世界各国のリアルタイムなデータ・インテリジェンスで皆様をお手伝い

シングルユースバイオリアクター市場(第3版):バイオリアクターの種類(攪拌槽、空気混合、ロッカー/回転、波動誘導、パドルスリーブ、固定床、中空糸、拡散、軌道振盪)、操作規模(ラボ、臨床、商業)、細胞培養の種類(哺乳類、昆虫、微生物、ウイルス、植物、細菌)、合成される生物製剤の種類(ワクチン、モノクローナル抗体、組換えタンパク質、幹細胞、細胞治療、遺伝子治療)、応用分野(がん研究、幹細胞研究、組織工学/再生医療、創薬/毒性試験、その他)、エンドユーザー(バイオ医薬品/製薬産業、学術/研究機関)、主要地域(北米、欧州、アジア太平洋、中南米、中東・北アフリカ):業界動向と世界予測、2023-2035年


Single Use Bioreactors Market (3rd Edition) Distribution by Type of Bioreactor (Stirred Tank, Pneumatically Mixed, Rocker / Rotating, Wave-Induced, Paddle Sleeve, Fixed-Bed, Hollow Fibre, Diffusion, and Orbitally Shaken), Scale of Operation (Lab, Clinical and Commercial), Type of Cell Culture (Mammalian, Insect, Microbial, Viral, Plant and Bacterial), Type of Biologics Synthesized (Vaccine, Monoclonal Antibody, Recombinant Protein, Stem Cell, Cell Therapy, and Gene Therapy), Application Area (Cancer Research, Stem Cell Research, Tissue Engineering / Regenerative Medicine, Drug Discovery / Toxicity Testing and Others), End-users (Biopharmaceutical / Pharmaceutical Industries, Academic / Research Institutes), and Key Geographical Regions (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and North Africa): Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2023-2035

単一使用バイオリアクターの世界市場は、2023年から2035年の予測期間中に17%の年平均成長率で成長すると予測され、2035年までに66億米ドルに達すると予想されている。 近年、バイオ医薬品はその優れた治療効... もっと見る

 

 

出版社 出版年月 電子版価格 ページ数 言語
Roots Analysis
ルーツアナリシス
2023年7月28日 US$4,799
シングルユーザライセンス
ライセンス・価格情報
注文方法はこちら
356 英語

 

サマリー

単一使用バイオリアクターの世界市場は、2023年から2035年の予測期間中に17%の年平均成長率で成長すると予測され、2035年までに66億米ドルに達すると予想されている。

近年、バイオ医薬品はその優れた治療効果から絶大な注目を集めている。USFDAは過去20年間に170以上の生物製剤を承認しており、現在10,000以上が様々な開発段階にある。このような複雑な生体分子を製造するには、特殊なバイオプロセス機器が不可欠である。かつてはステンレス製のバイオリアクターが主流であったが、シングルユース・バイオリアクターへと徐々にシフトしている。使い捨てのバイオリアクター・バッグがスチール容器の代わりに使用され、高品質の抗体、細胞治療、遺伝子治療、その他のバイオ治療薬の製造に不可欠である。この移行は、従来のバイオリアクターに比べていくつかの利点をもたらす。シングルユース・バイオリアクターはコスト効率に優れ、約40%の節約になり、生産スケジュールを約35%短縮できる。また、エネルギーと水の消費量を45%~50%削減し、製品の歩留まりを向上させ、コンタミネーションのリスクを下げることができる。その結果、業界全体の関係者が生物製剤製造に使い捨てバイオリアクターを採用している。さらにメーカーは、警告システム、電子プロセスログ、制御センサー、タッチスクリーン、遠隔監視、安全対策強化などの先進機能を製品に組み込んでいる。このような取り組みは、世界市場に向けてより効率的なシングルユース・バイオリアクターを開発することで生物製剤の需要増に対応し、その普及を促すことを目的としている。シングルユース・バイオリアクターの世界市場は、予測期間中に高まる生物製剤の需要を満たすために大きく成長すると予想される。

