatment. Modern medical practices increasingly rely on invasive procedures such as surgeries, catheterizations, and organ transplants, which carry a risk of introducing pathogens into the bloodstream. These procedures are essential for treating various conditions but also increase the likelihood of bloodstream infections, particularly in hospital settings where patients may already have compromised immune systems. Patients with conditions such as HIV/AIDS, cancer undergoing chemotherapy, organ transplantation recipients, and those on immunosuppressive therapies are more susceptible to bloodstream infections. The growing prevalence of these conditions globally contributes significantly to the overall burden of bloodstream infections, driving the need for reliable and comprehensive diagnostic testing to manage and treat infections effectively.
The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a significant challenge in treating bloodstream infections. Antibiotic resistance develops due to overuse and misuse of antibiotics, making infections harder to treat and increasing the risk of treatment failure. Accurate diagnostic testing plays a crucial role in identifying the specific pathogens and their resistance profiles, guiding healthcare providers in selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapies tailored to individual patients. Bloodstream infections are associated with increased healthcare costs, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality rates if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Effective bloodstream infection testing helps reduce healthcare costs by enabling timely initiation of appropriate therapies, minimizing complications, and improving patient outcomes. Healthcare systems worldwide recognize the cost-effectiveness of investing in accurate diagnostic testing to prevent and manage bloodstream infections, driving market growth. Governments and healthcare organizations globally emphasize infection prevention and control measures to reduce healthcare-associated infections, including bloodstream infections. Regulatory bodies implement guidelines and standards that mandate diagnostic testing protocols in healthcare settings, promoting the adoption of standardized and effective diagnostic technologies. These initiatives support market growth by creating a conducive environment for innovation, investment, and adoption of advanced diagnostic solutions.
The increasing incidence of bloodstream infections underscores the critical need for reliable and timely diagnostic testing solutions in healthcare settings. This demand drives innovation, investment, and market growth in the Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market, aiming to improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and effectively manage infectious diseases worldwide.
Technological Advancements in Diagnostic Testing
New diagnostic technologies, such as molecular methods like polymerase chain reaction (PCR), nucleic acid amplification, and sequencing technologies, offer improved sensitivity and specificity in detecting pathogens responsible for bloodstream infections. These advancements enable healthcare providers to identify a broader range of pathogens accurately and swiftly from blood samples, even at low concentrations, which traditional culture methods may lack. Automated blood culture systems and molecular diagnostics significantly reduce the turnaround time for bloodstream infection testing. Traditional blood culture methods can take 24-48 hours or longer to produce results, whereas automated systems and molecular assays can provide actionable results within hours. This rapid turnaround time is critical in clinical settings, allowing healthcare providers to initiate targeted antimicrobial therapy promptly, thereby improving patient outcomes and potentially reducing hospital stays.
Advances in point-of-care testing technologies contribute to the growth of the bloodstream infection testing market by enabling rapid and near-real-time diagnosis at the patient's bedside or in remote settings. POCT devices for bloodstream infections leverage miniaturized molecular and immunodiagnostic techniques, offering healthcare providers immediate access to diagnostic information without the need for centralized laboratory facilities. This capability is particularly valuable in emergency departments, intensive care units, and resource-limited settings where timely diagnosis and treatment decisions are critical. The integration of AI and machine learning algorithms enhances the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of bloodstream infection testing. AI-driven platforms analyze large volumes of clinical data, including patient symptoms, laboratory results, and epidemiological data, to identify patterns indicative of bloodstream infections. These technologies aid in predicting patient outcomes, optimizing antimicrobial therapy, and detecting emerging infectious disease threats. Furthermore, AI algorithms assist in interpreting complex diagnostic test results, reducing diagnostic errors, and improving overall clinical decision-making in bloodstream infection management.
Bioinformatics tools and data analytics contribute to the growth of the bloodstream infection testing market by enabling comprehensive analysis of microbial genomes, antibiotic resistance profiles, and epidemiological trends. These tools facilitate the identification of novel pathogens, characterization of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, and surveillance of outbreaks in healthcare settings. By leveraging big data analytics, healthcare providers and public health authorities can implement targeted infection control measures and optimize treatment strategies tailored to local epidemiological trends, thereby mitigating the spread of bloodstream infections and improving patient care outcomes. Technological advancements in diagnostic testing, including improved sensitivity, rapid turnaround time, point-of-care capabilities, AI integration, and bioinformatics advancements, drive innovation and growth in the Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market. These advancements enable healthcare providers to diagnose bloodstream infections more accurately and efficiently, improve patient management, optimize antimicrobial stewardship, and enhance overall healthcare delivery across diverse clinical settings globally.