レポート対象範囲
 本レポートでは、バイオリアクターの種類、運転規模、細胞培養の種類、合成される生物製剤の種類、応用分野、エンドユーザー、主要地域など、さまざまな側面からシングルユースバイオリアクター市場を調査しています。
 関係者が直面する潜在的な利点とハードルを評価しながら、市場の成長促進要因、制限、機会、課題を評価する。さらに、主要市場プレイヤー間の競争状況についての洞察も提供しています。
 シングルユースバイオリアクター市場の現状と予想される将来動向の詳細な分析とともに、主要5地域における市場セグメントの収益予測が重要な要素となっています。これには、技術仕様、従来のステンレス製バイオリアクターとの業界比較、規制基準、課題、利点、市場ランドスケープ、これらのバイオリアクターの開発に携わる企業に関する洞察などが含まれます。
 本レポートでは、シングルユース・バイオリアクターの概要について、技術仕様、現在/将来の業界動向、従来のステンレス製バイオリアクターとの比較分析に重点を置いている。本セクションでは、規制基準、既存の課題、シングルユース・バイオリアクターに関連する様々な利点に焦点を当てています。
 バイオリアクターの種類、運転規模、技術仕様、運転モード、細胞培養の種類、合成される生物製剤、エンドユーザー、市場プレイヤーの概要などのパラメータに焦点を当て、商業化されたシングルユース・バイオリアクターと開発中のシングルユース・バイオリアクターの両方を詳細に分析しています。
 市場動向は、ハイブリッドチャート、積み上げ棒グラフ、ヒートマップ、企業規模、バイオリアクターの種類、操作モード、合成された生物製剤、操作規模、地理的分布などの要因に基づいてシングルユースバイオリアクターに従事する企業を表示した世界地図など、様々なグラフ表現を用いて徹底的に調査されます。
 シングルユースバイオリアクターメーカーの競争力を評価するために、サプライヤーの強さ、製品ポートフォリオの多様性、強さを考慮した4次元バブルチャートを採用。
 シングルユース・バイオリアクターの開発に携わる北米、欧州、アジア太平洋、その他の地域の主要企業のプロフィールを集計。各プロフィールは、概要、財務情報(入手可能な場合)、製品ポートフォリオ、最近の開発状況、将来の展望を網羅しています。
 2007年から2023年1月までに設立されたパートナーシップと共同研究については、タイプ、重点分野、関与する生物製剤、バイオリアクターのタイプ、所在地、容量、積極的なプレイヤーを網羅した分析が示されている。
 シングルユースバイオリアクターの競争力をサプライヤーの強さと製品の競争力に基づいて評価し、比較のためにバイオリアクターのタイプ別に分類しています。
 ポートフォリオの強さ、多様性、経験、特許、パートナーシップを考慮し、様々な市場セグメントにおける主要な業界関係者のブランドの人気と認知度に関する意見を提供し、競争優位性の分野を特定しています。
 シングルユース・バイオリアクターに関する出願/付与特許の詳細な調査を行い、トレンド、主要企業、特許評価、相対的重要性を明らかにしています。
 自動化、制御センサー、アラームシステム、電子ログ、タッチスクリーン、リアルタイムトラッキングなど、シングルユース・バイオリアクターの技術的進歩とバイオプロセス開発への影響について考察しています。
 また、SWOTフレームワークを用いて業界動向、推進要因、課題、影響を掘り下げ、シングルユース・バイオリアクター業界に対する各パラメーターの相対的影響を示している。
 最後に、操作規模、主要機能、互換性、開発に携わる企業の詳細など、バイオプロセスコントローラーとオートメーションシステムの概要が記載されている。


主要市場企業
 Applikon Biotechnology
 Biolinx Labsystems
 セラルティア
 細胞培養会社
 セレクサス
 Cercell
 CESCO バイオエンジニアリング
 Cytiva
 エッペンドルフ
 メルクミリポア
 ポール・コーポレーション
 PBSバイオテック
 パーフューズセル
 プロライフセル
 サルトリウス・ステディム・バイオテック
 ソラリスバイオテック
 Synthecon
 サーモフィッシャーサイエンティフィック