Strategic Initiatives for Infection Control and Prevention
Healthcare organizations globally prioritize infection control and prevention strategies to improve healthcare quality and enhance patient safety. Bloodstream infections are a significant concern in hospital settings due to their association with invasive procedures, indwelling medical devices (e.g., central venous catheters), and antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Strategic initiatives focus on implementing evidence-based infection prevention practices, such as hand hygiene protocols, aseptic techniques during invasive procedures, and antimicrobial stewardship programs. Robust bloodstream infection testing plays a crucial role in these initiatives by enabling early detection and surveillance of infections, guiding timely interventions, and reducing the transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens.
Regulatory agencies and public health authorities worldwide establish guidelines and standards that mandate bloodstream infection testing protocols in healthcare settings. These regulations aim to standardize diagnostic practices, ensure the accuracy and reliability of test results, and mitigate the risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Compliance with regulatory requirements incentivizes healthcare facilities to invest in advanced diagnostic technologies and adopt best practices for bloodstream infection testing. Moreover, regulatory support creates a conducive environment for market growth by fostering innovation, enhancing product development, and promoting the adoption of new diagnostic solutions that align with infection control objectives.
Healthcare systems recognize the economic burden associated with HAIs, including bloodstream infections, which contribute to prolonged hospitalizations, increased healthcare costs, and adverse patient outcomes. Strategic initiatives for infection control and prevention aim to contain healthcare expenditures by reducing the incidence of HAIs through effective diagnostic testing and surveillance. Investing in bloodstream infection testing technologies that offer rapid turnaround times, accurate pathogen detection, and antimicrobial resistance profiling supports cost-effective patient management strategies. These initiatives promote the adoption of innovative diagnostic solutions that optimize antimicrobial therapy, minimize treatment failures, and improve overall healthcare resource utilization. Collaboration among healthcare providers, clinical laboratories, industry stakeholders, and public health agencies enhances infection control and prevention efforts in bloodstream infection testing. Collaborative initiatives facilitate knowledge sharing, data exchange, and implementation of best practices across healthcare settings. By leveraging multidisciplinary expertise and resources, healthcare stakeholders can develop comprehensive infection control strategies tailored to local epidemiological trends and patient populations. Strategic partnerships also drive research and development of novel diagnostic technologies, such as point-of-care testing platforms and molecular assays, designed to enhance the accuracy, accessibility, and affordability of bloodstream infection testing worldwide.
Rapid identification and containment of bloodstream infections are critical components of public health surveillance and outbreak response strategies. Strategic initiatives focus on strengthening surveillance systems to monitor trends in bloodstream infection rates, identify clusters or outbreaks of infections, and implement timely interventions to prevent further transmission. Bloodstream infection testing plays a pivotal role in surveillance efforts by providing real-time data on pathogen epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and treatment outcomes. Enhanced surveillance capabilities enable healthcare authorities to implement targeted infection control measures, allocate resources effectively, and mitigate the impact of bloodstream infections on public health. Strategic initiatives for infection control and prevention drive the growth of the Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market by promoting regulatory compliance, enhancing healthcare quality and patient safety, containing healthcare costs, fostering collaborative partnerships, and strengthening public health surveillance efforts. These initiatives create a supportive environment for innovation, adoption of advanced diagnostic technologies, and implementation of evidence-based practices that contribute to improved clinical outcomes and enhanced healthcare delivery worldwide.

Key Market Challenges
Antibiotic Resistance and Changing Pathogen Profiles
One significant challenge facing the bloodstream infection testing market is the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and changing pathogen profiles. Antibiotic resistance is increasingly prevalent globally, driven by the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in healthcare settings and agriculture. This phenomenon complicates treatment options for bloodstream infections, as resistant pathogens may not respond to standard antibiotic therapies. Moreover, the diversity of pathogens causing bloodstream infections, including new and emerging strains, poses diagnostic challenges. Current diagnostic tests may struggle to identify these evolving pathogens accurately, leading to delayed or ineffective treatment. Addressing this challenge requires ongoing surveillance of antibiotic resistance patterns, development of new diagnostic technologies capable of detecting resistance mechanisms, and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs to optimize antibiotic use.
Complexity and Limitations of Diagnostic Tests
The complexity and limitations of existing diagnostic tests represent another significant challenge in the bloodstream infection testing market. Traditional blood culture methods, while considered the gold standard, have limitations such as lengthy turnaround times (typically 24-48 hours or longer), potential for contamination, and occasional false-negative results, particularly in patients already receiving antibiotics. These limitations delay diagnosis and treatment initiation, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Furthermore, molecular diagnostic technologies, although advancing rapidly, may face challenges such as cost constraints, variability in sensitivity and specificity, and the need for specialized laboratory infrastructure and expertise. Overcoming these challenges requires continued research and development efforts to enhance the speed, accuracy, and accessibility of diagnostic tests for bloodstream infections, thereby improving clinical decision-making and patient care.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Barriers
Regulatory and reimbursement barriers pose significant challenges to market growth in bloodstream infection testing. Different regions and countries have varying regulatory requirements for diagnostic tests, including approval processes, quality standards, and surveillance requirements. Navigating these regulatory landscapes can be time-consuming and costly for manufacturers, delaying market entry and product adoption. Moreover, reimbursement policies may not adequately cover the costs associated with advanced diagnostic technologies or may favor traditional testing methods over newer, more innovative approaches. This disparity can hinder investment in research and development of new diagnostic solutions and limit access to advanced diagnostic tests for patients and healthcare providers. Addressing regulatory and reimbursement barriers requires collaboration between industry stakeholders, regulatory authorities, and healthcare payers to streamline approval processes, establish clear reimbursement guidelines, and ensure equitable access to innovative bloodstream infection testing technologies.
Key Market Trends
Advancements in Molecular Diagnostics
One significant trend shaping the future of bloodstream infection testing is the rapid advancement in molecular diagnostic technologies. These technologies enable quicker and more accurate detection of pathogens directly from blood samples, bypassing the time-consuming culture methods. Techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), nucleic acid amplification, and sequencing technologies are becoming increasingly prominent due to their high sensitivity and specificity. They allow for the identification of a broader range of pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, in a shorter timeframe. This trend is driven by the need for faster turnaround times in diagnosis, especially in critical care settings, and the ability to detect antibiotic resistance genes, guiding more targeted and effective treatment decisions.
Rise in Healthcare-associated Infections (HAIs)
Another significant trend influencing the growth of the bloodstream infection testing market is the increasing prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). HAIs, including bloodstream infections, continue to pose a substantial burden on healthcare systems globally, leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased mortality rates, and higher healthcare costs. The rise in invasive medical procedures, immunocompromised patient populations, and antibiotic-resistant pathogens contributes to the growing incidence of HAIs. As a result, there is a heightened demand for reliable and rapid diagnostic tests to promptly identify bloodstream infections and initiate appropriate treatment strategies. This trend underscores the importance of effective infection control measures and robust diagnostic capabilities in healthcare facilities worldwide.
Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning
The integration of AI and machine learning algorithms into bloodstream infection testing represents a transformative trend in the market. AI-driven diagnostic tools analyze vast amounts of patient data, including clinical symptoms, laboratory results, and imaging findings, to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of infection detection and diagnosis. These technologies can assist healthcare providers in predicting patient outcomes, optimizing antimicrobial therapy, and identifying potential outbreaks of bloodstream infections. AI-powered solutions also support real-time decision-making, reduce diagnostic errors, and improve overall patient care. As healthcare systems increasingly adopt digital health technologies, AI and machine learning are poised to play a pivotal role in advancing the field of bloodstream infection testing, driving market growth through enhanced diagnostic capabilities and clinical outcomes.
Segmental Insights
Product Insights
Based on the category of Product, the reagents and consumables segment emerged as the dominant in the global market for Bloodstream Infection Testing in 2023. Reagents and consumables are critical components required for conducting bloodstream infection testing. These include culture media, biochemical assays, blood culture bottles, testing kits, and other consumables necessary for sample collection, processing, and analysis. Unlike capital equipment or software solutions, reagents and consumables are typically used on a per-test basis. Hospitals, diagnostic labs, and healthcare facilities need to regularly purchase these items to perform tests on patients suspected of bloodstream infections. This results in frequent and ongoing consumption of reagents and consumables. The global market for bloodstream infection testing has been expanding due to increasing incidences of infections, advancements in diagnostic technologies, and the growing awareness of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). As a result, there is a consistent demand for reagents and consumables across various regions. Innovations in molecular diagnostics and automation have led to the development of more efficient and accurate testing methods. These advancements often require specialized reagents and consumables that cater to specific testing protocols, thereby driving the market for these products. These factors are expected to drive the growth of this segment.