ページTOPに戻る


目次

1. PREFACE
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Key Market Insights
1.3. Scope of the Report
1.4. Research Methodology
1.5. Frequently Asked Questions
1.6. Chapter Outlines
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3. INTRODUCTION
3.1. Chapter Overview
3.2. Overview of Single-use Bioreactors
3.2.1. Historical Evolution
3.2.2. Single-use versus Traditional Bioreactors
3.3. Types of Single-use Bioreactors
3.3.1. Based on Cell Culture
3.3.2. Based on Agitation Mechanism
3.4. Advantages of Single-use Bioreactors
3.5. Key Applications Areas
3.6. Prevalent Regulatory Standards
3.7. Challenges Associated with Single-use Bioreactors
3.8. Concluding Remarks
4. MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1. Chapter Overview
4.2. Single-use Bioreactors: Overall Market Landscape
4.2.1. Analysis by Type of Bioreactor
4.2.2. Analysis by Scale of Operation
4.2.3. Analysis by Working Volume (Liters)
4.2.4. Analysis by Stirrer Speed (RPM)
4.2.5. Analysis by Weight of Bioreactor (Kg)
4.2.6. Analysis by Advanced Display / Control Features
4.2.7. Analysis by Mode of Operation
4.2.8. Analysis by Type of Culture
4.2.9. Analysis by Type of Cell Culture
4.2.10. Analysis by Type of Biologics Synthesized
4.2.11. Analysis by End-users
4.3. Single-use Bioreactor Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
4.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
4.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
4.3.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters (Region)
4.3.4. Analysis by Location of Headquarters (Country)
4.4. Leading Manufacturers: Analysis by Number of Products
5. KEY INSIGHTS
5.1. Chapter Overview
5.2. Analysis by Company Size of Manufacturer and Type of Single-use Bioreactor
5.3. Analysis by Type of Single-use Bioreactor and Mode of Operation
5.4. Analysis by Type of Single-use Bioreactor and Type of Biologics Synthesized
5.5. Analysis by Scale of Operation, Type of Cell Culture and Type of Biologics Synthesized
5.6. Analysis by Company Size and Location of Headquarters
5.7. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
6. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
6.1. Chapter Overview
6.2. Methodology
6.3. Assumptions / Key Parameters
6.4. Single-use Bioreactor Manufacturers: Company Competitiveness Analysis
6.4.1. Small Companies
6.4.2. Mid-sized Companies
6.4.3. Large Companies
7. SINGLE-USE BIOREACTOR MANUFACTURERS IN NORTH AMERICA: COMPANY PROFILES
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2.1. Celartia
7.2.1.1. Company Overview
7.2.1.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.1.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.2. Cell Culture Company
7.2.2.1. Company Overview
7.2.2.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.3. Cytiva
7.2.3.1. Company Overview
7.2.3.2. Financial Information
7.2.3.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.4. Merck Millipore
7.2.4.1. Company Overview
7.2.4.2. Financial Information
7.2.4.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.5. Pall Corporation
7.2.5.1. Company Overview
7.2.5.2. Financial Information
7.2.5.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.6. PBS Biotech
7.2.6.1. Company Overview
7.2.6.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.7. Synthecon
7.2.7.1. Company Overview
7.2.7.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.7.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.8. Thermo Fisher Scientific
7.2.8.1. Company Overview
7.2.8.2. Financial Information
7.2.8.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.8.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8. SINGLE-USE BIORECTOR MANUFACTURERS IN EUROPE, ASIA-PACIFIC AND REST OF THE WORLD: COMPANY PROFILES
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Leading Players based in Europe
8.2.1. Applikon Biotechnology
8.2.1.1. Company Overview
8.2.1.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.1.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.2. Cellexus
8.2.2.1. Company Overview
8.2.2.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.3. CerCell
8.2.3.1. Company Overview
8.2.3.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.4. Eppendorf
8.2.4.1. Company Overview
8.2.4.2. Financial Information
8.2.4.3. Product Portfolio
8.2.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.5. PerfuseCell
8.2.5.1. Company Overview
8.2.5.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.6. ProlifeCell
8.2.6.1. Company Overview
8.2.6.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.7. Sartorius Stedim Biotech
8.2.7.1. Company Overview
8.2.7.2. Financial Information
8.2.7.3. Product Portfolio
8.2.7.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.8. Solaris Biotech
8.2.8.1. Company Overview
8.2.8.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.8.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.3. Leading Players based in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World
8.3.1. Biolinx Labsystems
8.3.1.1. Company Overview
8.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
8.3.1.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.3.2. CESCO Bioengineering
8.3.2.1. Company Overview
8.3.2.2. Product Portfolio
8.3.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
9. PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIONS
9.1. Chapter Overview
9.2. Partnership Models
9.3. Single-use Bioreactors: List of Partnerships and Collaborations
9.3.1. Analysis by Year of Partnership
9.3.2. Analysis by Type of Partnership
9.3.3. Analysis by Year and Type of Partnership
9.3.4. Analysis by Focus Area
9.3.5. Analysis by Year of Partnership and Focus Area
9.3.6. Analysis by Type of Partner
9.3.7. Analysis by Type of Biologics Synthesized
9.3.8. Analysis by Type of Bioreactor Involved
9.3.9. Analysis by Location of Facility (Country) and Expanded Bioreactor Capacity
9.3.10. Most Active Players: Analysis by Number of Partnerships
9.3.11. Analysis by Geography
9.3.11.1. Local and International Agreements
9.3.11.2. Intracontinental and Intercontinental Agreements
10. PRODUCT COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
10.1. Chapter Overview
10.2. Methodology
10.3. Assumptions / Key Parameters
10.4. Single-use Bioreactors: Product Competitiveness Analysis