Sample Type Insights
The blood culture pharmacies segment is projected to experience rapid growth during the forecast period. Blood cultures remain the gold standard for detecting bloodstream infections (BSIs) because they directly sample blood, where pathogens circulate during an infection. This direct sampling increases the likelihood of detecting even low levels of pathogens, thus providing highly reliable diagnostic results. Blood cultures can detect a wide range of pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and sometimes viruses, depending on the specific techniques and culture conditions used. This comprehensive coverage is crucial as bloodstream infections can be caused by various microorganisms, and identifying the exact pathogen helps in targeted treatment. Bloodstream infections are considered serious medical conditions that can lead to severe complications if not promptly diagnosed and treated. The clinical significance of blood culture results in guiding appropriate antibiotic therapy and management strategies, thereby influencing patient outcomes significantly. Blood cultures are a routine part of diagnostic protocols in hospitals and healthcare facilities worldwide. This established practice ensures that blood culture testing is readily accessible and routinely performed when patients present with symptoms suggestive of bloodstream infections. These factors collectively contribute to the growth of this segment.
Regional Insights
North America emerged as the dominant in the global Bloodstream Infection Testing in 2023, holding the largest market share in terms of value. North America, particularly the United States, possesses a highly developed healthcare infrastructure with sophisticated diagnostic facilities and a strong emphasis on infection control and prevention. This infrastructure supports robust diagnostic testing capabilities, including advanced laboratories equipped for rapid and accurate bloodstream infection testing. Healthcare-associated infections, including bloodstream infections, remain a significant challenge in North America despite rigorous infection control measures. The region's dense population centers and extensive healthcare networks contribute to a higher incidence of bloodstream infections, necessitating frequent and comprehensive testing.
North America, especially the US, has stringent regulatory standards and guidelines that mandate the use of standardized diagnostic protocols, including blood culture testing, for suspected bloodstream infections. These regulations ensure consistency and reliability in testing practices across healthcare facilities, thereby driving market growth. The region is at the forefront of technological advancements in diagnostic testing, including molecular diagnostics and automated blood culture systems. These innovations improve the speed and accuracy of bloodstream infection detection, enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing healthcare costs associated with prolonged hospital stays and ineffective treatments.
Key Market Players
• bioMérieux SA
• Becton, Dickinson and Company
• Cepheid
• Seegene Inc
• T2 Biosystems, Inc
• F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
• Siemens Healthcare Private Limited
• Luminex Corporation
• Bruker Corporation
• Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc
Report Scope:
In this report, the Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:
• Bloodstream Infection Testing Market, By Product:
o Reagents & Consumables
o Instruments
• Bloodstream Infection Testing Market, By Sample Type:
o Whole Blood
o Blood Culture
• Bloodstream Infection Testing Market, By Technology:
o PCR
o Mass Spectroscopy
o In Situ Hybridization
o Others
• Bloodstream Infection Testing Market, By End User:
o Hospitals & Diagnostic Centers
o Custom Laboratory Service Providers
o Academic & Research Institutes
o Others
• Bloodstream Infection Testing Market, By Region:
o North America
§ United States
§ Canada
§ Mexico
o Europe
§ France
§ United Kingdom
§ Italy
§ Germany
§ Spain
o Asia-Pacific
§ China
§ India
§ Japan
§ Australia
§ South Korea
o South America
§ Brazil
§ Argentina
§ Colombia
o Middle East & Africa
§ South Africa
§ Saudi Arabia
§ UAE
Competitive Landscape
Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market.