10.4.1. Stirred Tank Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.1.1 Products Offered by Players based In North America
10.4.1.2 Products Offered by Players based In Europe
10.4.1.3 Products Offered by Players based In Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World
10.4.2 Fixed-Bed Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.3 Wave-Induced / Rocking Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.4. Other Types of Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.4.1 Products Offered by Players based In North America
10.4.4.2 Products Offered by Players based In Europe
10.4.4.3 Products Offered by Players based In Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World
11. BRAND POSITIONING ANALYSIS
11.1. Chapter Overview
11.2. Methodology
11.3. Key Parameters
11.4. Brand Positioning Matrix
11.5. Brand Positioning Matrix: Pall Corporation
11.6. Brand Positioning Matrix: Biolinx Labsystems
11.7. Brand Positioning Matrix: Eppendorf
11.8. Brand Positioning Matrix: Solaris Biotech
11.9. Brand Positioning Matrix: Sartorius Stedim Biotech
11.10. Brand Positioning Matrix: Applikon Biotechnology
11.11. Brand Positioning Matrix: Cercell
12. PATENT ANALYSIS
12.1. Chapter Overview
12.2. Scope and Methodology
12.3. Single-use Bioreactors: Patent Analysis
12.3.1. Analysis by Application Year
12.3.2. Analysis by Publication Year
12.3.3. Analysis by Type of Patents and Publication Year
12.3.4. Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
12.3.5. Analysis by CPC Symbols
12.3.6. Analysis by Type of Applicant
12.3.7. Leading Industry Players: Analysis by Number of Patents
12.3.8. Leading Patent Assignees: Analysis by Number of Patents
12.4. Single-use Bioreactors: Patent Benchmarking Analysis
12.4.1. Analysis by Patent Characteristics
12.5. Single-use Bioreactors: Patent Valuation
12.6. Leading Patents by Number of Citations
13. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS
13.1. Chapter Overview
13.2. Key Assumptions and Methodology
13.3. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market, 2023-2035
13.3.1. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market: Distribution by Scale of Operation, 2023-2035
13.3.2. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market: Distribution by Type of Equipment, 2023-2035
13.3.3. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market: Distribution by Geographical Region, 2023-2035
13.4. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market, 2023-2035
13.4.1. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Type of Bioreactor, 2023-2035
13.4.2. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Scale of Operation, 2023-2035
13.4.3. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Type of Cell Culture, 2023-2035
13.4.4. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Type of Biologics Synthesized, 2023-2035
13.4.5. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Application Area, 2023-2035
13.4.6. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by End-users, 2023-2035
13.4.7. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Geographical Region, 2023-2035
14. CASE STUDY: KEY TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN THE SINGLE-USE BIOREACTORS INDUSTRY
14.1. Chapter Overview
14.2. Innovations in Bioreactor Display / Control Features
14.2.1. Built-in System Control Sensors
14.2.2. Advanced Alarm Systems
14.2.3. Electronic-Log Records and Touch Screens
14.2.4. Real-Time Tracking and Remote Monitoring
14.3. Innovation in Mixing Technologies
14.4. Automation in Single-use bioreactors
14.5. Concluding Remarks
15. SWOT ANALYSIS
15.1. Chapter Overview
15.2. Single-use Bioreactors: SWOT Analysis
15.3. Strengths
15.4. Weaknesses
15.5. Opportunities
15.6. Threats
15.7. Comparison of SWOT Factors
16. CASE STUDY: BIOPROCESS CONTROLLERS AND AUTOMATION SYSTEMS
16.1. Chapter Overview
16.2. Bioprocess Control Software: Overall Market Landscape
16.2.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
16.2.2. Analysis by Key Features
16.2.3. Analysis by Compatibility with System
16.2.4. Analysis by Type of Process Controlled
16.3. Bioprocess Control Software Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
16.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
16.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
16.3.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
16.4. Upstream Controllers: Overall Market Landscape
16.4.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
16.4.2. Analysis by Key Features
16.4.3. Analysis by Compatibility with Bioreactor System
16.4.4. Analysis by Type of Bioprocess
16.4.5. Analysis by Type of Process Controlled
16.5. Upstream Controller Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
16.5.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
16.5.2. Analysis by Company Size
16.5.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
16.6. Downstream Controller Systems: Overall Market Landscape
16.6.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
16.6.2. Analysis by Key Features
16.6.3. Analysis by Type of System
16.6.4. Analysis by Type of Bioprocess
16.6.5. Analysis by Application Area
16.7. Downstream Controller System Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
16.7.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
16.7.2. Analysis by Company Size
16.7.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
17. CONCLUSION
18. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS
18.1. Chapter Overview
18.2. Membio
18.2.1. Company Snapshot
18.2.2. Interview Transcript: Shane Kilpatrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer
18.3. Distek
18.3.1. Company Snapshot
18.3.2. Interview Transcript: Justin Cesmat, Manager, Bioprocessing
18.4. Refine Technology
18.4.1. Company Snapshot
18.4.2. Interview Transcript: Bradley Maykow, Quality and Products Manager
18.5. CerCell
18.5.1. Company Snapshot
18.5.2. Interview Transcript: Per Stobbe, Chief Executive Officer
18.6. CelVivo
18.6.1. Company Snapshot
18.6.2. Interview Transcript: Torsten Due Bryld, Global Director of Sales Support
19. APPENDIX I: TABULATED DATA
20. APPENDIX II: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS
21. APPENDIX III: LIST OF BUSINESSES OFFERING BIOPROCESS RELATED ACCESSORIES, EQUIPMENT, AND AUTOMATION SOLUTIONS