Available Customizations:
Global Bloodstream Infection Testing market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
Company Information
• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

ページTOPに戻る

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Product (Reagents & Consumables, Instruments)
5.2.2. By Sample Type (Whole Blood, Blood Culture)
5.2.3. By Technology (PCR, Mass Spectroscopy, In Situ Hybridization, Others)
5.2.4. By End User (Hospitals & Diagnostic Centers, Custom Laboratory Service Providers, Academic & Research Institutes, Others)
5.2.5. By Region
5.2.6. By Company (2023)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Product
6.2.2. By Sample Type
6.2.3. By Technology
6.2.4. By End User
6.2.5. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.1.1.1. By Value
6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.1.2.1. By Product
6.3.1.2.2. By Sample Type
6.3.1.2.3. By Technology
6.3.1.2.4. By End User
6.3.2. Canada Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.2.1.1. By Value
6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.2.2.1. By Product
6.3.2.2.2. By Sample Type
6.3.2.2.3. By Technology
6.3.2.2.4. By End User
6.3.3. Mexico Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.3.1.1. By Value
6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.3.2.1. By Product
6.3.3.2.2. By Sample Type
6.3.3.2.3. By Technology
6.3.3.2.4. By End User
7. Europe Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Product
7.2.2. By Sample Type
7.2.3. By Technology
7.2.4. By End User
7.2.5. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.1.1.1. By Value
7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.1.2.1. By Product
7.3.1.2.2. By Sample Type
7.3.1.2.3. By Technology
7.3.1.2.4. By End User
7.3.2. United Kingdom Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.2.1.1. By Value
7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.2.2.1. By Product
7.3.2.2.2. By Sample Type
7.3.2.2.3. By Technology
7.3.2.2.4. By End User
7.3.3. Italy Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.3.1.1. By Value
7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.3.2.1. By Product
7.3.3.2.2. By Sample Type
7.3.3.2.3. By Technology
7.3.3.2.4. By End User
7.3.4. France Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.4.1.1. By Value
7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.4.2.1. By Product
7.3.4.2.2. By Sample Type
7.3.4.2.3. By Technology
7.3.4.2.4. By End User
7.3.5. Spain Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.5.1.1. By Value
7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.5.2.1. By Product
7.3.5.2.2. By Sample Type
7.3.5.2.3. By Technology
7.3.5.2.4. By End User
8. Asia-Pacific Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Product
8.2.2. By Sample Type
8.2.3. By Technology
8.2.4. By End User
8.2.5. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.1.1.1. By Value
8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.1.2.1. By Product
8.3.1.2.2. By Sample Type
8.3.1.2.3. By Technology
8.3.1.2.4. By End User
8.3.2. India Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.2.1.1. By Value
8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.2.2.1. By Product
8.3.2.2.2. By Sample Type
8.3.2.2.3. By Technology
8.3.2.2.4. By End User
8.3.3. Japan Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.3.1.1. By Value
8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.3.2.1. By Product
8.3.3.2.2. By Sample Type
8.3.3.2.3. By Technology
8.3.3.2.4. By End User
8.3.4. South Korea Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.4.1.1. By Value
8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.4.2.1. By Product
8.3.4.2.2. By Sample Type
8.3.4.2.3. By Technology
8.3.4.2.4. By End User
8.3.5. Australia Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.5.1.1. By Value
8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.5.2.1. By Product
8.3.5.2.2. By Sample Type
8.3.5.2.3. By Technology
8.3.5.2.4. By End User
9. South America Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Product
9.2.2. By Sample Type
9.2.3. By Technology
9.2.4. By End User
9.2.5. By Country
9.3. South America: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Brazil Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.1.1.1. By Value
9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.1.2.1. By Product
9.3.1.2.2. By Sample Type
9.3.1.2.3. By Technology
9.3.1.2.4. By End User
9.3.2. Argentina Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.2.1.1. By Value
9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.2.2.1. By Product
9.3.2.2.2. By Sample Type
9.3.2.2.3. By Technology
9.3.2.2.4. By End User
9.3.3. Colombia Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.3.1.1. By Value
9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.3.2.1. By Product
9.3.3.2.2. By Sample Type
9.3.3.2.3. By Technology
9.3.3.2.4. By End User
10. Middle East and Africa Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Product
10.2.2. By Sample Type
10.2.3. By Technology
10.2.4. By End User
10.2.5. By Country
10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
10.3.1. South Africa Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.1.1.1. By Value
10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.1.2.1. By Product
10.3.1.2.2. By Sample Type
10.3.1.2.3. By Technology
10.3.1.2.4. By End User
10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.2.1.1. By Value
10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.2.2.1. By Product
10.3.2.2.2. By Sample Type
10.3.2.2.3. By Technology
10.3.2.2.4. By End User
10.3.3. UAE Bloodstream Infection Testing Market Outlook
10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.3.1.1. By Value
10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.3.2.1. By Product
10.3.3.2.2. By Sample Type
10.3.3.2.3. By Technology
10.3.3.2.4. By End User
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Recent Developments
12.2. Product Launches
12.3. Mergers & Acquisitions
13. Global Bloodstream Infection Testing Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Competitive Landscape
14.1. bioMérieux SA
14.1.1. Business Overview
14.1.2. Product & Service Offerings
14.1.3. Financials (If Listed)
14.1.4. Recent Developments
14.1.5. Key Personnel
14.1.6. SWOT Analysis
14.2. Becton, Dickinson and Company
14.3. Cepheid
14.4. Seegene Inc
14.5. T2 Biosystems, Inc
14.6. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
14.7. Siemens Healthcare Private Limited
14.8. Luminex Corporation
14.9. Bruker Corporation
14.10.Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc
15. Strategic Recommendations
16. About Us & Disclaimer