 

ページTOPに戻る


 

Summary

The global single use bioreactors market is expected to reach USD 6.60 billion by 2035 anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 17% during the forecast period 2023-2035.

In recent years, biopharmaceuticals have gained immense attention for their outstanding therapeutic effectiveness. The USFDA has approved over 170 biologics in the past 20 years, and more than 10,000 are currently in various stages of development. To manufacture these complex biomolecules, specialized bioprocessing equipment is crucial. While stainless steel bioreactors were once dominant, there's been a gradual shift toward single-use bioreactors. These use disposable bioreactor bags instead of steel vessels and are essential for producing high-quality antibodies, cell therapies, gene therapies, and other bio-therapeutics. This transition brings several advantages over traditional bioreactors. Single-use bioreactors are cost-efficient, saving about 40%, and can shorten production timelines by roughly 35%. They also reduce energy and water consumption by 45%-50%, improve product yield, and lower contamination risks. Consequently, stakeholders across the industry have embraced disposable bioreactors for biologics manufacturing. Moreover, manufacturers are incorporating advanced features like alert systems, electronic process logs, control sensors, touchscreens, remote monitoring, and enhanced safety measures into their offerings. These efforts aim to meet the rising demand for biologics by creating more efficient single-use bioreactors for global markets, encouraging their widespread adoption. The global market for single-use bioreactors is expected to grow significantly to meet the escalating demand for biologics in the forecast period.

Report Coverage
 The report examines the single-use bioreactors market across various dimensions such as type of bioreactor, scale of operation, type of cell culture, type of biologics synthesized, application area, end-users, and key geographical regions
 It assesses the market's growth drivers, limitations, opportunities, and challenges while evaluating potential advantages and hurdles faced by stakeholders. Additionally, it offers insights into the competitive landscape among major market players.
 Forecasting revenue for market segments across five major regions is a key component, alongside an in-depth analysis of the current state and anticipated future trends within the single-use bioreactors market. This encompasses technological specifications, industry comparisons with conventional stainless steel bioreactors, regulatory standards, challenges, advantages, market landscapes, and insights into companies involved in developing these bioreactors.
 The report provides an overview of single-use bioreactors, emphasizing technology specifications, current/future industry trends, and a comparative analysis with traditional stainless steel bioreactors. This section highlights regulatory standards, existing challenges, and various advantages linked with single-use bioreactors.
 Detailed analysis of both commercialized and in-development single-use bioreactors is presented, focusing on parameters such as bioreactor type, operational scale, technology specifications, operational modes, cell culture types, biologics synthesized, end-users, and an overview of market players.
 Market trends are thoroughly examined using various graphical representations, including hybrid charts, stacked bar charts, heat maps, and world maps displaying companies engaged in single-use bioreactors based on factors such as company size, bioreactor types, operational modes, biologics synthesized, operational scales, and geographical distribution.
 A four-dimensional bubble chart is employed to evaluate the competitiveness of single-use bioreactor manufacturers, considering supplier strength, product portfolio diversity, and strength.
 Tabulated profiles of key companies in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World involved in developing single-use bioreactors are included. Each profile covers an overview, financial information (if available), product portfolio, recent developments, and future outlook.
 Analysis of partnerships and collaborations established from 2007 to January 2023 is presented, encompassing types, focus areas, involved biologics, bioreactor types, locations, capacities, and active players.
 It evaluates the competitiveness of single-use bioreactors based on supplier strength and product competitiveness, categorized by bioreactor types for comparison.
 It offers an opinion on the popularity and perception of key industry stakeholders' brands across various market segments, considering portfolio strength, diversity, experience, patents, partnerships, and identifying areas for competitive advantage.
 A detailed examination of patents filed/granted for single-use bioreactors is included, highlighting trends, leading players, patent valuation, and relative importance.
 Exploration of technological advancements in single-use bioreactors, including automation, control sensors, alarm systems, electronic-logs, touch screens, real-time tracking, and their impact on bioprocess development, is discussed.
 The report also delves into industry trends, drivers, challenges, and impacts using a SWOT framework, indicating the relative effect of each parameter on the single-use bioreactors industry.
 Lastly, an overview of bioprocess controllers and automation systems, including operational scale, key features, compatibility, and details of companies involved in their development, is provided.


Key Market Companies
 Applikon Biotechnology
 Biolinx Labsystems
 Celartia
 Cell Culture Company
 Cellexus
 Cercell
 CESCO Bioengineering
 Cytiva
 Eppendorf
 Merck Millipore
 Pall Corporation
 PBS Biotech
 PerfuseCell
 ProlifeCell
 Sartorius Stedim Biotech
 Solaris Biotech
 Synthecon
 Thermo Fisher Scientific



ページTOPに戻る


Table of Contents

1. PREFACE
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Key Market Insights
1.3. Scope of the Report
1.4. Research Methodology
1.5. Frequently Asked Questions
1.6. Chapter Outlines
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3. INTRODUCTION
3.1. Chapter Overview
3.2. Overview of Single-use Bioreactors
3.2.1. Historical Evolution
3.2.2. Single-use versus Traditional Bioreactors
3.3. Types of Single-use Bioreactors
3.3.1. Based on Cell Culture
3.3.2. Based on Agitation Mechanism
3.4. Advantages of Single-use Bioreactors
3.5. Key Applications Areas
3.6. Prevalent Regulatory Standards
3.7. Challenges Associated with Single-use Bioreactors
3.8. Concluding Remarks
4. MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1. Chapter Overview
4.2. Single-use Bioreactors: Overall Market Landscape
4.2.1. Analysis by Type of Bioreactor
4.2.2. Analysis by Scale of Operation
4.2.3. Analysis by Working Volume (Liters)
4.2.4. Analysis by Stirrer Speed (RPM)
4.2.5. Analysis by Weight of Bioreactor (Kg)
4.2.6. Analysis by Advanced Display / Control Features
4.2.7. Analysis by Mode of Operation
4.2.8. Analysis by Type of Culture
4.2.9. Analysis by Type of Cell Culture
4.2.10. Analysis by Type of Biologics Synthesized
4.2.11. Analysis by End-users
4.3. Single-use Bioreactor Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
4.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
4.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
4.3.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters (Region)
4.3.4. Analysis by Location of Headquarters (Country)
4.4. Leading Manufacturers: Analysis by Number of Products
5. KEY INSIGHTS
5.1. Chapter Overview
5.2. Analysis by Company Size of Manufacturer and Type of Single-use Bioreactor
5.3. Analysis by Type of Single-use Bioreactor and Mode of Operation
5.4. Analysis by Type of Single-use Bioreactor and Type of Biologics Synthesized
5.5. Analysis by Scale of Operation, Type of Cell Culture and Type of Biologics Synthesized
5.6. Analysis by Company Size and Location of Headquarters
5.7. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
6. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
6.1. Chapter Overview
6.2. Methodology
6.3. Assumptions / Key Parameters
6.4. Single-use Bioreactor Manufacturers: Company Competitiveness Analysis
6.4.1. Small Companies
6.4.2. Mid-sized Companies
6.4.3. Large Companies
7. SINGLE-USE BIOREACTOR MANUFACTURERS IN NORTH AMERICA: COMPANY PROFILES
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2.1. Celartia
7.2.1.1. Company Overview
7.2.1.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.1.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.2. Cell Culture Company
7.2.2.1. Company Overview
7.2.2.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.3. Cytiva
7.2.3.1. Company Overview
7.2.3.2. Financial Information
7.2.3.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.4. Merck Millipore
7.2.4.1. Company Overview
7.2.4.2. Financial Information
7.2.4.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.5. Pall Corporation
7.2.5.1. Company Overview
7.2.5.2. Financial Information
7.2.5.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.6. PBS Biotech
7.2.6.1. Company Overview
7.2.6.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.7. Synthecon
7.2.7.1. Company Overview
7.2.7.2. Product Portfolio
7.2.7.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.2.8. Thermo Fisher Scientific
7.2.8.1. Company Overview
7.2.8.2. Financial Information
7.2.8.3. Product Portfolio
7.2.8.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8. SINGLE-USE BIORECTOR MANUFACTURERS IN EUROPE, ASIA-PACIFIC AND REST OF THE WORLD: COMPANY PROFILES
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Leading Players based in Europe
8.2.1. Applikon Biotechnology
8.2.1.1. Company Overview
8.2.1.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.1.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.2. Cellexus
8.2.2.1. Company Overview
8.2.2.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.3. CerCell
8.2.3.1. Company Overview
8.2.3.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.4. Eppendorf
8.2.4.1. Company Overview
8.2.4.2. Financial Information
8.2.4.3. Product Portfolio
8.2.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.5. PerfuseCell
8.2.5.1. Company Overview
8.2.5.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.6. ProlifeCell
8.2.6.1. Company Overview
8.2.6.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.7. Sartorius Stedim Biotech
8.2.7.1. Company Overview
8.2.7.2. Financial Information
8.2.7.3. Product Portfolio
8.2.7.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.2.8. Solaris Biotech
8.2.8.1. Company Overview
8.2.8.2. Product Portfolio
8.2.8.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.3. Leading Players based in Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World
8.3.1. Biolinx Labsystems
8.3.1.1. Company Overview
8.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
8.3.1.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8.3.2. CESCO Bioengineering
8.3.2.1. Company Overview
8.3.2.2. Product Portfolio
8.3.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
9. PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIONS
9.1. Chapter Overview
9.2. Partnership Models
9.3. Single-use Bioreactors: List of Partnerships and Collaborations
9.3.1. Analysis by Year of Partnership
9.3.2. Analysis by Type of Partnership
9.3.3. Analysis by Year and Type of Partnership
9.3.4. Analysis by Focus Area
9.3.5. Analysis by Year of Partnership and Focus Area
9.3.6. Analysis by Type of Partner
9.3.7. Analysis by Type of Biologics Synthesized
9.3.8. Analysis by Type of Bioreactor Involved
9.3.9. Analysis by Location of Facility (Country) and Expanded Bioreactor Capacity
9.3.10. Most Active Players: Analysis by Number of Partnerships
9.3.11. Analysis by Geography
9.3.11.1. Local and International Agreements
9.3.11.2. Intracontinental and Intercontinental Agreements
10. PRODUCT COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
10.1. Chapter Overview
10.2. Methodology
10.3. Assumptions / Key Parameters
10.4. Single-use Bioreactors: Product Competitiveness Analysis
10.4.1. Stirred Tank Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.1.1 Products Offered by Players based In North America
10.4.1.2 Products Offered by Players based In Europe
10.4.1.3 Products Offered by Players based In Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World
10.4.2 Fixed-Bed Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.3 Wave-Induced / Rocking Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.4. Other Types of Single-use Bioreactors
10.4.4.1 Products Offered by Players based In North America
10.4.4.2 Products Offered by Players based In Europe
10.4.4.3 Products Offered by Players based In Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World
11. BRAND POSITIONING ANALYSIS
11.1. Chapter Overview
11.2. Methodology
11.3. Key Parameters
11.4. Brand Positioning Matrix
11.5. Brand Positioning Matrix: Pall Corporation
11.6. Brand Positioning Matrix: Biolinx Labsystems
11.7. Brand Positioning Matrix: Eppendorf
11.8. Brand Positioning Matrix: Solaris Biotech
11.9. Brand Positioning Matrix: Sartorius Stedim Biotech
11.10. Brand Positioning Matrix: Applikon Biotechnology
11.11. Brand Positioning Matrix: Cercell
12. PATENT ANALYSIS
12.1. Chapter Overview
12.2. Scope and Methodology
12.3. Single-use Bioreactors: Patent Analysis
12.3.1. Analysis by Application Year
12.3.2. Analysis by Publication Year
12.3.3. Analysis by Type of Patents and Publication Year
12.3.4. Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
12.3.5. Analysis by CPC Symbols
12.3.6. Analysis by Type of Applicant
12.3.7. Leading Industry Players: Analysis by Number of Patents
12.3.8. Leading Patent Assignees: Analysis by Number of Patents
12.4. Single-use Bioreactors: Patent Benchmarking Analysis
12.4.1. Analysis by Patent Characteristics
12.5. Single-use Bioreactors: Patent Valuation
12.6. Leading Patents by Number of Citations
13. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS
13.1. Chapter Overview
13.2. Key Assumptions and Methodology
13.3. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market, 2023-2035
13.3.1. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market: Distribution by Scale of Operation, 2023-2035
13.3.2. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market: Distribution by Type of Equipment, 2023-2035
13.3.3. Global Single-use Upstream Bioprocessing Technology Market: Distribution by Geographical Region, 2023-2035
13.4. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market, 2023-2035
13.4.1. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Type of Bioreactor, 2023-2035
13.4.2. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Scale of Operation, 2023-2035
13.4.3. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Type of Cell Culture, 2023-2035
13.4.4. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Type of Biologics Synthesized, 2023-2035
13.4.5. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Application Area, 2023-2035
13.4.6. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by End-users, 2023-2035
13.4.7. Global Single-use Bioreactors Market: Distribution by Geographical Region, 2023-2035
14. CASE STUDY: KEY TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN THE SINGLE-USE BIOREACTORS INDUSTRY
14.1. Chapter Overview
14.2. Innovations in Bioreactor Display / Control Features
14.2.1. Built-in System Control Sensors
14.2.2. Advanced Alarm Systems
14.2.3. Electronic-Log Records and Touch Screens
14.2.4. Real-Time Tracking and Remote Monitoring
14.3. Innovation in Mixing Technologies
14.4. Automation in Single-use bioreactors
14.5. Concluding Remarks
15. SWOT ANALYSIS
15.1. Chapter Overview
15.2. Single-use Bioreactors: SWOT Analysis
15.3. Strengths
15.4. Weaknesses
15.5. Opportunities
15.6. Threats
15.7. Comparison of SWOT Factors
16. CASE STUDY: BIOPROCESS CONTROLLERS AND AUTOMATION SYSTEMS
16.1. Chapter Overview
16.2. Bioprocess Control Software: Overall Market Landscape
16.2.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
16.2.2. Analysis by Key Features
16.2.3. Analysis by Compatibility with System
16.2.4. Analysis by Type of Process Controlled
16.3. Bioprocess Control Software Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
16.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
16.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
16.3.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
16.4. Upstream Controllers: Overall Market Landscape
16.4.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
16.4.2. Analysis by Key Features
16.4.3. Analysis by Compatibility with Bioreactor System
16.4.4. Analysis by Type of Bioprocess
16.4.5. Analysis by Type of Process Controlled
16.5. Upstream Controller Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
16.5.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
16.5.2. Analysis by Company Size
16.5.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
16.6. Downstream Controller Systems: Overall Market Landscape
16.6.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
16.6.2. Analysis by Key Features
16.6.3. Analysis by Type of System
16.6.4. Analysis by Type of Bioprocess
16.6.5. Analysis by Application Area
16.7. Downstream Controller System Manufacturers: Overall Market Landscape
16.7.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
16.7.2. Analysis by Company Size
16.7.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
17. CONCLUSION
18. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS
18.1. Chapter Overview
18.2. Membio
18.2.1. Company Snapshot
18.2.2. Interview Transcript: Shane Kilpatrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer
18.3. Distek
18.3.1. Company Snapshot
18.3.2. Interview Transcript: Justin Cesmat, Manager, Bioprocessing
18.4. Refine Technology
18.4.1. Company Snapshot
18.4.2. Interview Transcript: Bradley Maykow, Quality and Products Manager
18.5. CerCell
18.5.1. Company Snapshot
18.5.2. Interview Transcript: Per Stobbe, Chief Executive Officer
18.6. CelVivo
18.6.1. Company Snapshot
18.6.2. Interview Transcript: Torsten Due Bryld, Global Director of Sales Support
19. APPENDIX I: TABULATED DATA
20. APPENDIX II: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS
21. APPENDIX III: LIST OF BUSINESSES OFFERING BIOPROCESS RELATED ACCESSORIES, EQUIPMENT, AND AUTOMATION SOLUTIONS

 

ページTOPに戻る

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

webからのご注文・お問合せはこちらのフォームから承ります

本レポートと同分野の最新刊レポート

  • 本レポートと同分野の最新刊レポートはありません。

Roots Analysis社の分野での最新刊レポート

  • 最新刊レポートはありません。

本レポートと同じKEY WORD()の最新刊レポート

  • 本レポートと同じKEY WORDの最新刊レポートはありません。

よくあるご質問


Roots Analysis社はどのような調査会社ですか?


Roots Analysisは2013年設立の医薬品・医療機器が専門の調査会社です。 医薬品の製造委託や創薬のデジタル化など、最新の医薬業界の分析を行っています。 もっと見る


調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?


在庫のあるものは速納となりますが、平均的には 3-4日と見て下さい。
但し、一部の調査レポートでは、発注を受けた段階で内容更新をして納品をする場合もあります。
発注をする前のお問合せをお願いします。


注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?


1)お客様からの御問い合わせをいただきます。
2)見積書やサンプルの提示をいたします。
3)お客様指定、もしくは弊社の発注書をメール添付にて発送してください。
4)データリソース社からレポート発行元の調査会社へ納品手配します。
5) 調査会社からお客様へ納品されます。最近は、pdfにてのメール納品が大半です。


お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?


納品と同時にデータリソース社よりお客様へ請求書(必要に応じて納品書も)を発送いたします。
お客様よりデータリソース社へ(通常は円払い)の御振り込みをお願いします。
請求書は、納品日の日付で発行しますので、翌月最終営業日までの当社指定口座への振込みをお願いします。振込み手数料は御社負担にてお願いします。
お客様の御支払い条件が60日以上の場合は御相談ください。
尚、初めてのお取引先や個人の場合、前払いをお願いすることもあります。ご了承のほど、お願いします。


データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?


当社は、世界各国の主要調査会社・レポート出版社と提携し、世界各国の市場調査レポートや技術動向レポートなどを日本国内の企業・公官庁及び教育研究機関に提供しております。
世界各国の「市場・技術・法規制などの」実情を調査・収集される時には、データリソース社にご相談ください。
お客様の御要望にあったデータや情報を抽出する為のレポート紹介や調査のアドバイスも致します。



詳細検索

このレポートへのお問合せ

03-3582-2531

電話お問合せもお気軽に

 

2024/11/22 10:26

155.52 円

163.34 円

198.56 円

ページTOPに戻る